Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) on Tuesday last week announced that air-conditioners would be installed in all classrooms of public elementary and junior-high schools nationwide within two years, and that 70 to 90 percent of the NT$30 billion (US$1.01 billion) expense would be covered by the government.
However, some Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators have demanded that, since schools in remote areas might be unable to afford maintenance fees and electricity bills, the government “guarantee” to cover all those expenses for the schools.
The KMT was unable to implement policies to provide all schools with air-conditioners during its rule, so now that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government is doing it, it is trying to obstruct the project and turn it into a money pit.
Cabinet spokesman Ting Yi-ming (丁怡銘) later said that the government annually spends NT$1.7 billion on subsidies for electricity bills of all public elementary and junior-high schools, and that it of course would subsidize the annual increase of NT$1.53 billion as well.
This is a public issue open to debate.
The government’s decision to install air-conditioners is definitely good, as it shows an understanding of the difficulties students have studying in hot classrooms.
However, the electricity bills for the air-conditioning should not be subsidized by the government.
If the users have to pay for the use of the air-conditioners themselves, it would likely also have an educational effect.
For most air-conditioners in high-school and university classrooms, students help pay for the electricity by using payment cards to switch on the systems.
If, for example, a class of 30 students runs the air-conditioner efficiently by turning it off when leaving for physical education, each of them would pay less than NT$4 for air-conditioning per day.
The government subsidy would be superfluous, as the government’s various tuition exemption and subsidy programs have relieved many parents’ financial burden, to a degree that there are few students who could not afford to contribute to air-conditioning in classrooms.
If the government covers higher electricity bills due to air-conditioning, it would be a misuse of public funds.
It is the parents who should not forget to be responsible for raising their children, and they must also contribute financially.
The ones calling for a “free-of-charge” policy often do so out of greed.
In the past, stores were allowed to hand out plastic bags for free, contributing to a serious environmental problem. Now, stores are required to charge NT$1 to NT$2 per plastic bag, and consumers unwilling to spend even a single dollar have to bring their own shopping bags.
Similarly, when landlords rent out apartments, some include the cost of utilities, such as water and gas in the rent, but no landlord includes electricity bills for air-conditioning.
If landlords did so, some tenants would keep air-conditioners running all day, also while not at home, just to return to a pleasantly cool apartment at night. Why would they not?
If the government subsidized air-conditioning bills for classrooms, would students cherish it?
Would they learn to conserve energy and use the air-conditioning in a resource-efficient way if the government pays for them?
Lin Po-kuan is a junior-high school teacher.
Translated by Eddy Chang
With each passing day, the threat of a People’s Republic of China (PRC) assault on Taiwan grows. Whatever one’s view about the history, there is essentially no question that a PRC conquest of Taiwan would mark the end of the autonomy and freedom enjoyed by the island’s 23 million people. Simply put, the PRC threat to Taiwan is genuinely existential for a free, democratic and autonomous Taiwan. Yet one might not know it from looking at Taiwan. For an island facing a threat so acute, lethal and imminent, Taiwan is showing an alarming lack of urgency in dramatically strengthening its defenses.
As India’s six-week-long general election grinds past the halfway mark, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s messaging has shifted from confident to shrill. After the first couple of phases of polling showed a 3 percentage point drop in turnout, Modi and his party leaders have largely stopped promoting their accomplishments of the past 10 years — or, for that matter, the “Modi guarantees” offered in the Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) manifesto for the next five. Instead, making the majority Hindu population fear and loathe Muslims seems to be the BJP’s preferred talking point. Modi went on the offensive in an April 21
The people of Taiwan recently received confirmation of the strength of American support for their security. Of four foreign aid bills that Congress passed and President Biden signed in April, the bill legislating additional support for Taiwan garnered the most votes. Three hundred eighty-five members of the House of Representatives voted to provide foreign military financing to Taiwan versus only 34 against. More members of Congress voted to support Taiwan than Ukraine, Israel, or banning TikTok. There was scant debate over whether the United States should provide greater support for Taiwan. It was understood and broadly accepted that doing so
I still remember the first time I heard about the possibility of an invasion by China. I was six years old. I thought war was coming and hid in my bed, scared. After 18 years, the invasion news tastes like a sandwich I eat every morning. As a Gen Z Taiwanese student who has witnessed China’s harassment for more than 20 years, I want to share my opinion on China. Every generation goes through different events. I have seen not only the norms of China’s constant presence, but also the Sunflower movement, wars and people fighting over peace or equality,