Tucked in his cramped clothing stall in an enormous Thai mall, Pirumchai Asiram sits on a plastic chair flanked by two worlds — bright, vibrantly colored shirts and dresses to his right, neat stacks of somber apparel in blacks and whites to his left. Ask him which sells better and he will smile.
“Not these,” he says emphatically, pointing to the loud clothing. “These brighter things we sell for foreigners. Thai people, they don’t wear this kind of design since the king passed away.”
Walk the bargain clothing stalls in MBK Center and you will hear quite a bit of this.
At the Orchid clothing store, vendor Arunee Narasri says shops are selling up to 10,000 baht (US$301) a day in bargain black clothing.
Supak Sonpech, who sells black-and-white college uniforms, says it has become everyone’s go-to purchase: “When I go out to buy clothes now, I don’t look at anything, but black and white.”
As the clothing stalls of MBK Center go, so goes the Thai capital.
The muted colors of mourning have settled over Bangkok once again as the nation marks a year since the death of its beloved monarch, Thai King Bhumibol Adulyadej, and prepares for the national spectacle of his cremation tomorrow.
Walking once-color-drenched streets evokes the moment when the Technicolor-soaked land of Oz ebbs back into the blacks and grays of Kansas.
“The fashion itself hasn’t really changed, but the whole color tone of the city has,” says Kotchamon Arsa, owner of a Bangkok shop called Southern Star, which overflows with hundreds of pairs of blue jeans.
She says that people are still buying them, but favoring darker hues of denim to pair with black shirts.
“People still love fashion,” she says. “We’re just using more appropriate tones.”
To understand what is taking place this month, let us flash back to Oct. 13 last year, when the overwhelmingly beloved king, also known as Rama IX, died at age 88.
The nation immediately went into a period of mourning, which played out on the streets of Bangkok in very visible ways. In a matter of days, the city’s entire color palette shifted.
Black-and-white bunting went up on walls. Colors drained from public-facing screens, from automated teller machines to electronic billboards to commuter-rail signs. Google Thailand replaced its vibrant homepage with blacks and grays.
However, most of all, it was the apparel that changed — for men and women alike.
A city typically festooned with brightly colored commuters and pedestrians took on a more somber feel. It was not that absolutely everyone wore black — although some who did not found themselves castigated — but it, and white, became the dominant colors.
Dyeing stations popped up around town so people could turn loud clothing into more muted outfits. The pro-monarchy national government encouraged fabric manufacturers to step up production of black textiles and warned against price-gouging. Heads of offices were expected to wear black; in places where white shirts were expected, black armbands made the same statement.
It was not that no one had worn black before — although the capital’s tropical climate impacted such decisions — it was that the shift became a statement, a matter of discussion, a symbol of respect. People did genuinely love Rama IX, but at the same time, no one wanted to be seen as disrespectful.
In the intervening months between the intensive mourning period after the king’s death and a year later, color crept back into the city, although observation suggests that it never quite came back entirely.
On one recent morning, when a door opened on Bangkok’s busy BTS Skytrain to disgorge commuters, 18 of 20 people getting off the train wore various permutations of black, one notable exception being Buddhist monks, still wearing their saffron robes.
However, since the beginning of this month, more muted colors have returned with even more vigor. A flier is circulating that depicts 25 muted hues — from light browns to dark greens and, of course, black — that are considered appropriate for the month.
Despite the official flexibility, black dominates, and it is hard not to wonder whether the change will endure after the cremation tomorrow, particularly since many less wealthy people might not have money to bring back a more colorful wardrobe.
Officially, the government has given its approval for a return to earlier style.
“After the mourning period has ended, people can return to their colored clothes, wearing whatever they would have before Oct. 13 last year,” said Thongthong Chandrangsu, an expert on royal traditions and a member of the funeral organizing committee. “We have to understand that this is also part of a tradition as well.”
However, Pear Kulthanan, a fashionable 20-something Thai woman who has spent a great deal of time abroad, does not expect a sea change.
“Unless the fashion trend is all-black, I don’t think people will continue to wear monochrome colors unless they [were] already wearing it before the mourning,” she says. “Fashion in Thailand is influenced mostly by [South] Korea and Japan. If they start wearing black, you would start to see people wearing more black.”
However, there is, perhaps, an additional dimension to it all — a political dimension that transcends pure protocol.
Paul Chambers, a lecturer at Naresuan University’s College of ASEAN Community Studies, has noticed an increase in the concentration of black clothing as Thais get geographically closer to the king — more in areas nearer to Bangkok, even more in the capital itself and the most in the part of the city around the palace.
Chambers says that Bangkok’s black saturation could continue after the cremation, because of both affection for the departed Rama IX and considerations for his son, the new king, Rama X.
“I wouldn’t be surprised if the powers that be would want people to wear black, maybe next year, maybe for a few more years, just to show the connection, the transition between this king and the next,” Chambers says. “There is certainly this engine that drives adulation for the traditional institution.”
Although many expect a colorful Bangkok to return, Asiram sees it differently.
“I think the black will stay,” he says. “People love the king a lot. Even after the funeral, I think the city will still look sad.”
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
On May 13, the Legislative Yuan passed an amendment to Article 6 of the Nuclear Reactor Facilities Regulation Act (核子反應器設施管制法) that would extend the life of nuclear reactors from 40 to 60 years, thereby providing a legal basis for the extension or reactivation of nuclear power plants. On May 20, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) legislators used their numerical advantage to pass the TPP caucus’ proposal for a public referendum that would determine whether the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant should resume operations, provided it is deemed safe by the authorities. The Central Election Commission (CEC) has
When China passed its “Anti-Secession” Law in 2005, much of the democratic world saw it as yet another sign of Beijing’s authoritarianism, its contempt for international law and its aggressive posture toward Taiwan. Rightly so — on the surface. However, this move, often dismissed as a uniquely Chinese form of legal intimidation, echoes a legal and historical precedent rooted not in authoritarian tradition, but in US constitutional history. The Chinese “Anti-Secession” Law, a domestic statute threatening the use of force should Taiwan formally declare independence, is widely interpreted as an emblem of the Chinese Communist Party’s disregard for international norms. Critics
RSS