Taiwan’s economy is on a roll, growing at its fastest rate in nearly two years in the fourth quarter last year thanks to strong technology exports.
However, policymakers know that Taiwan’s substantial manufacturing sector faces increasingly stiff competition from its neighbors. These competitors can undertake product assembly and manufacture electronics components more cheaply.
To avert a growth crunch, the authorities are looking to encourage higher value-added, innovation-intensive industries. Life science industries such as biotech and pharma research and development would be key to this ambition.
Taiwanese pharmaceutical companies have experienced several years of solid growth with generic production, but it is a business of razor-thin margins. Continuing the replication of products invented, designed and manufactured elsewhere will not generate the longer-term economic value, tax revenue and attractive, high-value jobs that research and development (R&D)-intensive originator companies can. Drug innovation, not generic production, holds the key to long-term economic success.
Despite Taipei’s efforts toward developing its life sciences industry, significant investment from foreign biopharmaceutical companies remains elusive.
According to research company IHS Markit, a major roadblock is intellectual property.
In its latest assessment of Taiwan, it says: “Challenges in intellectual property rights policies persist, deterring multinational companies from investing in the sector... One major issue is that many patent-infringing drugs are being approved and included in the reimbursement list.”
A recent survey by the International Research-Based Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association found that at least 65 patent-infringing drugs have been approved for sale by Taiwanese regulators. Most were made available in the public health system.
Cheaper, generic versions of existing drugs should not, in principle, enter the market while a valid patent on the original version remains in place.
However, regulators are not currently required to notify originators when competitors seek market approval for a generic version of a patented drug. This means many generic medicines go on sale, despite potentially violating originators’ patent rights.
This widespread infringement of intellectual property rights impacts earnings by introducing price competition earlier than the patent system intends.
It also sends out a broader signal that rule of law in Taiwan is weak and that its authorities are prepared to turn a blind eye to intellectual property infringement. This not only deters R&D investment in pharmaceuticals and biotechnology, but in other sectors, too.
To bolster the environment for innovation, Taiwan is one of several nations considering a “patent linkage” system to reduce the number of generic drugs gaining marketing approval before the originators’ patent has expired.
Drafted by the Taiwan Intellectual Property Office, the plan links the patent status of a medicine and regulatory approval of generic copies to prevent approvals that infringe the original. It is currently under review by the Executive Yuan.
A patent linkage system could also boost investors’ confidence in Taiwan, particularly in the innovative life science industry. Greater investment and partnerships by these companies will encourage the creation of the higher-margin, innovation-intensive industries and the value-added jobs the government needs.
Opponents argue the move would undermine the nation’s generic drug industry, making market entry more difficult and encouraging patent holders to engage in frivolous litigation.
However, patent linkage aids generic manufacturers too. It requires innovators to keep regulators updated on the patent status of their products. Greater clarity on what is and is not patent-protected allows generic manufacturers to avoid wasting their efforts launching copied medicines that will be blocked by legal action.
While linkage mechanisms deter generic manufacturers from launching legal challenges against valid patents, Taiwan’s proposed system encourages them to contest the validity of questionable ones. As with similar schemes already implemented in South Korea and the US, generic companies are incentivized to bring validity challenges. The first successful challenger is granted a period of market exclusivity to sell their version of the drug.
Patents that should never have been granted are more likely to be revoked. In this way, patent linkage hastens the entry of price-competitive generics and ultimately discourages innovators from trying to file large numbers of low-quality applications.
Taiwan’s potential move to a patent linkage system would follow the likes of Australia, South Korea and Singapore, which suggests it is an emerging regional standard.
Ensuring the protection of intellectual property rights is fundamental for a high-income country like Taiwan as it continues its journey from a manufacturing to a knowledge economy. The new plan on patent linkage is a vital part of this journey and should be welcomed.
Jack Ellis is research associate at Geneva Network, a UK-based research organization focused on trade, health and innovative policy.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
RSS