When Chinese textile worker Wang Mingzhi heard he could more than triple his income with a three-year stint working in Japan as an apprentice, he eagerly paid a broker US$7,300 in fees and deposit money.
From afar, Japan seemed a model of prosperity and order. Japanese government backing of the training program he would enter the country under helped ease worries about going abroad. However, when he joined the ranks of 150,000 other interns from poor Asian countries working in Japan, Wang was in for a series of shocks.
Promised a clothing factory job, the 25-year-old wound up at a huge warehouse surrounded by rice paddies where he was told to fill boxes with clothing, toys and other goods. Wang and other new arrivals were not given contracts by their Japanese boss and their monthly wages were withheld, except for overtime.
Illustration: Yusha
Anyone who did not like the conditions could return to China, their boss told them. However, then Wang would have lost most of his deposit.
How could he face his family, who were counting on sharing in the US$40,000 he hoped he would earn for three years work?
“We didn’t have any choice but to stay,” Wang said from his bunk in a cramped house he shared with a dozen others in Kaizu, a small city in central Gifu Prefecture.
Wang’s story is not unusual. Faced with a shrinking workforce and tight restrictions on immigration, Japanese employers, such as small companies, farms and fisheries, are plugging labor shortages by relying on interns from China, Vietnam and elsewhere in Asia.
FORCED LABOR
The training program is intended to help developing countries by upgrading the technical expertise of their workers, but critics say it is abused by some employers who see it as a source of cheap labor.
Employers committing violations such as failing to pay wages numbered 197 last year, down more than half from 452 in 2008, Japanese officials said.
However, lawyers and labor activists say the true number of offending firms is many times higher since interns fear being sent home if they speak up despite government attempts to prevent abuses.
In interviews, eight current and former interns talked of being cheated of wages, forced to work overtime, having contracts withheld or being charged exorbitant rents for cramped, poorly insulated housing. Some said they were prohibited from owning cellphones.
The internship system has been criticized by the UN and the US Department of State, which in its annual Trafficking in Persons Report said Japan is failing to stop cases of forced labor.
“The program is portrayed as way to transfer technology, and that Japan is doing a wonderful thing, but in reality, many are working like slaves,” said Shoichi Ibusuki, a lawyer who has represented several interns in court cases.
Some say the plight of the interns highlights the need for Japan to rethink its deep-seated resistance to immigration, out of sheer economic necessity.
A government institute projects Japan’s workforce will plummet by nearly half to 44 million over the next 50 years as the population ages and birthrates remain low. At that rate, many companies will run out of workers.
First-generation immigrants and foreign workers make up less than 2 percent of Japan’s workforce. In the US, the percentage is 14.2 percent, and in Germany the figure is 11.7 percent, according to figures from the UN.
Unions and others have called for the training program, established in 1993, to be abolished and replaced with a formal system for employment of foreign workers.
MEETING DEMAND
That will better meet the demand for low-skilled laborers as young Japanese flock to the cities and shun work that is dirty, dangerous or difficult, they say.
“We need to stop the deception,” said Ippei Torii, vice president of ZWU All United Workers Union, which has battled on behalf of interns. “If we need to bring in foreign workers, then we should call them workers and treat them so.”
Former Tokyo Immigration Bureau director Hidenori Sakanaka, who has become a champion for immigration, said Japan needs 10 million immigrants over the next 50 years or its economy will collapse.
“That’s really our only salvation,” said Sakanaka, now head of a think tank. “We should allow them to enter the country on the assumption that they could become residents of Japan.”
The chances of that happening are low. Immigration is perceived as a threat to Japan’s prized social harmony, and opponents paint scenarios of rising crime and other problems.
FATAL FLAW
About 20 years ago, Japan granted special visas to Latin Americans of Japanese descent, but many had difficulties fitting in. After the 2008 global financial crisis, they were offered money to return home.
The training program got public attention earlier this year, after a Chinese intern stabbed to death his boss and another Japanese employee at a fishery in Hiroshima, but its ongoing problems have not been front-page news.
The government strengthened laws covering the program in 2010, including prohibiting trainees from paying deposits to labor brokers. Japanese employers are expected to pay the third-party agencies. A panel of experts and officials is reviewing the program again to see if it needs further changes.
“There are some who go against the objectives of this program and use it as a source of cheap labor,” said Jun Nakamura, an immigration bureau official. “We have tried to strengthen the legal framework.”
After not receiving their regular wages for 16 months, Wang and about a dozen others at the distribution company in Gifu confronted their boss, Akiyoshi Shibata, demanding their back pay. They said he gave them a choice: return to China or drop their complaints, apologize and stay on.
Wang and three others chose to go home. A few days later, they were taken to the airport, where Shibata paid them each ￥750,000 (US$7,500), barely enough to cover the broker fee, said Gifu Ippan Labor Union official Zhen Kai, who helped in negotiations between the two sides.
In a telephone interview, Shibata said he withheld ￥50,000 every month from each trainee’s wages for the first year as a security deposit due to problems he had encountered in the past, including cases where trainees ran away. He said he paid the remaining regular wages on time and in the end paid them all they had earned.
After “all this trouble,” Shibata said he has decided against using foreign interns any more.
“I think it may be better to scrap the program since there’s a risk both sides will just be unhappy,” he said.
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
RSS