A report released last week by the International Institute for Management Development ranked the quality of Taiwan’s talent pool 27th in the global marketplace, down four notches from last year. Government officials must be feeling the heat after the institute’s June report ranked Taiwan’s digital competitiveness 16th, down four notches, and the May report ranked the nation’s competitiveness 17th out of 63 major economies, down three notches and the lowest since 2009.
Last week’s report, which evaluates the skill of 63 countries in attracting, developing and retaining talent, attributed the drop in Taiwan’s ranking to its failure to stop the brain drain and its inability to attract foreign professionals, although Taiwan ranked fourth in the Asia-Pacific region after Singapore (13th), Hong Kong (18th) and Malaysia (22nd).
The Democratic Progressive Party administration, which has eased immigration requirements and lowered income taxes for foreign professionals, has ample room to improve before standing a chance of topping the institute’s rankings.
Recruiting and cultivating talent is not easy. Predicting the outcome of easing regulations on the recruitment of foreign talent and of increasing investment in education to develop a skilled workforce is difficult, but Taiwan could learn from Singapore, which excels at making the local business environment attractive to skilled talent and at tapping into the global talent pool.
The Singaporean government prioritizes learning, having for years spent about 20 percent of its budget on education. It promotes lifelong learning and invests in vocational training, so that people can meet future career goals. It combines high pay, good housing, low taxes and friendly immigration laws to attract and retain foreign professionals. Singaporean workers boast good foreign-language skills and international experience, while the city-state offers exchange opportunities for industry professionals from other nations.
This talent strategy holds lessons for Taiwan.
Singapore’s all-out effort to diversify industry has turned it into a global financial hub in Asia and earned it a global footing in electronics, biomedical and petrochemical manufacturing, not only generating balanced economic development, but also creating a public relations cycle that attracts additional talent from abroad.
President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration, in promoting the “five plus two” innovative industries over the past two years, has sought to stimulate the economy. The government has decided to raise the salaries of the public sector by 3 percent and increase the minimum wage by 5 percent, but the brain drain problem persists. Generally, low wages remain a focus of voters and are the main culprit behind Tsai’s poor approval ratings.
Ignoring the competitiveness of Taiwan’s talent pool will see its global ranking continue to slip. The questions of how to encourage companies to offer decent pay and how to create an environment preferred by foreign professionals will continue to put pressure on the government, which needs to take the steps necessary for success.
Saturday’s nine-in-one local elections showed that many people are frustrated with Tsai’s administration on many fronts. They do not feel that policies are helping their daily lives. Policymakers must solve the problem of low wages and implement strategies to cultivate and recruit talent ahead of the presidential and legislative elections two years from now.
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
RSS