All statues in Labour Party councils across England and Wales, and across London, are to be examined for links to slavery and plantation owners, their leaders said, as an east London authority took one down off its plinth on Tuesday evening.
The statue of slave owner Robert Milligan at West India Quay in London’s Docklands was removed after the charity which owns the land where it stood promised to organize its “safe removal” following a petition launched by Ehtasham Haque.
The local council, Tower Hamlets, said it had removed the statue and had “also announced a review into monuments and other sites in our borough to understand how we should represent the more troubling periods in our history.”
Earlier, London Mayor Sadiq Khan said the capital’s landmarks — including street names, and the names of public buildings and plaques — would be reviewed by a commission to ensure they reflect the capital’s diversity, with a view to removing those with links to slavery after Black Lives Matter protesters tore down a statue of slave trader Edward Colston in Bristol.
In Manchester, the council announced a citywide review of all the statues in the city “to understand their history and context.”
Manchester Councilor Luthfur Rahman said members of the public would also be asked for suggestions on “missing” statues.
“We also want to take this opportunity to ask the public who is missing — who should be celebrated ,but is not — with particular thought around representing the proud BAME [black and minority ethnic] history of Manchester and help to reflect the shared story of our diverse and multicultural city,” he said.
PRO-SLAVERY
The Manchester City Council is under pressure to remove a statue of Sir Robert Peel in Piccadilly Gardens. More than 1,000 people have signed a petition demanding the removal of the memorial to the two-time British prime minister, born in Bury in Greater Manchester, on the grounds that his father was known to be pro-slavery.
Labour councils across England and Wales are to begin reviews in their towns and cities, too, the Local Government Association’s Labour group said. It will ask council leaders to work with their communities to review “the appropriateness” of monuments and statues in their areas.
Speaking to broadcasters on Tuesday, Khan said he did not condone breaking the law and wanted there to be a proper process for the removal of any statues that do not reflect London’s values.
He would not name which ones should come down, saying it would be a matter for the new commission, but said there were clearly statues commemorating slavers in the capital.
Khan’s new Commission for Diversity in the Public Realm will also consider which legacies should be celebrated before making recommendations about new statues and which could be removed.
“It is an uncomfortable truth that our nation and city owes a large part of its wealth to its role in the slave trade and while this is reflected in our public realm, the contribution of many of our communities to life in our capital has been wilfully ignored. This cannot continue,” Khan said.
“The Black Lives Matter protests have rightly brought this to the public’s attention, but it’s important that we take the right steps to work together to bring change and ensure that we can all be proud of our public landscape,” he said.
The commission — which will be cochaired by Debbie Weekes-Bernard, the deputy mayor for social integration, social mobility and community engagement, and Justine Simons, the deputy mayor for culture and creative industries —– will include historians, as well as arts, council and community leaders.
Pressed on Sky News about where to draw the line, given Winston Churchill held some racist views, Khan said the cases of Churchill, Gandhi and Malcolm X showed that many great historical figures were not perfect and history should be taught “warts and all.”
However, there were clear-cut figures, such as those actively involved in the slave trade and ownership who should not be celebrated, the mayor said.
Khan announced the commission as he attempted to defuse tensions in London ahead of more planned demonstrations against racism.
POLICE FORCE
The London mayor is also pressing the Metropolitan police over the use of stop and search, stun guns and other practices amid concerns about the spread of COVID-19 in crowds, and fears of violence as it emerged that far-right groups were planning counterdemonstrations.
The global Black Lives Matter protests were sparked by the death in the US of George Floyd at the hands of a police officer who held him with a knee on his neck for nearly nine minutes while he protested: “I can’t breathe.”
The UK government has come under fire for its claim that the spreading protests are related to the US rather than prejudice in the UK and denials that Britain is a racist country.
British Prime Minister Boris Johnson on Monday said that Floyd’s death had awakened an “incontrovertible, undeniable feeling of injustice” worldwide.
He had previously condemned the “thuggery” by a minority that marred some demonstrations, but acknowledged many of the activists’ concerns were “founded on a cold reality.”
He said leaders “simply can’t ignore” concerns that black, Asian and minority ethnic groups face discrimination in education, employment and the criminal justice system.
However, the prime minister said those who harmed police or property would face “the full force of the law.”
Labour leader Keir Starmer has said it was “completely wrong” for protesters to pull down the statue of Colston and dump it in the harbor in Bristol — putting him at odds with some lawmakers on the left of his party — while emphasizing the monument should never have been there in the first place.
With each passing day, the threat of a People’s Republic of China (PRC) assault on Taiwan grows. Whatever one’s view about the history, there is essentially no question that a PRC conquest of Taiwan would mark the end of the autonomy and freedom enjoyed by the island’s 23 million people. Simply put, the PRC threat to Taiwan is genuinely existential for a free, democratic and autonomous Taiwan. Yet one might not know it from looking at Taiwan. For an island facing a threat so acute, lethal and imminent, Taiwan is showing an alarming lack of urgency in dramatically strengthening its defenses.
As India’s six-week-long general election grinds past the halfway mark, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s messaging has shifted from confident to shrill. After the first couple of phases of polling showed a 3 percentage point drop in turnout, Modi and his party leaders have largely stopped promoting their accomplishments of the past 10 years — or, for that matter, the “Modi guarantees” offered in the Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) manifesto for the next five. Instead, making the majority Hindu population fear and loathe Muslims seems to be the BJP’s preferred talking point. Modi went on the offensive in an April 21
The people of Taiwan recently received confirmation of the strength of American support for their security. Of four foreign aid bills that Congress passed and President Biden signed in April, the bill legislating additional support for Taiwan garnered the most votes. Three hundred eighty-five members of the House of Representatives voted to provide foreign military financing to Taiwan versus only 34 against. More members of Congress voted to support Taiwan than Ukraine, Israel, or banning TikTok. There was scant debate over whether the United States should provide greater support for Taiwan. It was understood and broadly accepted that doing so
I still remember the first time I heard about the possibility of an invasion by China. I was six years old. I thought war was coming and hid in my bed, scared. After 18 years, the invasion news tastes like a sandwich I eat every morning. As a Gen Z Taiwanese student who has witnessed China’s harassment for more than 20 years, I want to share my opinion on China. Every generation goes through different events. I have seen not only the norms of China’s constant presence, but also the Sunflower movement, wars and people fighting over peace or equality,