Thankfully, the Australian police confirmed to the media that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Deputy Secretary-
General Alex Tsai (蔡正元) and Chinese businessman Sun Tianqun (孫天群) had, since the end of last month, used a combination of threats and enticements on self-confessed Chinese spy William Wang Liqiang (王立強).
Had the police not provided this information, Taiwanese might have had their heads turned by the false reports concocted by the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
If the police had not exposed the mendacious script allegedly prepared by Tsai and Sun, the false allegation that Wang had accepted a large sum of money from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have been hyped and turned into a “scandal” serious enough to influence the results of Saturday’s presidential and legislative elections.
At a news conference that Tsai called to tell his side of the story, the arguments he presented did not in any way clarify his relationships with Sun and the CCP.
There is enough information available to expose the narrative of the KMT and the CCP, which has two important parts:
First, Tsai said that Sun and Wang had contacted him on their own initiative. This raises points of doubt that Tsai intentionally concealed. If Wang really did come knocking on Tsai’s door, why would Tsai and Sun need to threaten him and offer him inducements? Also, why would Wang report the matter to authorities in Australia?
Moreover, Chinese authorities said right from the start that Wang was a con artist and not a special agent.
This is a sensitive issue that affects Taiwan’s national security and the geopolitical situation in the Asia-Pacific. Set aside that Sun’s and Tsai’s political standpoints and ideology are in tune with the CCP. If they really did not know each other before this situation arose, and if Tsai agrees with Sun’s statements that Hong Kong-based businessman Xiang Xin (向心) is not a Chinese spymaster, as Wang claims, and Wang himself is a fake spy, why would Tsai stick his neck out to act as Sun’s accomplice by threatening and enticing Wang, and making counterallegations that the DPP was involved?
Clearly, Tsai and Sun know each other very well and are closely connected.
Second, there are complicated relationships involved.
Since Wang applied for political asylum in Australia on Nov. 24 last year, the KMT and CCP have insisted that Wang is a fake spy.
The case has caused serious concern and alarm among the members of the Five Eyes intelligence alliance — the US, the UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. It also explains why nearly 70 percent of Taiwanese are in favor of the Anti-infiltration Act (反滲透法).
The fact that the Australian police stepped in early to spoil the joint conspiracy allegedly prepared by Tsai, Sun and double agents of the KMT and CCP also shows the complicated relationships behind the incident.
Amid such a complex geopolitical situation, why did Tsai and Sun still dare to work together to threaten or entice Wang into retracting his confession before the elections by saying that he is actually a fake communist spy? Why did they concoct the lie that DPP politician Chiou I-jen (邱義仁) was involved and that Wang had accepted a large sum of money from the DPP?
All this shows how far the CCP is prepared to go in its campaign to subvert Taiwan’s democratic order.
Chen Tsai-neng is a doctoral candidate at National Chung Hsing University’s Graduate Institute of International Politics.
Translated by Julian Clegg
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
RSS