Despite long-term support for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) among Aborigines, the party’s final list of legislator-at-large nominees included only one Aboriginal candidate, of the Sediq people, in 28th. That was a great disappointment to Taiwan’s indigenous people.
There were reports that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) had planned to give Tuhi Martukaw of the Puyuma people top spot on its list, which was a comfort for Aborigines.
Unfortunately, the DPP also let us down, as its list included a single Aborigine, Omi Wilang of the Atayal people, in 15th, which leaves it uncertain whether this will give him a legislative seat, as he is among the last of the “safe” positions.
The KMT put Hua Tsen (華真) of the Paiwan people at 28th in 2008 and in 2012. The only time an Aboriginal candidate has been elected as a legislator-at-large was when Chang Jen-hsiang (章仁香) of the Amis people was 11th for the KMT in 2004.
When making its at-large lists, the KMT pays little attention to Aborigines, perhaps because it believes that they are die-hard KMT supporters. It garners at least 65 percent of the Aboriginal vote in every election.
The DPP’s proportion of the Aboriginal vote has never exceeded 20 percent, although it often puts Aborigines on its at-large list. Since the 2004 legislative elections, the party has had Aborigines on its list in almost every election. It also places them higher and sometimes even has two such candidates.
However, when the DPP released its list for January’s elections at a news conference on Nov. 14, Tuhi Martukaw was not on it after initially being slated to have the top spot.
If that situation had remained, the party would have had a good change to win more support from Aborigines, but with the change, it has once again lost our trust.
As for the New Power Party, it failed to nominate any Aborigines this time, despite putting Kawlo Iyun Pacidal of the Amis people at the top of its list four years ago. We have to wait and see what the other parties such as the Taiwan People’s Party and the People First Party do.
At-large nominees are a party’s die-hards. They must obey instructions in every vote at the Legislative Yuan.
Even so, when deciding which names to put on their lists, parties should attach greater importance to disadvantaged and minority groups, instead of using the lists to perpetuate party factions, and bolstering the status of the rich and powerful, and political dynasties.
Nov. 22 was the deadline to register for the legislative elections, but to the great disappointment of Aborigines, the leaders of the major political parties failed to seize the opportunity to reconsider their lists.
When casting party votes on Jan. 11, my fellow Aborigines should make their choice with caution, and they should no longer be deceived by the sweet words of political parties.
Awi Sabou is a member of the Sediq community in Nantou County.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS