Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) is reportedly to soon propose a policy of “paying respect to the sea.” It is good to know that the highest levels of government attach such importance to marine issues.
Taiwan’s has about 1,700km of coastline and about 13,000km2 of coastal land.
Many years of economic development and relaxation of marine regulations have allowed maritime resources to be used in a diverse number of ways, such as for seawalls, national defense, conservation, energy resources, fisheries, transport and recreation.
Some of these uses are mutually conflicting and some did not consider the characteristics of coastal land and resources. This has led to undesirable results, such as competitive, excessive or improper use of those resources.
Problems such as the excessive proportion of artificial coastline, coastal erosion, subsidence, damage to geological landscapes and marine pollution all result from the improper use of marine resources.
The Coastal Zone Management Act (海岸管理法), which was drawn up by the Ministry of the Interior in 2015, has established a management regime for the protection, defense and usage of coastal zones. It serves to effectively resolve conflicts between different users, mitigate effects on the coastal environment and reduce the risk of coastal disasters.
The national spatial plan goes a step further by including waters extending 12 nautical miles (22.2km) from the average high-tide line within the marine resources zone and establishing a regime for the subsequent use of this zone.
The Construction and Planning Agency deserves praise for doing its duty in this respect.
However, marine management is not limited to territorial space. It also includes the use and protection of marine resources, the development of marine industries, maritime safety, safety of marine recreation, prevention of marine pollution, preservation of marine culture and marine education, and so on.
There is an urgent need for the government to systematically establish management regimes governing all these diverse aspects.
The Ocean Affairs Council is duty bound to play the main part in this process. Although the council was established a year-and-a-half ago, hopefully it will go on to exert more energetic governance over the sea and integrate the establishment of Taiwan’s marine management regime.
In 2008, the EU adopted its Marine Strategy Framework Directive, which regards the sea as an important economic asset and pursues the goal of ensuring that Europe’s seas are clean, healthy and productive.
Considering that Taiwan calls itself a maritime nation, it should have the same boldness of vision. The real way to respect the sea is to treat it as an important national asset and establish a management regime to sustainably utilize and protect it.
Chen Chung-ling is a professor in National Cheng Kung University’s Institute of Ocean Technology and Marine Affairs.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
US President Donald Trump recently repeated his claim that “Taiwan stole America’s chip industry,” reigniting public debate on the issue. As a former Taiwanese minister of economic affairs and an entrepreneur deeply involved in semiconductor supply chain development, I feel a responsibility to clarify this misunderstanding. From the perspective of global industrial evolution and the economic principle of comparative advantage, such a statement appears overly simplistic and risks obscuring the essence of the issue. The rise of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry was not built on “replacing America,” but rather emerged as a result of countries pursuing different development paths within the
RSS