Malaysia is just a few months or even weeks away from its most contentious election in decades.
Mahathir Mohamad — Malaysia’s longest-serving prime minister, whose rule ended in 2003 — is, at 92, working with opposition figures he once repressed to prevent his former protege, controversial Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak, from securing another term.
However, breaking the 61-year winning streak of Mahathir’s former party, the United Malays National Organization (UMNO), is not going to be easy.
The pundits are still betting on Najib, with one pollster predicting that the incumbent could regain a two-thirds parliamentary majority, enabling him to amend the constitution.
Mahathir has just a few months to change the political dynamic, by leading the opposition coalition, Pakatan Harapan (PH), and replacing the Pan-Malaysia Islamic Party (PAS) with his new party, the Malaysia United Indigenous Party (PPBM), as the primary alternative to UMNO.
While the PAS has only about 15 percent electoral support, it has managed to push the UMNO to implement elements of its nationalist-religious agenda.
TOXIC ONE-UPMANSHIP
However, a strong enough showing by PH in the next election would expose the PAS as politically dispensable, potentially freeing Malaysia from a toxic game of Muslim one-upmanship.
The impact of that game should not be underestimated.
In recent years, religious intolerance has been on the rise in once-secular Malaysia.
For example, the Arabic word for God, Allah, widely used by Arab and Indonesian Christians, is now reserved for Muslim use only.
More alarming, the Malaysian Ministry of Home Affairs has banned a wide range of books, from the Indonesian translation of Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species to the writings of the Islam-friendly Western academics John Esposito and Karen Armstrong.
The rise of a strict and exclusivist Islam in Malaysia reflects international trends and domestic dynamics.
Ethnic-majority Malays — who were marginalized during colonial times, but now enjoy constitutionally guaranteed preferential treatment in the economy and education — must, by definition, be Muslim. The persistence of their favored status hinges on the UMNO’s political dominance, or so UMNO claims.
While early UMNO leaders were anti-clerical, the party’s success in eliminating its leftist and liberal rivals left PAS as the face of the ethnic Malay opposition.
When the modernist Mahathir came to power in 1981, Islamism became the PAS’ most effective ideological weapon against the UMNO.
And, indeed, the PAS leader, Hadi Awang, then a young and charismatic cleric, advocated a radical stance, labeling any Muslim who supported the UMNO an “infidel,” because the UMNO government had supposedly “perpetuated the colonial constitution, infidel laws and pre-Islamic rules.”
Hadi’s message helped to create a deep divide between the two “kinds” of Muslims, to the extent that villages would have two mosques, two cemeteries, and two clerics to lead prayers and officiate at ceremonies.
However, where Hadi did the most damage was in undermining the legitimacy of Malaysia’s post-colonial state and social structures. When Malaysia was under British rule, it faced mass immigration of ethnic Chinese and Indians, and the emergence of a Christian native minority on the island of Borneo.
REVISIONISM
From a Muslim nationalist’s perspective, pluralism — together with secularism and democracy — were colonial impositions. Full decolonization would demand restoration of the dominance of Islam and Muslims.
According to this narrative, the Ottoman Empire offers a model of segregated, unequal, but peaceful coexistence of multiple ethno-religious communities. Minorities lived autonomously in their millets, not as equal citizens, but as dhimmis, or protected minorities.
Having once championed the establishment of a full-fledged Muslim state, the PAS now demands at least expanding Shariah and elevating the status of the Syariah court system, which has limited jurisdiction over Muslims’ personal and family matters, to that of the civil courts.
As the PAS’ brand of Muslim religious nationalism has increasingly overridden the UMNO’s Malay ethno-nationalism, these goals have gained the support of a growing number of Muslims.
While not known to be religious, Mahathir in 1982 shrewdly co-opted Hadi’s more charismatic and visionary contemporary, Anwar Ibrahim, to spearhead the UMNO’s own Islamization projects.
From Islamic higher education to Islamic banking to religious bureaucracy, Mahathir and Anwar stole the PAS’ religious thunder — that is, until the UMNO split.
In 1998, Mahathir imprisoned Anwar, who had tried to replace him. After that, the PAS absorbed many of Anwar’s followers, expanding its influence from its stronghold in the north to the entire country.
Since the 2013 election, when Najib lost the popular vote, but clung to power thanks to electoral gerrymandering, he has worked to bring Hadi on side, for example, by facilitating the potential introduction of harsh hudud punishments (mandated by God under Islamic law) for crimes like adultery, drinking and apostasy.
It was a Machiavellian masterstroke that not only drew the PAS out of the opposition coalition, but also led Hadi to defend the scandal-plagued Najib.
SEAT STRATEGY
The PAS has announced plans to contest about 60 percent of parliamentary constituencies. This might siphon Malay votes from PH, giving the UMNO many narrow victories.
If the turnout among Malays is low, PH will suffer more than Najib, who could end up winning more seats with even fewer votes than in 2013.
As for the PAS, its continued political relevance hinges on eliminating the threat posed by Mahathir and its own splinter party, Amanah, formed by pro-Anwar moderates.
If Mahathir cannot secure one-third of the seats in parliament, the PAS can claim that it is indispensable, even if it loses every constituency.
In such a scenario, no Malay opposition leader would dare denounce the PAS’ Muslim nationalism. The UMNO, despite its electoral victory, would have even less of the moral courage needed to block the PAS agenda.
If Mahathir does secure one-third of the parliament, Malaysian politics will undergo significant changes, even if the UMNO remains technically in charge. If Amanah can supplant the PAS as the main Muslim party, the trend toward religious extremism would likely be reversed.
If the PPBM is established as a rival defender of Malays’ favored status, the UMNO would lose its monopoly on the issue, making Malaysian politics more competitive.
So far, Malaysia’s nonagenarian comeback kid has been making inroads in many UMNO and PAS constituencies.
However, Malays alone will not decide the outcome of his battle with the PAS and Najib. As many marginal constituencies are ethnically mixed, low turnout among non-Malays might help the PAS — and hurt Malaysia.
Wong Chin-Huat is a political scientist at the Penang Institute in Malaysia.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
RSS