It has been over for more than 40 years, the war that most in the US simply call Vietnam, but the Vietnamese refer to as their Resistance War Against America.
Yet, it lingers in so many ways, as was apparent last week when US Secretary of Defense James Mattis dropped in for a couple of days of defense diplomacy with a former enemy.
Although he never served in Vietnam and had not previously visited the country, Mattis has said that he learned under a lot of US Marines who did.
In his meeting with Vietnamese government leaders, Mattis’ focus was on a peaceful future, not the bloody past.
Still, the legacy of the conflict that divided the US and ultimately unified Vietnam confronted Mattis almost immediately after his arrival on Wednesday as he visited a US office that oversees the search for US servicemen’s remains still missing from the war.
More than 1,200 US service members are unaccounted for in Vietnam and 350 more are missing in Laos, Cambodia and China, according to the Pentagon’s POW/MIA Accounting Agency. That accounting effort, decades in the making and dependent on cooperation from Hanoi, is likely to continue for decades.
Later, while talking to his Vietnamese counterpart, Mattis was presented with photo identification cards of two US servicemen from the war. Details were not made public.
More than 58,000 US service members were killed in the war, including more than 1,200 in Cambodia and Laos.
Estimates of the number of Vietnamese killed vary widely, from about 2 million to nearly twice that.
For the Vietnamese, the war was a continuation of their fight for independence from French colonial masters and it was quickly followed by a border war with China in 1979. The country reunified and remains communist, although it has opened up to foreign investment. Hanoi is a bustling, vibrant capital city.
Among Vietnam’s other reminders of the war: environmental damage and unexploded mines. Vietnamese still suffer from the effects of herbicides, including Agent Orange, sprayed by US forces to defoliate the countryside.
“We’re still remediating the effects of the war,” Mattis told reporters on Thursday as he flew out of the country.
The US government has helped clean up contamination from bases US forces used before completing their withdrawal in 1975.
Last year, the US and Vietnam finished the first phase of dioxin cleanup at Danang airport.
Remarkably, given this history, Vietnam said during Mattis’ visit that it may permit a US Navy aircraft carrier to make a port visit in March — something that has never happened in the post-war period.
Just down the street from the hotel where Mattis stayed is Hoa Lo Prison, known to the US service members who spent part of the war there as the “Hanoi Hilton.”
Inside are dark reminders of the suffering, the sacrifice and the shackles — not just of those from the US who were held there, but also Vietnamese imprisoned in earlier decades by the French.
One of those US prisoners was US Senator John McCain, shot down on a bombing mission over Hanoi in 1967, before the US anti-war movement was in full swing. Along the lake from which a badly injured McCain was recovered by his captors stands a concrete marker depicting the captured pilot and noting that his navy plane was one of several shot down that day.
Mattis’ motorcade drove by the McCain marker as the Pentagon boss made his way to a lakeside pagoda to show his respect for Vietnamese culture.
He told the monk there that he enjoyed the serene setting.
“Beautiful. Peaceful. It makes you think more deeply,” Mattis said.
By coincidence, Mattis’ visit came just days before the Vietnamese marked the 50th anniversary of the Tet offensive. That series of assaults by the North Vietnamese was timed to coincide with Tet, the Lunar New Year holiday, on Jan. 31, 1968. Militarily, it was a failure, but the offensive marked a turning point in the war, because it punctured US hopes of certain and swift victory. After Tet, the US began to focus less on how to win and more on how to get out.
Even with past hostilities in mind, Mattis said his visit made clear that those in the US and Vietnamese have shared interests that in some cases predate the Vietnam War.
“Neither of us liked being colonized,” he said.
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
RSS