Independence is the future
The Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) 16th national congress on July 20 aroused a great deal of attention because of the motion that the party’s independence clause should be frozen.
“Taiwan is an independent country, so the DPP’s charter does not need to list the independence clause any more — it must be frozen,” proposal sponsor Chen Zau-nan (陳昭南) said.
The argument that Taiwan is already an independent country is questionable. If Taiwan is already an independent country, then why is there not a country named Taiwan or the Republic of Taiwan? Why does Taiwan have to carry the name of Chinese Taipei or the Republic of China (ROC)? The ROC government-in-exile claims it owns the territory of China and Mongolia; that is nonsense.
While all the media focused on DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), waiting for her to slip up, she really disappointed them. She made good judgements and decisions.
The day before the meeting, Tsai told the public that independence has been a “natural ingredient” embedded in the younger generations and could not be frozen. So, at the meeting, she spent only a few minutes putting it aside for future discussion, and the meeting carried on smoothly.
Tsai returns to the DPP’s headquarters with a great mission in mind. On the night of Jan. 14, 2012, she told her supporters that she would come back and walk together with them over the last mile to build the nation. There has been a lot of discussion about how to make her dream come true. How far is this one last mile?
On May 25, 2011, Tsai said that the ROC is a government-in-exile, which really convinced the public that she was aware of Taiwan’s status. However, later that year, during her presidential campaign, she followed the DPP charter and said: “Taiwan is the ROC and the ROC is Taiwan,” which was disappointing and called her knowledge of the San Francisco Peace Treaty into question.
I guess Taiwanese learned and grew more mature from the Sunflower movement. As Tsai said, independence has been a part of us and is well embedded in our daily lives — how can we freeze it? It is heartening to see Tsai reassure the true value of our younger generations’ beliefs.
Yes, a political leader’s awareness of Taiwan’s status is closely related to the fate of the nation. Is Taiwan part of China? If not, then why do we keep saying that Taiwan is the ROC and the ROC is Taiwan?
While we relate Taiwan to the ROC, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) will have the right to claim on Taiwan because UN Resolution 2758 officially recognizes the PRC as the sole legal government of China. The ROC’s representative was expelled from the UN and the ROC is an exiled government.
Even though no one can confirm who the sovereign of Taiwan is today, we do know for sure it is neither the ROC nor the PRC, because in 1912 when the ROC was established, Taiwan was Japan’s territory. In 1949 when the PRC kicked out the ROC and established the Chinese nation, Taiwan was technically still Japan’s territory. On Sept. 8, 1951, under the San Francisco Peace Treaty, Japan renounced the right, title and claim to Formosa and the Pescadoes, but neither the PRC nor the ROC was the recipient.
How long is Tsai’s last mile to carry out her dream? It will not be long once the realization of Taiwan’s status sets in. As of today, no legal document can prove that either the ROC or the PRC have sovereignty over Taiwan.
I hope Tsai can continue her positive progress on the recognition that Taiwan is not part of China and that independence is an inalienable clause of Taiwan. It is a natural ingredient embedded in not only the younger generations, but also all future generations.
John Hsieh
Hayward, California
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
The war between Israel and Iran offers far-reaching strategic lessons, not only for the Middle East, but also for East Asia, particularly Taiwan. As tensions rise across both regions, the behavior of global powers, especially the US under the US President Donald Trump, signals how alliances, deterrence and rapid military mobilization could shape the outcomes of future conflicts. For Taiwan, facing increasing pressure and aggression from China, these lessons are both urgent and actionable. One of the most notable features of the Israel-Iran war was the prompt and decisive intervention of the US. Although the Trump administration is often portrayed as
RSS