The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) held its National Policy Vision on Television in Taichung on June 29, its second event to showcase the party’s presidential primary contenders. The topics included youth, society, culture and education.
One of the candidates, Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘), betrayed his lack of political experience by voicing some wild, unfunded policy pledges.
Gou started off talking about fiscal policy, claiming that the nation is about to go bankrupt. He followed this by promising to provide free kindergartens for all children up to the age of six, explaining that he would fund this by creating a new revenue stream using “the nation’s big data resources.”
Former New Taipei City mayor Eric Chu (朱立倫) then made Gou look rather foolish by pointing out that a government’s balance sheet is different from a company’s.
The nation’s assets far outstrip its liabilities, and its finances are in far better shape than many comparable countries, Chu said.
There are only two explanations as to why an experienced entrepreneur like Gou would conflate the balance sheet of a nation with that of a company. Either he does not know what a balance sheet is or he tried to deceive the public for some particular purpose.
This lack of understanding is confirmed when examining Gou’s policy pledge of state-funded kindergartens.
There are about 1.4 million children aged one to six in Taiwan. If all of these children are to be looked after by the state, what does this mean in practical terms?
For the sake of argument, the government could give each family NT$20,000 (US$641) a month for each eligible child, which would cost it NT$336 billion a year.
Since the central government’s annual budget stands at NT$2 trillion and local government budgets total NT$1 trillion, Gou’s idea would increase government expenditure by more than 10 percent.
Does Gou really not see how difficult that would be? It is a simple calculation, but a closer look is enough to know who is speaking without thinking.
Gou says that the funding for childcare would come from wealth created using the nation’s big data resources, which is frightening. For example, Taiwanese big data that international businesses are interested in is the National Health Insurance data, which includes all information about the health of Taiwanese — and foreigners living or studying here — a highly sensitive privacy issue.
This is why every past president has placed severe restrictions on the data and only allowed a small number of academic studies to gain access to part of it.
Is Gou perhaps thinking about emulating the Chinese government’s big data exchange — where businesses can trade data — and selling Taiwanese’s data to private businesses?
Even leaving aside the question of how sufficient funding could be created from such data, Gou would have to explain how the data would be used, how privacy would be protected and how he would build public trust in such an institution.
If he cannot provide such complementary measures, waving big data around is just another political ruse.
When Gou — an outstanding entrepreneur — enters a presidential election, it is both new and refreshing, and it creates expectations. However, his status also means that no one has ever examined his personal beliefs before, and we have only heard bits and pieces of what he really thinks and wants.
Gou has participated in two KMT policy debates, but he still cannot provide a clear, in-depth account of his childcare policy.
He has also been unable to dispel even the most fundamental doubts, not to mention transforming it into a policy highlight. There is not enough time for Gou to do all the reading up he should do.
Wei Shui-hsiu is a university professor.
Translated by Edward Jones and Perry Svensson
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which