Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Tsai Yi-yu (蔡易餘) and fellow DPP lawmakers have proposed amending the Additional Articles to the Constitution and the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例).
The text they want to change deals with the goal of cross-strait unification and the de jure sovereignty of the Republic of China extending to all of China.
In response, China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) spokesman Ma Xiaoguang (馬曉光) said: “It is extremely dangerous that a handful of separatists have misread the situation and become unbridled in pushing Taiwanese independence.”
Although the view that Taiwan is pushing for independence under cover of the COVID-19 pandemic has stirred up a wave of calls in China for unification by military force, what Taiwanese should focus on is probably the use of military force to prevent independence.
Perhaps the reason that legislators from all groups within the DPP and the leaders of the party’s legislative caucus gave their support to these supporters of President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) just before her inauguration today was that they wanted to take the edge off the political pressure created by referendums proposed by those who urgently want independence.
Two referendum questions were proposed: “Do you agree that the president should be asked to initiate constitutional reform?” and “Do you agree that the president should be asked to initiate the creation of a new constitution that suits Taiwan’s current status?”
These questions do not meet the requirements of the Referendum Act (公民投票法), which stipulates that it applies to “referendums on laws” and “initiatives or referendums on important policies.” In addition, the president does not have the constitutional power that these two questions call for.
By bringing the question of writing a new constitution down to a matter of amending the Constitution and a law, Tsai Yi-yu and others have likely helped the president shed some of the pressure from radical independence advocates.
However, from the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) perspective, keeping the national title unchanged is intended to cover up the move toward independence, as the proposed changes recognize that the People’s Republic of China holds de jure sovereignty over “the mainland area.” To the CCP, this is tantamount to the creation of two Chinas and a step on the way toward Taiwanese independence.
The CCP thinks “China” is not divided, that its sovereignty and territory are complete, and that it is just a matter of Taiwan and the rest of China being under “separate rule.”
As the wave of calls for unification by military force sweeps over China, the CCP has stuck to the bottom line of its “Anti-Secession” Law — the use of military force to prevent Taiwanese independence.
On May 4, retired Chinese People’s Liberation Army Air Force major general Qiao Liang (喬良) said on Chinese social media app WeChat: “The Taiwan problem cannot be solved with rashness and radicalism,” and until China’s national strength can match that of the US, it should not fall in the “unification by military force” trap set by the US to block the continued revival of the Chinese nation.
However, Qiao also said that China can use military force to block Taiwan’s independence without starting a war.
Taiwan must understand that while China might not be willing or able to follow through on unification by military force, the possibility that it will use military force to prevent independence is increasing.
Kuei Hung-chen is CEO of the Democracy Foundation.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Reports about Elon Musk planning his own semiconductor fab have sparked anxiety, with some warning that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) could lose key customers to vertical integration. A closer reading suggests a more measured conclusion: Musk is advancing a strategic vision of in-house chip manufacturing, but remains far from replacing the existing foundry ecosystem. For TSMC, the short-term impact is limited; the medium-term challenge lies in supply diversification and pricing pressure, only in the long term could it evolve into a structural threat. The clearest signal is Musk’s announcement that Tesla and SpaceX plan to develop a fab project dubbed “Terafab”
In late January, Taiwan’s first indigenous submarine, the Hai Kun (海鯤, or Narwhal), completed its first submerged dive, reaching a depth of roughly 50m during trials in the waters off Kaohsiung. By March, it had managed a fifth dive, still well short of the deep-water and endurance tests required before the navy could accept the vessel. The original delivery deadline of November last year passed months ago. CSBC Corp, Taiwan, the lead contractor, now targets June and the Ministry of National Defense is levying daily penalties for every day the submarine remains unfinished. The Hai Kun was supposed to be
Most schoolchildren learn that the circumference of the Earth is about 40,000km. They do not learn that the global economy depends on just 160 of those kilometers. Blocking two narrow waterways — the Strait of Hormuz and the Taiwan Strait — could send the economy back in time, if not to the Stone Age that US President Donald Trump has been threatening to bomb Iran back to, then at least to the mid-20th century, before the Rolling Stones first hit the airwaves. Over the past month and a half, Iran has turned the Strait of Hormuz, which is about 39km wide at
The ongoing Middle East crisis has reinforced an uncomfortable truth for Taiwan: In an increasingly interconnected and volatile world, distant wars rarely remain distant. What began as a regional confrontation between the US, Israel and Iran has evolved into a strategic shock wave reverberating far beyond the Persian Gulf. For Taiwan, the consequences are immediate, material and deeply unsettling. From Taipei’s perspective, the conflict has exposed two vulnerabilities — Taiwan’s dependence on imported energy and the risks created when Washington’s military attention is diverted. Together, they offer a preview of the pressures Taiwan might increasingly face in an era of overlapping geopolitical
RSS