When Google’s boss sits down with a top US military official on Wednesday, the conversation will likely center on Google’s presence in China — particularly a lab that might be more trouble for the company than it is worth.
Sundar Pichai, chief executive officer of Alphabet’s Google, is to meet in Washington with General Joseph Dunford, chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, according to a person familiar with the situation.
The Internet giant extended the invitation after criticism from Dunford about Google’s artificial intelligence (AI) work in China, which he said “indirectly benefits the Chinese military.”
Illustration: Yusha
Dunford cited an AI lab that Google opened in Beijing in late 2017.
Less than two years later, the small office is causing a massive headache for Google, sitting at the locus of a collision between the company’s global ambitions and the US military’s mounting unease over China’s technical might.
A spokesman for the US Department of Defense confirmed that Dunford is scheduled to meet with a senior Google official this week, but declined to provide further details.
Representatives from Google did not respond to requests for comment.
Google will also brief staff of the US Senate’s Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs today about its work in China and with the Pentagon, according to a spokesman for the committee chairman, US Senator Ron Johnson.
The conflict is a risk to Google’s cloud-computing business, which relies on the company’s AI prowess and is a major source of future revenue growth outside of advertising.
The Pentagon and China are huge potential buyers of Internet-based services, a multibillion-dollar market. Google’s chief rivals in the cloud business, Amazon.com and Microsoft Corp, have aggressively courted both buyers.
However, Google has not. In the past year, the Mountain View, California-based company bowed out of an AI contract with the Pentagon while expanding its search for new businesses in China.
Those simultaneous moves were met with fevered backlash in Washington.
Lawmakers grilled Google about its plans in China and the Pentagon, concerned about China’s national investment in AI technology, has launched a public campaign to shame the company.
Two weeks ago, Google issued a statement saying it “was not working with the Chinese military” after US President Donald Trump criticized the company in a tweet on March 16.
Google withdrew its search engine and most other services from China in 2010, citing censorship concerns, but has maintained advertising sales and software-engineering offices there.
By the time Google opened its Beijing lab, the company had just sealed a deal that underscored its willingness to work with the US military.
In September 2017, Google was awarded portions of a contract for Project Maven, a Pentagon initiative to use image-recognition technology to analyze drone footage, according to a report in Gizmodo.
Two months later, Google announced the Beijing AI center. Like many decisions at the company, this was driven by a desire to hire the best coders. Google has spent the past five years signaling to investors and the public that it is the world’s leading AI company, but it needs talented engineers to maintain this lead.
“AI and its benefits have no borders,” Li Feifei (李飛飛), the Google executive then running the Beijing lab, wrote in a 2017 blog post announcing the center. “And we want to work with the best AI talent, wherever that talent is, to achieve it.”
Technicians in AI are particularly rare and expensive, and many of them are in China.
Li, a Chinese-born computer scientist, cited a statistic that almost half of the research in scientific journals on AI came from Chinese authors.
At the time, Li ran research for Google’s cloud division, and she placed Li Jia (李佳), one of her deputies, in charge of the Beijing center.
Google has since held talks about starting to sell its cloud services in China, Bloomberg News reported in August last year.
So far, the company has mostly given away technology free.
A main focus of Google’s AI lab is supporting TensorFlow, an open-source coding library that lets engineers and companies more easily run AI programs that automate tasks or handle reams of data.
For Google, the tool is a critical way to gain the allegiance of software developers, who might end up paying Google for cloud services later.
Last year, Amazon and Microsoft announced their own AI labs in China. Unlike Google, those two companies already sell cloud services in China. Amazon has even promoted its government work — an Amazon Web Services presentation from last year lists 33 public-sector customers in China.
Amazon and Microsoft have also pursued cloud deals with the US military, while Google retreated from the Maven contract after employee protests.
Some Google engineers even refused to work on an “air gap” security feature last year that would have helped the company compete for sensitive military contracts.
“This is not about me and Google,” Dunford said on March 21 at an event hosted by the Atlantic Council think tank. “This is about us looking at the second and third-order effects of our business ventures in China, Chinese form of government and the impact it’s going to have on the United States’ ability to maintain a competitive military advantage.”
A Pentagon spokesman said that Dunford does not have any meetings planned with other technology companies at this time.
As for Google’s Beijing lab, its founding managers have left. The Web site for the lab describes it as working on education initiatives, “user experience” and the development of Tensorflow.
Just over two weeks ago, the Web site offered another description, according to a version of the page saved by the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine: “We’re developing a world-class research effort dedicated to creating artificial intelligence solutions to real-world problems.”
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
RSS