Independence is the future
The Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) 16th national congress on July 20 aroused a great deal of attention because of the motion that the party’s independence clause should be frozen.
“Taiwan is an independent country, so the DPP’s charter does not need to list the independence clause any more — it must be frozen,” proposal sponsor Chen Zau-nan (陳昭南) said.
The argument that Taiwan is already an independent country is questionable. If Taiwan is already an independent country, then why is there not a country named Taiwan or the Republic of Taiwan? Why does Taiwan have to carry the name of Chinese Taipei or the Republic of China (ROC)? The ROC government-in-exile claims it owns the territory of China and Mongolia; that is nonsense.
While all the media focused on DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), waiting for her to slip up, she really disappointed them. She made good judgements and decisions.
The day before the meeting, Tsai told the public that independence has been a “natural ingredient” embedded in the younger generations and could not be frozen. So, at the meeting, she spent only a few minutes putting it aside for future discussion, and the meeting carried on smoothly.
Tsai returns to the DPP’s headquarters with a great mission in mind. On the night of Jan. 14, 2012, she told her supporters that she would come back and walk together with them over the last mile to build the nation. There has been a lot of discussion about how to make her dream come true. How far is this one last mile?
On May 25, 2011, Tsai said that the ROC is a government-in-exile, which really convinced the public that she was aware of Taiwan’s status. However, later that year, during her presidential campaign, she followed the DPP charter and said: “Taiwan is the ROC and the ROC is Taiwan,” which was disappointing and called her knowledge of the San Francisco Peace Treaty into question.
I guess Taiwanese learned and grew more mature from the Sunflower movement. As Tsai said, independence has been a part of us and is well embedded in our daily lives — how can we freeze it? It is heartening to see Tsai reassure the true value of our younger generations’ beliefs.
Yes, a political leader’s awareness of Taiwan’s status is closely related to the fate of the nation. Is Taiwan part of China? If not, then why do we keep saying that Taiwan is the ROC and the ROC is Taiwan?
While we relate Taiwan to the ROC, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) will have the right to claim on Taiwan because UN Resolution 2758 officially recognizes the PRC as the sole legal government of China. The ROC’s representative was expelled from the UN and the ROC is an exiled government.
Even though no one can confirm who the sovereign of Taiwan is today, we do know for sure it is neither the ROC nor the PRC, because in 1912 when the ROC was established, Taiwan was Japan’s territory. In 1949 when the PRC kicked out the ROC and established the Chinese nation, Taiwan was technically still Japan’s territory. On Sept. 8, 1951, under the San Francisco Peace Treaty, Japan renounced the right, title and claim to Formosa and the Pescadoes, but neither the PRC nor the ROC was the recipient.
How long is Tsai’s last mile to carry out her dream? It will not be long once the realization of Taiwan’s status sets in. As of today, no legal document can prove that either the ROC or the PRC have sovereignty over Taiwan.
I hope Tsai can continue her positive progress on the recognition that Taiwan is not part of China and that independence is an inalienable clause of Taiwan. It is a natural ingredient embedded in not only the younger generations, but also all future generations.
John Hsieh
Hayward, California
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS