In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) on May 4 announced that the Cabinet would expand its financial relief program with a NT$10,000 grant for eligible applicants. On the first application day, long lines formed outside district and township offices, and since many applicants did not qualify for the grant, disorder broke out, exposing flaws in the government’s policymaking and implementation.
The first problem is the lack of a bottom-up approach with local government participation. Many democratic countries have long since abandoned one-way, top-down thinking, and instead emphasize bottom-up administrative participation.
Taiwan’s highly successful pandemic prevention can be partially attributed to local governments’ proactive responses and advanced deployment.
Despite the central government’s claim that it and local governments are of one mind, the subsidy program was rushed without participation from local governments, which instead became “errand boys” to implement the policy.
Local governments are responsible for implementing the program on the front line, as they better understand their constituents’ needs. The central government should have coordinated with them when formulating the grant program, and it should have launched it only when complementary measures were in place to avoid public complaints.
The central government invites mayors and deputy mayors of Taiwan’s six municipalities to the Executive Yuan’s weekly meeting, and Su should have allowed them to participate on this issue. He was able, but unwilling to do so.
Second, there is a lack of “customer-oriented communication” about the policy. Su used flower sellers and people who advertise in the street as an example of those who would benefit, saying that all people whose income is affected by the pandemic could apply for the grant. Then the public — the external customers — swarmed district and township offices nationwide.
Unfortunately, like the public, civil servants also learned about the program from the news and were unable to explain it to applicants.
Third, there was a lack of empathy in the implementation of the program, as the government failed to streamline administration to simplify the process for applicants. Although Minister Without Portfolio Kung Ming-hsin (龔明鑫) on May 6 proposed a few steps to simplify the application process, public anger had already spread to the central government.
New Taipei Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) was praised for telling the city’s district offices to promptly simplify the application process and pledging to take full responsibility for his decision, while Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) criticized the central government for creating unnecessary problems.
For years, I have promoted “e-government” solutions. The Ministry of Finance, which has access to household income data, has long provided taxpayers with online services for calculating tax filings, so why does it still require people in need to prepare documents and fill out one form after another?
It has been more than 100 days since COVID-19 broke out in Taiwan, and the government has switched from easing restrictions to saving the economy.
The central government should learn from the relief-related commotion. On the basis of participation, communication and empathy, it should cooperate closely with local governments to ensure that its policies benefit those who need it in the next phase of their relief work.
Jack Lee is a professor in National Open University’s public administration department.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.
RSS