Despite long-term support for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) among Aborigines, the party’s final list of legislator-at-large nominees included only one Aboriginal candidate, of the Sediq people, in 28th. That was a great disappointment to Taiwan’s indigenous people.
There were reports that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) had planned to give Tuhi Martukaw of the Puyuma people top spot on its list, which was a comfort for Aborigines.
Unfortunately, the DPP also let us down, as its list included a single Aborigine, Omi Wilang of the Atayal people, in 15th, which leaves it uncertain whether this will give him a legislative seat, as he is among the last of the “safe” positions.
The KMT put Hua Tsen (華真) of the Paiwan people at 28th in 2008 and in 2012. The only time an Aboriginal candidate has been elected as a legislator-at-large was when Chang Jen-hsiang (章仁香) of the Amis people was 11th for the KMT in 2004.
When making its at-large lists, the KMT pays little attention to Aborigines, perhaps because it believes that they are die-hard KMT supporters. It garners at least 65 percent of the Aboriginal vote in every election.
The DPP’s proportion of the Aboriginal vote has never exceeded 20 percent, although it often puts Aborigines on its at-large list. Since the 2004 legislative elections, the party has had Aborigines on its list in almost every election. It also places them higher and sometimes even has two such candidates.
However, when the DPP released its list for January’s elections at a news conference on Nov. 14, Tuhi Martukaw was not on it after initially being slated to have the top spot.
If that situation had remained, the party would have had a good change to win more support from Aborigines, but with the change, it has once again lost our trust.
As for the New Power Party, it failed to nominate any Aborigines this time, despite putting Kawlo Iyun Pacidal of the Amis people at the top of its list four years ago. We have to wait and see what the other parties such as the Taiwan People’s Party and the People First Party do.
At-large nominees are a party’s die-hards. They must obey instructions in every vote at the Legislative Yuan.
Even so, when deciding which names to put on their lists, parties should attach greater importance to disadvantaged and minority groups, instead of using the lists to perpetuate party factions, and bolstering the status of the rich and powerful, and political dynasties.
Nov. 22 was the deadline to register for the legislative elections, but to the great disappointment of Aborigines, the leaders of the major political parties failed to seize the opportunity to reconsider their lists.
When casting party votes on Jan. 11, my fellow Aborigines should make their choice with caution, and they should no longer be deceived by the sweet words of political parties.
Awi Sabou is a member of the Sediq community in Nantou County.
Translated by Eddy Chang
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Nvidia Corp’s plan to build its new headquarters at the Beitou Shilin Science Park’s T17 and T18 plots has stalled over a land rights dispute, prompting the Taipei City Government to propose the T12 plot as an alternative. The city government has also increased pressure on Shin Kong Life Insurance Co, which holds the development rights for the T17 and T18 plots. The proposal is the latest by the city government over the past few months — and part of an ongoing negotiation strategy between the two sides. Whether Shin Kong Life Insurance backs down might be the key factor
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
RSS