The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has three chairmen. Two of them are “honorary,” ie former chairmen, and the third has no honor at all.
At the party’s recent 19th national congress, the one without any honor at all revealed his true colors as he made a shameless grab for power amid much criticism. When one of the honorary ones took the stage, he wept and wept and wept.
The other honorary chairman was careful to stay far away from the congress and the shoes that filled the air, instead choosing to travel to the US, where he was presented with a dubious award for lifetime achievement.
When former KMT chairman Lien Chan (連戰) received the award from the US-China Policy Foundation, he received a silly award from a group of muddleheaded people, denigrating himself in the process.
Although the “honorable” Lien values awards as if they were the water of life, he should make sure that he understands what kind of organization he is accepting tribute from.
The US-China Policy Foundation is registered to Wang Chi (王冀), who is president and co-chair. Former Chinese ambassador to the US Zhou Wenzhong (周文重) is an adviser. The organization moves on the margins of China’s united front work and undertakes some of the issues that are too delicate for the Chinese embassy to deal with.
Wang’s Chinese-language resume boasts that he has received former Chinese paramount leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) and former Chinese presidents Jiang Zemin (江澤民) and Hu Jintao (胡錦濤), as well as former Chinese premiers Zhu Rongji (朱鎔基) and Wen Jiabao (溫家寶), assisted the US and China in the setting up of liaison offices and organized Soong Mayling’s (宋美齡) — Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) wife — address to the US Congress (February 1943).
The resume also states that Lien “asked me to pave the way for his visit to China, and I was happy to agree to contact the person in charge of China’s Taiwan Affairs Office and facilitate Lien Chan’s visit to China.”
Lien has been played by a man who likes to exaggerate, and he even thinks that a great honor has been bestowed on him. However, Lien’s office only issued a statement containing the address he delivered at the award ceremony, boasting about the partnership between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party and his ice-breaking visit to China, during which he sold Taiwan down the river.
The statement said nothing about who had presented the award or which prominent figures that attended the ceremony, making it pretty clear that these are not things to be proud of.
Whether as foreign minister, premier or vice president, the “honorable” Lien has moved from anti-communism to siding up with the communists, resembling, to a certain extent, former ROC vice president and acting president Lee Tsung-jen (李宗仁), who attempted to negotiate with the communists during the end of the Chinese Civil War. Still, that he would have to rely on such a small foundation concocting such a thing as a “lifetime achievement award” as a pretext for endorsing his achievements implies a lot of muddleheadedness.
And that is not all. Drawing some conclusions based on the foundation’s services and members, it seems pretty clear that it is relying on China for financial support.
Lien does not understand the importance of such matters, and he belittled himself by accepting the award. He even said that his trip to China to sell out Taiwan was a result of Hu’s determination, and that Hu also should have received an award.
Rarely do we see such confusion and muddleheadedness.
James Wang is a political commentator.
Translated by Perry Svensson
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
An American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) spokesperson on Saturday rebuked a Chinese official for mischaracterizing World War II-era agreements as proving that Taiwan was ceded to China. The US Department of State later affirmed that the AIT remarks reflect Washington’s long-standing position: Taiwan’s political status remains undetermined and should only be resolved peacefully. The US would continue supporting Taiwan against military, economic, legal and diplomatic pressure from China, and opposes any unilateral attempt to alter the “status quo,” particularly through coercion or force, the United Daily News cited the department as saying. The remarks followed Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs