Fighting or whining?
Wednesday last week’s pension reform protest from supposedly the most civil and educated group of people has reminded us of the Sunflower movement, which saw the participation of college students and professors from prestigious schools.
How these two groups of intellectuals expressed their discontent with policies prompts us to evaluate “protest” itself: Were the protesters fighting for a good cause or simply whining?
Do we apply different standards of “civil disobedience” to justify the Sunflower movement and the pension reform protest? Do we tend to glorify youngsters’ deeds and stigmatize the retirees living on pensions? What is the line between being brave and being rude? Is guarding personal well-being less important than maintaining collective interests?
Pension reform protesters are persistent and unapologetic, because they wonder what is wrong with fighting for one’s own benefits, which the government once promised.
It is human nature to have a sense of deprivation when personal interests are being hurt. However, in this case, this fear is not justified because the reformed pension funds can still sustain one’s “basic need” for retirement.
Taiwan Education Retirees Association spokesman Hsiao Chiu-hua (蕭秋華) stressed that there are more people struggling to live on their pension, but illustrated his “inconvenience” by talking about the cost of attending his son’ s graduation ceremony in the US and neglected mentioning more promising financial prospects after pension reform.
The astonishing remarks made by Wu Wan-gu (吳萬固) on behalf of Chuang Hua retired military, public and teaching personnel provide another example.
Furious about the reform, Wu rationalized the beating of legislators by stating that people might even kill when irritated to the point of craziness.
It is dangerous when people refuse to propose constructive comments on pension reform proposals, but rather keep stressing their own feelings and false values.
Wu’s rash actions and speech, like Hsiao’s difficulty, reflects their refusal to put themselves in others’ shoes. They are not fighting for generational justice; they are simply whining about their anxiety toward change.
As a supporter of pension reform, I do not think of pensioners as “accomplices” who have to “sacrifice” their welfare to compensate for their guilt. In criticizing the opponents, I do not consider them necessarily selfish or negligent on a personal level either.
Instead, I think that civil servants generally lack the awareness that we are not only the objects, but also the subjects of national policy. When policy no longer fits with reality, if we keep sticking to that policy and refuse to see the problems, we are either deepening social misunderstanding or marching toward self-destruction.
Chuang Yu-chuan
Yilan
The US Senate’s passage of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which urges Taiwan’s inclusion in the Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercise and allocates US$1 billion in military aid, marks yet another milestone in Washington’s growing support for Taipei. On paper, it reflects the steadiness of US commitment, but beneath this show of solidarity lies contradiction. While the US Congress builds a stable, bipartisan architecture of deterrence, US President Donald Trump repeatedly undercuts it through erratic decisions and transactional diplomacy. This dissonance not only weakens the US’ credibility abroad — it also fractures public trust within Taiwan. For decades,
In 1976, the Gang of Four was ousted. The Gang of Four was a leftist political group comprising Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members: Jiang Qing (江青), its leading figure and Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) last wife; Zhang Chunqiao (張春橋); Yao Wenyuan (姚文元); and Wang Hongwen (王洪文). The four wielded supreme power during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976), but when Mao died, they were overthrown and charged with crimes against China in what was in essence a political coup of the right against the left. The same type of thing might be happening again as the CCP has expelled nine top generals. Rather than a
Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmaker Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) on Saturday won the party’s chairperson election with 65,122 votes, or 50.15 percent of the votes, becoming the second woman in the seat and the first to have switched allegiance from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to the KMT. Cheng, running for the top KMT position for the first time, had been termed a “dark horse,” while the biggest contender was former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), considered by many to represent the party’s establishment elite. Hau also has substantial experience in government and in the KMT. Cheng joined the Wild Lily Student
Taipei stands as one of the safest capital cities the world. Taiwan has exceptionally low crime rates — lower than many European nations — and is one of Asia’s leading democracies, respected for its rule of law and commitment to human rights. It is among the few Asian countries to have given legal effect to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant of Social Economic and Cultural Rights. Yet Taiwan continues to uphold the death penalty. This year, the government has taken a number of regressive steps: Executions have resumed, proposals for harsher prison sentences
RSS