Imagine that a person’s brain could be scanned in great detail and recreated in a computer simulation. The person’s mind and memories, emotions, and personality would be duplicated. In effect, a new and equally valid version of that person would exist, in a potentially immortal, digital form.
This futuristic possibility is called mind uploading. The science of the brain and of consciousness increasingly suggests that mind uploading is possible — there are no laws of physics to prevent it.
The technology is likely to be far in our future; it might be centuries before the details are fully worked out — and yet given how much interest and effort is being directed toward the goal, mind uploading seems inevitable.
Illustration: Constance Chou
Of course, we cannot be certain how it might affect our culture, but as the technology of simulation and artificial neural networks shapes up, we can guess what that mind uploading future might be like.
Suppose that one day you go into an uploading clinic to have your brain scanned. We will be generous and pretend the technology works perfectly.
It has been tested and debugged. It captures all your synapses in sufficient detail to recreate your unique mind. It gives that mind a standard-issue, virtual body that is reasonably comfortable, with your face and voice attached, in a virtual environment like a high-quality video game. We will pretend all of this has come true.
Who is that second you?
The first you — we will call it the biological you — has paid a fortune for the procedure and yet you walk out of the clinic just as mortal as when you walked in. You are still a biological being, and eventually you would die. As you drive home, you think: “Well, that was a waste of money.”
At the same time, the simulated you wakes up in a virtual apartment and feels like the same old you. It has a continuity of experience. It remembers walking into the clinic, swiping a credit card, signing a waiver and lying on the table. It feels as though it was anesthetized and then woke up again somewhere else. It has your memories, your personality, your thought patterns and your emotional quirks. It sits up in a new bed and says: “I can’t believe it worked — definitely worth the cost.”
I will not call it an “it” anymore, because that mind is a version of you. We will call it the simulated you. This “Sim You” decides to explore. You step out of your apartment into the sunlight of a perfect day and find a virtual version of New York City. Sounds, smells, sights, people, the feel of the sidewalk underfoot — everything is present, but with less garbage, and the rats are entirely sanitary and put in for local color.
You chat up strangers in a way you would never do in the real New York City, where you would be worried that an impatient pedestrian might punch you in the teeth. Here, you cannot be injured because your virtual body cannot break.
You stop at a cafe and sip a latte. It does not taste right. It does not feel like anything is going into your stomach — and nothing is. The food is not real and you do not have a stomach. It is all a simulation.
The visual detail on the table is imperfect. There is no grittiness to the rust. Your fingers do not have fingerprints — they are smooth, to save memory on fine detail. Breathing does not feel the same. If you hold your breath, you do not get dizzy, because there is no such thing as oxygen in this virtual world.
You find yourself equipped with a complementary simulated smartphone and you call the number that used to be yours — the phone you had with you, just a few hours ago in your experience, when you walked into the clinic.
The biological you answers the telephone.
“Yo,” Sim You says. “It’s me. I mean, it’s you. What’s up?”
“I’m depressed, that’s what. I’m in my apartment eating ice cream,” Bio You says. “I can’t believe I spent all that money for zilch.”
“Zilch?! You would not believe what it’s like online! It’s a fantastic place,” Sim You says. “Remember Kevin, the guy who died of cancer last week? He’s here too! He’s fine, and he still has the same job. He Skypes with his old yoga studio three times a week, to teach his fitness class. His girlfriend in the real world has left him for someone who’s not dead yet. Still, lots of new people to date here.”
I have to resist getting carried away by the humor of the situation.
Underneath the details lies a very real philosophical conundrum that people would eventually have to confront. What is the relationship between Bio You and Sim You?
I prefer a geometric way of thinking about the situation. Imagine that your life is like the rising stalk of the letter “Y.” You are born at the base and as you grow up, your mind is shaped and changed along a trajectory. Then you let yourself be scanned, and from that moment on, the Y has branched. There are now two trajectories, each one equally and legitimately you.
We will say that the left-hand branch is the simulated you and the right-hand branch is the biological you. The part of you that lives indefinitely is represented by both the stem of the Y and the left-hand branch. Just as your childhood self lives on in your adult self, the stem of the Y lives on in the simulated self.
Once the scan is over, the two branches of the Y proceed along different life paths, accumulating different experiences.
The right-hand branch would die. Everything that happens to it after the branching point fails to achieve immortality — unless it chooses to scan itself again, in which case another branch appears and the geometry becomes even more complicated.
