Swedish prisons have long had a reputation around the world for being liberal and progressive. So much so that in 2005 even former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein requested to be transferred to a Swedish prison to await his trial — a request that was rejected by the Swedish authorities. Are the country’s prisons a soft option?
The head of Sweden’s prison and probation service, Nils Oberg, announced last month that four Swedish prisons are to be closed due to an “out of the ordinary” decline in prisoner numbers.
Although there has been no fall in crime rates, between 2011 and last year there was a 6 percent drop in Sweden’s prisoner population, now just over 4,500. A similar decrease is expected for this year and the next. Oberg admitted to being puzzled by the unexpected dip, but expressed optimism that the reason had to do with how his prisons are run.
“We certainly hope that the efforts we invest in rehabilitation and preventing relapse of crime has had an impact,” he said.
“The modern prison service in Sweden is very different from when I joined as a young prison officer in 1978,” said Kenneth Gustafsson, governor of Kumla prison, Sweden’s most secure jail, situated 200km west of Stockholm. However, he does not think the system has gone soft.
“When I joined, the focus was very much on humanity in prisons. Prisoners were treated well, maybe too well, some might say. However, after a number of high-profile escapes in 2004 we had to rebalance and place more emphasis on security,” he added.
One of those escapes was made by Tony Olsen, who was serving life imprisonment for shooting dead two police officers, from a maximum security prison in collusion with a prison guard. The director general of the prison service was then forced to step down.
Despite the hardening of attitudes toward prison security following the escape scandals, the Swedes still managed to maintain a broadly humane approach to sentencing, even of the most serious offenders: Jail terms rarely exceed 10 years; those who receive life imprisonment can still apply to the courts after a decade to have the sentence commuted to a fixed term, usually in the range of 18 to 25 years. Sweden was the first country in Europe to introduce the electronic tagging of convicted criminals and continues to strive to minimize short-term prison sentences wherever possible by using community-based measures — proven to be more effective at reducing reoffending.
According to the British Ministry of Justice, the highest rate of reoffending within a year of release among adults is recorded by those serving 12 months or less. The overall reoffending rate in Sweden stands between 30 percent and 40 percent over three years — around half that in the UK. One likely factor that has kept reoffending down and the rate of incarceration in Sweden below 70 per 100,000 head of population — less than half the figure for England and Wales — is that the age of criminal responsibility is set at 15. In the UK, children aged 10 to 17 and young people under the age of 21 record the highest reoffending rates: almost three-quarters and two-thirds respectively — a good proportion of whom go on to populate adult jails. Unlike the UK, where a life sentence can be handed down to a 10-year-old, in Sweden no young person under the age of 21 can be sentenced to life and every effort is made to ensure that as few juvenile offenders as possible end up in prison.
One strong reason for the drop in prison numbers might be the amount of post-prison support available in Sweden. A confident probation service, a government agency, is tasked not only with supervising those on probation but is also guaranteed to provide treatment programs for offenders with drug, alcohol or violence issues. The service is assisted by around 4,500 lay supervisors, members of the public who volunteer to befriend and support offenders under supervision. There is no equivalent in the UK.
When I tell Gustafsson that British Secretary of State for Justice Chris Grayling recently announced that inmates in England and Wales will be forced to wear prison uniforms and have limited access to television, he laughs, explaining that “[politicians] keep their fingers away from us. We are allowed to get on with our jobs without any interference.”
He talks about broader goals and objectives for the Swedish justice department: “This year and next year the priority of our work will be with young offenders and men with convictions of violent behavior. For many years we have been running programs to help those addicted to drugs. Now we are also developing programs to address behaviors such as aggression and violence. These are the important things for our society when these people are released.”
I spoke to a former prisoner who now runs a social enterprise called X-Cons Sweden. Peter Soderlund served almost three years of a four-year sentence for drug and weapons offenses before he was released in 1998. He was helped by a newly formed organization run by former prisoners called Kris, (Criminals Return In Society). For some years he worked to help build Kris until 2008 when he left after organizational disputes and conflicts.
“The big difference between Kris and us is that we are happy to allow people who are still taking addiction medications to join us,” he said.
Both organizations work with the same goal: helping prisoners successfully reintegrate into society after they have been released. And what is life like for the prisoner in Sweden?
“When I was inside I was lucky. In Osteraker prison where I served my sentence the governor was enlightened. We were treated well. However, I knew that not all Swedish prisons were like that. I met so many people in there who needed help. After I received help from Kris I knew I wanted to help others. With X-Cons, we meet them at the gate and support them into accommodation and offer a network of support,” Soderlund said.
Could it be that the Swedish public is losing its appetite for genuine rehabilitation for prisoners? “In Sweden we believe very much in the concept of rehabilitation, without being naive of course,” Gustafsson said. “There are some people who will not or can not change. However, in my experience the majority of prisoners want to change and we must do what we can to help to facilitate that. It is not always possible to achieve this in one prison sentence.
“Also it is not just prison that can rehabilitate — it is often a combined process involving probation and greater society. We can give education and training, but when they leave prison these people need housing and jobs,” he said.
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
RSS