The Financial Supervisory Commission last week granted licenses to three Web-only banks, a move that surprised many, as the commission had said earlier that it intended to issue only two in light of an already crowded banking market.
The commission said that a nine-member review panel had made the decision based on the trio’s different operating models and intended client bases, which would boost convenience, meet demand, promote inclusive financing and encourage innovative development and financial technology.
Judging by the experience of Hong Kong, Singapore, Japan and South Korea, the commission believes that having three Web-only banks is viable, as the market share of Internet-based banks in other nations remains low and their impact on traditional banks and market competition is still limited.
The commission also stressed that the three were approved in a fair, just and transparent manner, denying accusations that there were external forces at play in the review process.
Even though some critics remain skeptical about the decision, it is likely that the issuance of the nation’s first virtual-banking licenses will trigger technological innovation and challenge existing banks.
The development of Internet-based banks in Taiwan has moved slower than in other nations due to consumers’ concerns about online transactions, information security and personal data protection.
At present, the Internet services provided by traditional banks are still largely limited to money transfers and balance inquiries. There are few innovative financial applications, while there are disruptive financial instruments across industries and sectors that use artificial intelligence, data analytics and other applications, so when the three new banks begin operations next year, one would expect them to redefine the relationship between banks and clients with innovations.
Internet banks can set different scenarios for retail and corporate banking to serve niche, underserved segments, differentiating themselves from traditional banks.
However, heightened price competition between new banks and existing players is undesirable, as that would undermine core services and profitability.
The planned launch of the Web-only banks will directly affect the nation’s crowded and fragmented banking sector, in which the combined market share of the top three banks is still below 30 percent.
Compared with brick-and-mortar banks, Web-only banks enjoy an advantage in leveraging the large established ecosystems they possess in non-financial industries. For instance, Next Bank, led by Chunghwa Telecom Co, and Line Bank, backed by Line Financial Taiwan Corp, will have the ability to create synergies with their mobile telecom platforms and social networking apps. Moreover, Web-only banks will be more cost-efficient and flexible.
However, in terms of deposits and profitability, it remains to be seen whether Web-only banks can successfully challenge traditional banks given that there has been little impact in Japan in the 18 years since they started there.
The new players will also face large start-up costs, small-scale economies, lower client loyalty and limited profitability, at least in the beginning, but as S&P Global Ratings has suggested, the new entrants and the development of new technologies will change how consumers view and use financial services over the long term, which would ultimately affect the strategic direction of traditional banks.
In the meantime, financial regulators must pay close attention to possible risks associated with virtual banks, including liquidity management, information security, money laundering and compliance issues.
As China steps up a campaign to diplomatically isolate and squeeze Taiwan, it has become more imperative than ever that Taipei play a greater role internationally with the support of the democratic world. To help safeguard its autonomous status, Taiwan needs to go beyond bolstering its defenses with weapons like anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles. With the help of its international backers, it must also expand its diplomatic footprint globally. But are Taiwan’s foreign friends willing to translate their rhetoric into action by helping Taipei carve out more international space for itself? Beating back China’s effort to turn Taiwan into an international pariah
Typhoon Krathon made landfall in southwestern Taiwan last week, bringing strong winds, heavy rain and flooding, cutting power to more than 170,000 homes and water supply to more than 400,000 homes, and leading to more than 600 injuries and four deaths. Due to the typhoon, schools and offices across the nation were ordered to close for two to four days, stirring up familiar controversies over whether local governments’ decisions to call typhoon days were appropriate. The typhoon’s center made landfall in Kaohsiung’s Siaogang District (小港) at noon on Thursday, but it weakened into a tropical depression early on Friday, and its structure
Since the end of the Cold War, the US-China espionage battle has arguably become the largest on Earth. Spying on China is vital for the US, as China’s growing military and technological capabilities pose direct challenges to its interests, especially in defending Taiwan and maintaining security in the Indo-Pacific. Intelligence gathering helps the US counter Chinese aggression, stay ahead of threats and safeguard not only its own security, but also the stability of global trade routes. Unchecked Chinese expansion could destabilize the region and have far-reaching global consequences. In recent years, spying on China has become increasingly difficult for the US
Lately, China has been inviting Taiwanese influencers to travel to China’s Xinjiang region to make films, weaving a “beautiful Xinjiang” narrative as an antidote to the international community’s criticisms by creating a Potemkin village where nothing is awry. Such manipulations appear harmless — even compelling enough for people to go there — but peeling back the shiny veneer reveals something more insidious, something that is hard to ignore. These films are not only meant to promote tourism, but also harbor a deeper level of political intentions. Xinjiang — a region of China continuously listed in global human rights reports —