Not long ago, there were two random attacks on members of the public on the same day. I cannot help but wonder why such attacks have been happening so often lately and how they can be prevented.
Looking at the people who carried out the recent attacks, it seems that a lack of love and caring had deepened their sense of isolation and discontent with society.
Due to the development of the Internet, the number of people with dissociative personality disorders has increased and made a copycat effect more likely.
In addition, as a result of urbanization, people might be careless about others’ feelings as they come into contact with so many strangers. In such situations, a person attacking random people in the street might experience no mental resistance to doing so.
Structural economic changes have also made social mobility more difficult, with the result that an increasing number of people now feel that things are hopeless. Given this situation, random attacks might continue to occur.
In 2013, the Japanese ministry of justice released a study that showed that if Japanese society wants to prevent random attacks, the primary task would be to prevent people from being isolated.
To make this happen, the ministry proposed the following five suggestions.
First, people with a criminal record should be given appropriate treatment.
Second, employment and the labor market should be stabilized to allow all people the opportunity to give full play to their wishes and abilities.
Third, society should create an inviting environment that allows people to engage in a variety of social activities so that everyone can have a safe place to live and is given an opportunity to shine.
Fourth, mentally ill people should be given appropriate treatment and prejudice should be eliminated so that they are given a chance to heal and recover their mental health.
Fifth, people considered at high risk of committing suicide should be given preventive counseling.
While Japan’s suggestions could serve as a reference for Taiwan, these preventive measures involve systemic reform and it would not be easy to reduce the number of random attacks this way.
The criminological routine activity theory posits that there are three necessary conditions for the occurrence of most crimes: a likely offender, a suitable target and the absence of a capable guardian.
This means that strengthening the defense of possible targets and monitoring and managing public places would be helpful.
In terms of the focus of prevention, apart from strengthening the general public’s sense of crisis, the National Police Agency has proposed several measures following the recent random attacks: to further increase police visibility, enhance joint prevention mechanisms, promote rapid report and response measures, improve on-scene response, hold emergency response drills and cooperate with the concerned units to promote joint prevention work.
The most important measure that could be implemented immediately is the improvement of cooperation between management staff and security personnel at venues where attacks might occur so that suspected illegal activities could be reported and personnel could act swiftly to prevent a violent crime.
This is something to which the concerned authorities should give serious consideration.
Hsu Fu-seng is a professor in the Department of Police Administration at Central Police University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If