The four big players behind the nation’s investments, the government, private business, foreign capital and state-owed enterprises, have pulled back from putting money into Taiwan, causing local investment to sputter out. Annual investment by state-owned enterprises has dipped below NT$200 billion (US$6.4 billion) for the first time in 10 years, government-run public construction funds for next year have still not reached 10 percent of the national budget, foreign capital has drifted elsewhere and Taiwanese companies are moving overseas.
Anyone with a basic understanding of the economy knows the economic implications behind investment. The multiplier effect of investment is the primary component of GDP, and it represents the economic climate and has an impact on employment, real income levels and the future of the nation’s development. Government construction projects play a pivotal role in national infrastructure and during times of economic downturn, they can be used as an important fiscal tool at the government’s disposal to boost demand.
Public infrastructure has become more integrated and demand for construction projects has weakened. In addition, government financial indicators have reached a critical point, as borrowing is approaching its legal limit. The government’s budget is fraught with structural problems, with legal expenditures at an estimated 70 percent, pushing public works down on the list of priorities.
Areas of the government’s public works budget need review and reform. For example, maintaining an annual growth rate of a minimum 5 percent while comprising at least 10 percent of the total budget, review procedures are not comprehensive, implementation must be improved, and performance evaluations are a mere formality. There are many unused venues, criticized transportation projects and abandoned industrial parks. The government’s financial resources are overstretched, causing a decline in public construction spending. Measures such as awarding private-sector collaboration and cooperation between the central government and local governments to bring added value to several sectors require further investigation to improve effectiveness.
Build-operate-transfer projects, such as the Taipei Dome, and the high-speed rail system financial reform case have been misunderstood by the public due to ineffective communication by government departments. Contractors are hesitant, and collusion between government and industry has resulted in public distrust of the governments intentions.
Not only do people have limited knowledge of central and local governments’ cross-sector value-added policies, but at the end of last year, when the leadership of local governments changed, some policies by the National Development Council were overturned by local governments. Yunlin County and Kaohsiung want to pass their own regulations, while central and local governments are cooperating to increase value across different sectors. However, the public misunderstands the situation completely.
Investment by state-owned enterprises has shown a downturn. Such enterprises have revolving funds and apart from central government subsidies, they can raise funds or issue debt on their own. A tightened national budget usually has no effect on investments by state-owned enterprises. Many state-owned enterprises are utility companies in industries such as hydro-electricity, oil, natural gas and public transportation. The four-year public works investment plan, worth NT$500 billion, targeted at boosting the economy, and the “12 i-Taiwan projects,” initiated after the 2008 financial crisis, all had an impact on investment in state-owned enterprises.
Over the past few months, water shortages, leakage prevention and recycled water have attracted considerable attention. Water prices have not been adjusted in more than a decade, and the debt-laden Taiwan Water Corp has cut back on investment in leakage prevention and pipe replacement, as central government subsides have been reduced.
The government does not need to be so hands-on. It is impossible to rely on the government and state-owned enterprises to bear all the responsibility for infrastructure projects. However, the government is still playing the role of master planner such as in developing renewable energy sources, recycling water, and running sewage networks and sewage treatment facilities, which urgently need attention. Cooperation between the central and local governments, state-owned enterprises and private enterprises, and speeding up investment, remain issues.
Government efficiency is still the most important factor to investment. The party that has a chance of winning next year’s presidential election has a responsibility to submit rational policies. Confrontations between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party have caused serious damage to administrative efficiency and willingness to invest. Political factors that have a negative impact on investment must be reduced, while Taiwanese must demand that the nation’s politicians propose concrete, viable options for investment.
Lin Chia-cheng is a university professor and former minister of examinations.
Translated by Zane Kheir
In a summer of intense political maneuvering, Taiwanese, whose democratic vibrancy is a constant rebuke to Beijing’s authoritarianism, delivered a powerful verdict not on China, but on their own political leaders. Two high-profile recall campaigns, driven by the ruling party against its opposition, collapsed in failure. It was a clear signal that after months of bitter confrontation, the Taiwanese public is demanding a shift from perpetual campaign mode to the hard work of governing. For Washington and other world capitals, this is more than a distant political drama. The stability of Taiwan is vital, as it serves as a key player
Yesterday’s recall and referendum votes garnered mixed results for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). All seven of the KMT lawmakers up for a recall survived the vote, and by a convincing margin of, on average, 35 percent agreeing versus 65 percent disagreeing. However, the referendum sponsored by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on restarting the operation of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County failed. Despite three times more “yes” votes than “no,” voter turnout fell short of the threshold. The nation needs energy stability, especially with the complex international security situation and significant challenges regarding
Much like the first round on July 26, Saturday’s second wave of recall elections — this time targeting seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers — also failed. With all 31 KMT legislators who faced recall this summer secure in their posts, the mass recall campaign has come to an end. The outcome was unsurprising. Last month’s across-the-board defeats had already dealt a heavy blow to the morale of recall advocates and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while bolstering the confidence of the KMT and its ally the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). It seemed a foregone conclusion that recalls would falter, as
The fallout from the mass recalls and the referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant continues to monopolize the news. The general consensus is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been bloodied and found wanting, and is in need of reflection and a course correction if it is to avoid electoral defeat. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has not emerged unscathed, either, but has the opportunity of making a relatively clean break. That depends on who the party on Oct. 18 picks to replace outgoing KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). What is certain is that, with the dust settling
RSS