As Typhoon Nesat approached Taiwan on Saturday, it caused floods in Pingtung County. To make sure I could attend an international conference on Sunday, I traveled north from Tainan earlier than planned and stayed the night in New Taipei City.
With the typhoon landing on Saturday night, the wind grew.
I worried that there would be super-strong winds on Sunday and that it would be declared a holiday.
Local government leaders were doubtless worried that the typhoon would cause grievous damage and provoke public resentment, so, to avoid the traffic and safety problems that the storm might cause, all municipalities announced that work and classes would be canceled on Sunday.
However, when I got up early on Sunday morning, the sky was clear and sunny, with a mild breeze and no rain. At first I thought we must be in the eye of the storm, but after quite a long time the weather did not worsen and the sky was cloudless as far as the eye could see.
I checked for news about where Nesat was headed, only to find that it had already moved far away. Disappointingly, the international conference had already been called off.
If typhoon holidays were a bit more flexible, such disappointments could be avoided.
The money needed to invite international academics had already been spent, so if there were no worries about safety, it would make sense to go ahead and hold the event. However, the rules about typhoon holidays leave little room for maneuvering.
If the system remains unchanged, there will be no end to the problem of misjudged decisions about typhoon days off.
It would make sense for the economic functioning of society to improve the decisionmaking mechanism for typhoon holidays.
When local government leaders announce a day off because of a typhoon, they could add a supplementary notice saying, for example, that if there is no wind and rain at 7am the next morning and if people are not in danger, then different government departments can decide what to do. This would prevent mistaken or misjudged decisions about typhoon holidays.
This is by no means the first time that a misjudged decision has been made about a typhoon holiday. In the past, people have tended to blame inaccurate weather forecasts, in some cases leaving officials at the Central Weather Bureau with no option but to tender their resignations.
A more reasonable explanation would be that the weather is always changing, so that while some aspects of it can be predicted, others cannot easily be forecast with 100 percent accuracy. That is why atmospheric sciences speak of a “butterfly effect”: The idea that a butterfly’s wings disturbing the air in Beijing can affect the weather in New York.
One example of this unpredictability took place in southern Taiwan a few years ago when heavy rainfall set in early one morning, but local government leaders had not made a timely announcement that work and classes would be canceled.
The officials were immediately taken to task on Internet forums by people saying that the decision to announce a typhoon holiday had been made too late for them to act accordingly. Following that experience, decisionmaking on typhoon holidays has become increasingly “efficient.”
If announcements are made earlier, there are likely to be more instances of misjudged typhoon holidays. This is not a normal state of affairs, because besides the weather being difficult to predict 100 percent accurately, geographical factors make it even harder to make across-the-board decisions.
For example New Taipei City is far from Tainan, Kaohsiung and Pingtung County, so the weather in these places can be different, making misjudgements even more likely.
Perhaps the public expects and depends on the government, including local leaders, to decide typhoon holidays as early and quickly as possible. This abnormal “public opinion phenomenon” is seen as normal in Taiwan, but this characteristic of our political culture is unique in the international community. For example, in the US and Japan — which are advanced countries — they only have rules for canceling lessons to ensure schoolchildren’s safety, not for canceling work.
An ideal system for making decisions about typhoon holidays should be flexible. It should allow individuals, departments and businesses to make their own decisions about whether to cancel work, depending on their particular weather conditions, rather than having local governments shoulder all the responsibility.
Local leaders are not weather experts, so more flexible systems for deciding typhoon holidays are surely the right way to go.
Yang Yung-nane is a professor in the Department of Political Science and Graduate Institute of Political Economy at National Cheng Kung University.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS