Swedish prisons have long had a reputation around the world for being liberal and progressive. So much so that in 2005 even former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein requested to be transferred to a Swedish prison to await his trial — a request that was rejected by the Swedish authorities. Are the country’s prisons a soft option?
The head of Sweden’s prison and probation service, Nils Oberg, announced last month that four Swedish prisons are to be closed due to an “out of the ordinary” decline in prisoner numbers.
Although there has been no fall in crime rates, between 2011 and last year there was a 6 percent drop in Sweden’s prisoner population, now just over 4,500. A similar decrease is expected for this year and the next. Oberg admitted to being puzzled by the unexpected dip, but expressed optimism that the reason had to do with how his prisons are run.
“We certainly hope that the efforts we invest in rehabilitation and preventing relapse of crime has had an impact,” he said.
“The modern prison service in Sweden is very different from when I joined as a young prison officer in 1978,” said Kenneth Gustafsson, governor of Kumla prison, Sweden’s most secure jail, situated 200km west of Stockholm. However, he does not think the system has gone soft.
“When I joined, the focus was very much on humanity in prisons. Prisoners were treated well, maybe too well, some might say. However, after a number of high-profile escapes in 2004 we had to rebalance and place more emphasis on security,” he added.
One of those escapes was made by Tony Olsen, who was serving life imprisonment for shooting dead two police officers, from a maximum security prison in collusion with a prison guard. The director general of the prison service was then forced to step down.
Despite the hardening of attitudes toward prison security following the escape scandals, the Swedes still managed to maintain a broadly humane approach to sentencing, even of the most serious offenders: Jail terms rarely exceed 10 years; those who receive life imprisonment can still apply to the courts after a decade to have the sentence commuted to a fixed term, usually in the range of 18 to 25 years. Sweden was the first country in Europe to introduce the electronic tagging of convicted criminals and continues to strive to minimize short-term prison sentences wherever possible by using community-based measures — proven to be more effective at reducing reoffending.
According to the British Ministry of Justice, the highest rate of reoffending within a year of release among adults is recorded by those serving 12 months or less. The overall reoffending rate in Sweden stands between 30 percent and 40 percent over three years — around half that in the UK. One likely factor that has kept reoffending down and the rate of incarceration in Sweden below 70 per 100,000 head of population — less than half the figure for England and Wales — is that the age of criminal responsibility is set at 15. In the UK, children aged 10 to 17 and young people under the age of 21 record the highest reoffending rates: almost three-quarters and two-thirds respectively — a good proportion of whom go on to populate adult jails. Unlike the UK, where a life sentence can be handed down to a 10-year-old, in Sweden no young person under the age of 21 can be sentenced to life and every effort is made to ensure that as few juvenile offenders as possible end up in prison.
One strong reason for the drop in prison numbers might be the amount of post-prison support available in Sweden. A confident probation service, a government agency, is tasked not only with supervising those on probation but is also guaranteed to provide treatment programs for offenders with drug, alcohol or violence issues. The service is assisted by around 4,500 lay supervisors, members of the public who volunteer to befriend and support offenders under supervision. There is no equivalent in the UK.
When I tell Gustafsson that British Secretary of State for Justice Chris Grayling recently announced that inmates in England and Wales will be forced to wear prison uniforms and have limited access to television, he laughs, explaining that “[politicians] keep their fingers away from us. We are allowed to get on with our jobs without any interference.”
He talks about broader goals and objectives for the Swedish justice department: “This year and next year the priority of our work will be with young offenders and men with convictions of violent behavior. For many years we have been running programs to help those addicted to drugs. Now we are also developing programs to address behaviors such as aggression and violence. These are the important things for our society when these people are released.”
I spoke to a former prisoner who now runs a social enterprise called X-Cons Sweden. Peter Soderlund served almost three years of a four-year sentence for drug and weapons offenses before he was released in 1998. He was helped by a newly formed organization run by former prisoners called Kris, (Criminals Return In Society). For some years he worked to help build Kris until 2008 when he left after organizational disputes and conflicts.
“The big difference between Kris and us is that we are happy to allow people who are still taking addiction medications to join us,” he said.
Both organizations work with the same goal: helping prisoners successfully reintegrate into society after they have been released. And what is life like for the prisoner in Sweden?
“When I was inside I was lucky. In Osteraker prison where I served my sentence the governor was enlightened. We were treated well. However, I knew that not all Swedish prisons were like that. I met so many people in there who needed help. After I received help from Kris I knew I wanted to help others. With X-Cons, we meet them at the gate and support them into accommodation and offer a network of support,” Soderlund said.
Could it be that the Swedish public is losing its appetite for genuine rehabilitation for prisoners? “In Sweden we believe very much in the concept of rehabilitation, without being naive of course,” Gustafsson said. “There are some people who will not or can not change. However, in my experience the majority of prisoners want to change and we must do what we can to help to facilitate that. It is not always possible to achieve this in one prison sentence.
“Also it is not just prison that can rehabilitate — it is often a combined process involving probation and greater society. We can give education and training, but when they leave prison these people need housing and jobs,” he said.
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
RSS