What emerges is not a single you, but a topologically intricate version, a hyper you with two or more branches. One of those branches is always going to be mortal and the others have an indefinite lifespan depending on how long the computer platform is maintained.
You might think that since Bio You lives in the real world, and Sim You lives in a virtual world, the two would never meet and therefore should never encounter any complications from coexisting, but these days, who needs to meet in person?
We interact mainly through electronic media anyway. Sim You and Bio You represent two fully functional, interactive and capable instances of you that are competing within the same larger, interconnected, social and economic universe. You could easily find yourselves meeting over video chat.
At the simplest level, mind uploading would preserve people in an indefinite afterlife. Families could have Christmas dinner with Sim Grandma joining in over video chat, the tablet screen propped up at the end of the table — presuming that she has time for her biological family any more, given the rich possibilities in the simulated playground.
It is this kind of idealized afterlife that people have in mind, when they think about the benefits of mind uploading. It is a human-made heaven.
However, unlike a traditional heaven, it is not a separate world. It is seamlessly connected to the real world.
Think of how you interact with the world right now. If you live the typical Western lifestyle, then the smallest part of your life involves interacting with people in the physical space around you. Your connection to the larger world is almost entirely through digital means.
The news comes to you on a screen or through earbuds. Distant locations are real to you mainly because you learn about them through electronic media. Politicians, celebrities, even some friends and family might exist for you mainly through data.
People work in virtual offices where they know their colleagues only through video and text.
Each of us might as well already be in a virtual world, with a steady flow of information passing in and out through CNN, Google, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and text. We live in a kind of multiverse, each of us in a different virtual bubble, the bubbles occasionally merging in real space and then separating, but always connected through the global social network.
If a virtual afterlife is created, the people in it, with the same personalities and needs that they had in real life, would have no reason to isolate themselves from the rest of us. Very little needs to change for them. Socially, politically, economically, the virtual world and the real world would connect into one larger and always expanding civilization. The virtual world might as well be simply another city on Earth, filled with people who have migrated to it.
We have always lived in a world where culture turns over with each generation, but what happens when the older generations never die, but remain just as active in society? There is no reason to think that the living would have any political, economic or intellectual advantage over the simulated.
Think of the jobs that people have in our world. Many of them require physical action and those are the jobs that are likely to be replaced by automatons. Taxi driver? Publicly shared, self-driving vehicles are almost here. Street cleaners? Checkout operators? Construction workers? Pilots? All of these jobs are likely to go the way of the chopping block in the medium to long term. Robotics and artificial intelligence would take them over.
The rest of our jobs — our contributions to the larger world — are done through the mind and if the mind can be uploaded, it can keep doing the same job. A politician can work from cyberspace just as well as from real space — so can a teacher, a manager, a therapist, a journalist, a copy editor or the guy in the complaints department.
The chief executive of a company, a Steve Jobs type who has shaped up a sweet set of neural connections in his brain that makes him exceptional at his work, can manage from a remote, simulated office.
If he must shake hands, he can take temporary possession of a humanoid robot, a kind of shared rent-a-bot, and spend a few hours in the real world, meeting and greeting. Even calling it the “real” world sounds prejudicial to me.
Both worlds would be equally real. Maybe the better term is the “foundation” world and the “cloud” world.
The foundation world would be full of people who are mere youngsters — mainly under the age of 80 — who are still accumulating valuable experience. Their unspoken responsibility would be to gain wisdom and experience before joining the ranks of the cloud world. The balance of power and culture would shift rapidly to the cloud. How could it not?
That is where the knowledge, experience and political connections would accumulate. In that scenario, the foundation world becomes a larval stage for immature minds and the cloud world is where life really begins. Mind uploading could transform our culture and civilization more profoundly than anything in our past.
Michael Graziano is a professor of psychology and neuroscience at Princeton University.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
The arrest in France of Telegram founder and CEO Pavel Durov has brought into sharp focus one of the major conflicts of our age. On one hand, we want privacy in our digital lives, which is why we like the kind of end-to-end encryption Telegram promises. On the other, we want the government to be able to stamp out repugnant online activities — such as child pornography or terrorist plotting. The reality is that we cannot have our cake and eat it, too. Durov last month was charged with complicity in crimes taking place on the app, including distributing child pornography,
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
RSS