The army will be able to upgrade its artillery now that the US Department of State has approved a sale to Taiwan of 108 M1A2 Abrams tanks and other defense equipment, the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) reported on July 12.
The military asked to purchase more than 100 155mm M109A6 Paladin self-propelled howitzers from the US for about NT$30 billion (US$966 million) and submitted its plans to the Executive Yuan for review.
It wants the howitzers to replace its aging M109A2 and M109A5s, M110A2 8-inch self-propelled howitzers and 155mm M114 towed howitzers.
My initial reaction to the news was a mixture of delight and concern. Delight that the generals have finally decided to retire aging artillery pieces that have been in service for 20 to 50 years; concern because tracked, self-propelled artillery — which Paladin howitzers are — are comparatively expensive.
There will only be enough to replace approximately one-eighth of the army’s artillery pieces. This is utterly inadequate. As the government has not officially placed an order with the US, there is still time to learn from other nations’ experiences and adjust the procurement plan to take into account developing trends.
Taiwan has the highest density of public roads of almost any country in the world.
Ministry of Transport and Communications data from 2015 showed that Taiwan has 41,950km of public roads, or 11.2km of road for every square kilometer of land. Taiwan’s density is higher than that of many other developed nations, eclipsed only by Singapore, the Netherlands and Belgium. Given this, generals should not overlook wheeled self-propelled artillery for the army’s infantry and mechanized artillery divisions.
The greatest advantage of the wheeled options is cost: They are not only cheaper, but also more economical to maintain, while they are perfectly suited to Taiwan’s high road density.
Many years ago, the army considered buying South African-produced G5 wheeled howitzers, which have twice the effective range of its M109A3/A5s and M114s.
Unfortunately, after South Africa broke diplomatic relations with Taiwan, the purchase plan fell by the wayside.
A US Defense Security Cooperation Agency report details how last year Saudi Arabia upgraded to Paladin howitzers at a cost of US$1.3 billion. As Taiwan plans to buy more than 100, the total would be close to NT$30 billion.
The French-made CAESAR and Israeli-produced ATMOS 2000 are the world’s best-selling wheeled self-propelled howitzers. Both are nearly identical to the US-made Paladins — the design of which dates back to the 1960s — but the CAESAR and ATMOS 2000 are much better value for money.
In 2016, Thailand’s military selected the ATMOS 2000 and in 2017, Denmark chose a modified 8x8 version of the CAESAR for its armed forces. Israel’s military chose the ATMOS 2000.
Both of these can be purchased for one-fifth the price of a Paladin. For about the same outlay, Taiwan’s military would be able to replace more than half of its artillery pieces with either the CAESAR or ATMOS 2000.
This is surely a more rational way to modernize Taiwan’s outdated artillery.
Chang Feng-lin is a doctoral student.
Translated by Edward Jones
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
RSS