The Nikkei Asian Review on March 21 reported that Japan is considering expanding membership of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) at a meeting in Mexico in August, as Tokyo looks to reduce its reliance on China given that the COVID-19 outbreak has resulted in unprecedented supply chain disruptions.
The report said that the Japan-led trade bloc might open up to more Asian economies, such as Taiwan, Thailand, Indonesia and the Philippines. That would be good news for Taiwan, which has long expressed a desire to join the pact, although the meeting could be postponed amid the pandemic.
The pact, renamed CPTPP after the US withdrew from the Trans-Pacific Partnership in 2017, took effect on Dec. 30, 2018, and consists of Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore and Vietnam. In 2017, those economies held a combined GDP of US$10.2 trillion, making up 13.6 percent of the world’s GDP, while Taiwan’s trade with the bloc accounts for more than a quarter of its external trade, government statistics show.
Taiwan has long sought membership in the CPTPP in expectation that inclusion would help upgrade local industries and curb relocation, as well as accelerate foreign investment in Taiwan. However, trade disputes between the US and China and the pandemic have considerably affected the global economy, as well as prompting many nations to rethink the structure and balance of global supply chains.
In this respect, Taiwan could contribute to the CPTPP based on its experience in transforming its economy and developing well-rounded supply chains.
However, Taiwan’s participation is unlikely, as the addition of a new nation requires consensus from all members. Taiwan would first need to file an application and then solicit support from all member economies. The political challenge is more difficult than getting Taiwan’s economic and trade environment ready when it comes to negotiating with each member of the trade pact.
This is significant for Japan, because before Taipei can gain Tokyo’s support, it would have to address the ban on food products from five Japanese prefectures imposed after the 2011 Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear disaster. Other members might also propose their own terms for Taiwan to win their approval.
In addition to the many unknowns in joining the CPTPP, Taiwan’s difficulty in joining the China-backed Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership due to the peculiarities of cross-strait relations and the lack of progress in reaching bilateral free-trade agreements between Taiwan and many of its trading partners have already created disadvantages for Taiwanese businesses in terms of tariffs, which have weakened the appeal of the nation as a production base.
While US-China trade tensions and the pandemic have led some Taiwanese firms to partially move production out of China, they might be forced to relocate again if the government cannot make substantial progress on either the bilateral or regional trade-pact front.
The pandemic and plunging crude oil prices have tipped the global economy, creating a higher risk of recession than in any other period since the 2008 global financial crisis.
At a time when the CPTPP is likely to open for new members, the government must seize the opportunity and take the necessary action to join the bloc, given that the overall atmosphere is improving for Taiwan’s regional and global participation.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS