The Tourism Bureau yesterday announced that the suspension of outbound and inbound tours, imposed on March 19, would be extended until the end of next month, which should have come as no surprise.
However, the announcement came less than two days after Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said that Tokyo was set to hold talks with Taiwan and 11 other nations on easing travel restrictions to allow the entry of businesspeople, which forced Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中) on Thursday to try to dampen enthusiasm about the idea of Taiwanese travelers being able to visit Japan anytime soon.
While the bureau’s decision to extend the ban, which was due to expire at the end of this month, until Aug. 31 is understandable, it was still a disservice to the public and the travel industry.
It is high time that the government, the travel industry and the public admit that the carefree days of traveling abroad for holidays, either on guided tours or as individuals, were a luxury that the nation cannot afford — at least not for the foreseeable future.
That is the crux of the problem created by the rapid spread of SARS-CoV-2, amounting to a pandemic that the world has yet to come to grips with: the idea that there is a foreseeable future.
No one, at this point, can say when the world would “return to normal” or “a new normal,” whatever that might be, for travel or anything else.
Taiwan is a small, densely populated nation, and it is understandable that those who can afford to travel overseas have embraced the opportunities that arose over the past two decades: the advent of budget airlines, longer paid leaves and cheaper group tours.
The idea of jetting off to New Zealand, for example, for a five-day, four-night tour would have seemed impossible before the turn of the century, given the travel time, and the cost of fares and accommodations, but it has since become a popular package offered by local travel agencies, along with week-long trips to European destinations or weekend trips to Japan and South Korea.
The past few years have seen dramatic growth in the outbound tourism sector, which has been as badly hurt by COVID-19 travel restrictions as the inbound sector.
However, Taiwan has been exceedingly fortunate as the COVID-19 crisis grew from an outbreak in China into a pandemic, thanks to the aggressive actions taken by the government and the Central Epidemic Command Center, so that despite some small hiccups, the number of cases stands, as of yesterday, at 458, including 367 imported cases, seven deaths and no locally transmitted case since April 12.
It is no wonder that Japan or other nations would welcome the return of business travelers and tourists from Taiwan, especially nations whose economies are heavily reliant on tourism.
However, those hard-won numbers should not be taken for granted. While Taiwanese and the nation’s foreign residents have shown more common sense than those in too many other nations in adapting to wearing masks and following social distancing guidelines, it is obvious from reports from popular holiday spots in southern Europe and the US over the past few weeks that people on vacation are often too relaxed to take precautions.
The problem is that while travelers on airplanes can wear masks, gloves and even hazmat suits, and carry large containers of hand sanitizer and wet-wipes, they cannot go about encased in a bubble.
Taiwan’s healthcare system should not be asked to deal with new waves of imported cases, just to pacify individuals or companies clamoring for a return to normal.
It is time to admit that travel restrictions are likely to be needed until the end of the year, if not longer. The sooner this “new reality” is acknowledged and planned for, the better for everyone.
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Taiwan’s business-friendly environment and science parks designed to foster technology industries are the key elements of the nation’s winning chip formula, inspiring the US and other countries to try to replicate it. Representatives from US business groups — such as the Greater Phoenix Economic Council, and the Arizona-Taiwan Trade and Investment Office — in July visited the Hsinchu Science Park (新竹科學園區), home to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) headquarters and its first fab. They showed great interest in creating similar science parks, with aims to build an extensive semiconductor chain suitable for the US, with chip designing, packaging and manufacturing. The
RSS