Ever since direct elections were first held in Taiwan, there has always been a televised presidential debate. For the Jan. 16 election, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has agreed to participate in a debate on SET-TV, but the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) wants it to be broadcast by Public Television Service (PTS).
The DPP has since expressed reservations about the KMT’s alternative plan, sparking public concern that there might not be a televised debate before the election.
Given the huge impact that the first televised debate held during the Nixon-Kennedy US presidential election in 1960, televised debates have been viewed as an important way to influence the outcome of an election. If either candidate fails to adequately prepare, they will lose the opportunity to decisively change the course of events and win over the public. At the very least, presidential candidates aim to use the debate to lock in their core vote.
According to a recent poll conducted by the Taiwan Brain Trust, DPP presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) continues to lead, with a support rating of 48.2 percent, while the KMT’s Eric Chu (朱立倫) has 19.4 percent and the People First Party’s James Soong (宋楚瑜) has 11.6 percent. Short of a major incident, a DPP victory appears to be a shoo-in. Perhaps for this reason, Tsai is reluctant to debate, fearing it may hand her opponents the chance to bolster their campaigns or cause the DPP to shed votes.
Conversely, the Chu camp, lagging behind, wants to put its all into the fight, and sees the television debate as an opportunity to reverse its political fortunes. Chu’s team also hopes to be able to expose and attack what it sees as a weak spot in Tsai’s politics: cross-strait policy. It hopes this will help to remove the bad smell that has hung around the KMT ever since it ditched its original presidential candidate, the dispute around the party’s legislator-at-large list and, more recently, allegations of dodgy property transactions surrounding Chu’s running mate, Jennifer Wang (王如玄).
Needless to say, the question over which television network hosts the debate is simply a technical matter and should not prevent it from going ahead. The teams of each presidential candidate should work to remove any obstacles that remain in place, to prevent disappointing the public.
Despite its importance, a televised debate is simply one means among many that the presidential candidates have at their disposal to communicate their views and policies to the electorate. Aside from the televised information programs and election bulletins provided by the Central Election Commission, what else can candidates do to inform the public of their views?
From relatively early on, Tsai has used a succession of press conferences to convey her political views to the public. Tsai has also released a book which sets out her political beliefs. In contrast, the KMT switched candidates mid-race, which has left its campaign team little time to get the party’s message out. To date, the Chu camp has only been able to put out a handful of advertisements: The flow of information is clearly insufficient.
Given the advances in communication technology, candidates should be able to make full use of social media Web sites to increase interaction and contact with the electorate. They can also use different forms of social media to engage in effective two-way dialogue on issues and problems that concern voters. Whether through text messages or video, voters would be able to directly pose questions to the candidates, and the candidates would be able to appeal directly to voters. This would be a far more effective and penetrative method of political broadcasting than a traditional televised debate.
Instead of the candidates squabbling among themselves over who should televise the debates, would it not be better if they each went online and faced the electorate head-on?
On Tuesday, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) issued a statement criticizing Song Siyao (宋思瑤), a student from Shanghai’s Fudan University, saying she had offended the sensibilities of Taiwanese. It also called for the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation — established by former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) — which had organized the tour group, to remind group members to be careful with their statements. Song, during a visit to a baseball stadium in Taichung, said that the tour group “would like to congratulate China, Taipei team (中國台北隊) ... we wish mainland China and Taiwan compatriots can be like the team Chinatrust Brothers and
“Integrated Diplomacy” (總和外交) is the guiding principle of Taiwan’s current foreign policy. It seeks to mobilize technology, capital and talent for global outreach, strengthening Taiwan’s international connections. However, without a robust information security mechanism, such efforts risk being reduced to superficial courtesy calls. Security clearance serves as the “entrance examination results” for government agency personnel in sensitive positions, qualifying them to access sensitive information. Senior aides in the US Congress must also possess security clearance to assist lawmakers in handling classified budgets. However, security clearance is not an automatic right or a blanket necessity for accessing sensitive information. Access is granted only
Late on Tuesday evening, South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol declared martial law. A BBC analysis cited as reasons the opposition parties’ majority in the National Assembly, their continued boycott of the national budget and the impeachment of key officials and prosecutors, leading to frequent government gridlock. During the years that Taiwan and South Korea traveled the road to democratization, our countries hit many potholes. Taiwan cannot return to the Martial Law era. Despite the similarities in our authoritarian past, Yoon’s political travails are far removed from the issues Taiwan faces. Yoon’s actions are a wake-up call to the world about
Imagine that you are fully conscious, but your family, friends and healthcare workers all believe you are vegetative. You hear people discussing euthanasia, cessation of medical treatment, or moving you to a long-term care facility, none of which are able to monitor for signs of recovery. Illness is intrinsically terrifying, but nothing terrifies more than to be fully aware while those you love and those who decide your medical fate regard you as nothing more than an insentient collection of water, calcium and organic molecules. Fifteen years ago, it was discovered that more than 40 percent of patients diagnosed as
RSS