A report released last week by the International Institute for Management Development ranked the quality of Taiwan’s talent pool 27th in the global marketplace, down four notches from last year. Government officials must be feeling the heat after the institute’s June report ranked Taiwan’s digital competitiveness 16th, down four notches, and the May report ranked the nation’s competitiveness 17th out of 63 major economies, down three notches and the lowest since 2009.
Last week’s report, which evaluates the skill of 63 countries in attracting, developing and retaining talent, attributed the drop in Taiwan’s ranking to its failure to stop the brain drain and its inability to attract foreign professionals, although Taiwan ranked fourth in the Asia-Pacific region after Singapore (13th), Hong Kong (18th) and Malaysia (22nd).
The Democratic Progressive Party administration, which has eased immigration requirements and lowered income taxes for foreign professionals, has ample room to improve before standing a chance of topping the institute’s rankings.
Recruiting and cultivating talent is not easy. Predicting the outcome of easing regulations on the recruitment of foreign talent and of increasing investment in education to develop a skilled workforce is difficult, but Taiwan could learn from Singapore, which excels at making the local business environment attractive to skilled talent and at tapping into the global talent pool.
The Singaporean government prioritizes learning, having for years spent about 20 percent of its budget on education. It promotes lifelong learning and invests in vocational training, so that people can meet future career goals. It combines high pay, good housing, low taxes and friendly immigration laws to attract and retain foreign professionals. Singaporean workers boast good foreign-language skills and international experience, while the city-state offers exchange opportunities for industry professionals from other nations.
This talent strategy holds lessons for Taiwan.
Singapore’s all-out effort to diversify industry has turned it into a global financial hub in Asia and earned it a global footing in electronics, biomedical and petrochemical manufacturing, not only generating balanced economic development, but also creating a public relations cycle that attracts additional talent from abroad.
President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration, in promoting the “five plus two” innovative industries over the past two years, has sought to stimulate the economy. The government has decided to raise the salaries of the public sector by 3 percent and increase the minimum wage by 5 percent, but the brain drain problem persists. Generally, low wages remain a focus of voters and are the main culprit behind Tsai’s poor approval ratings.
Ignoring the competitiveness of Taiwan’s talent pool will see its global ranking continue to slip. The questions of how to encourage companies to offer decent pay and how to create an environment preferred by foreign professionals will continue to put pressure on the government, which needs to take the steps necessary for success.
Saturday’s nine-in-one local elections showed that many people are frustrated with Tsai’s administration on many fronts. They do not feel that policies are helping their daily lives. Policymakers must solve the problem of low wages and implement strategies to cultivate and recruit talent ahead of the presidential and legislative elections two years from now.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS