Chinese activist Chen Guangcheng (陳光誠) headed back to the US on Thursday at the end of an 18-day visit that served to highlight the disconnect between what Taiwan’s government says it represents and the actions of its officials.
On the first day of his visit, Chen advised Taiwanese to stand firm on the nation’s democracy, noting that its existence gave the lie to Beijing’s assertion that democracy is not suited to the Chinese world. Vowing to return to China one day, he said his persecution by Chinese authorities was the result of having “struck Beijing on its Achilles’ heel.”
However, the reaction of government leaders in Taipei to Chen’s visit showed that democratic activism has also become an Achilles’ heel for officialdom in Taiwan, a trait that has become increasingly clear in recent years each time there is public resistance to questionable development schemes and construction projects that severely damage the environment.
While Chen’s trip was intensely covered by the local media, top officials, including President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平), reacted as if he were a carrier of bubonic plague instead of a promoter of the rule of law and democratic rights.
What made Wang’s reluctance to meet with Chen even sadder than Ma’s — due to Wang’s “unpredictable” schedule and Chen’s “settled” itinerary — was that Wang is president of the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy. The government-funded institution was established to support people and groups that promote democracy and human rights. Perhaps Wang failed to read the part of the foundation’s mission statement that says it is “committed to the vision of working together with like-minded organizations and individuals … to advance a new wave of democratization worldwide.”
Maybe for Wang, who obviously does not want to rock the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) boat over China, Chen is not “like-minded” enough. Ma’s unwillingness to meet with Chen was just another example of his aversion to people who remind him that he should behave as the president of a nation that is not run by Beijing. While some analysts credit Ma for allowing Chen to visit Taiwan in the first place, given the refusal to issue visas to the Dalai Lama, Uighur rights activist Rebiya Kadeer and others on Beijing’s enemy list, it is little sop for the lack of spine he shows in refusing to stand tall before Beijing’s rulers.
However, Chen did not make life comfortable for the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) either, saying after a meeting with DPP Chairman Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) that “the concept of independence has become out of date in Taiwan.”
Nevertheless, his views did not deter DPP lawmakers and members from meeting him. Many have had more experience than their KMT counterparts of repression, torture and false imprisonment, and are able to overlook nationalistic differences in pursuit of common goals.
Perhaps they recognized his need to deprive Beijing of any “pro-independence” ammunition to use against him or, even more crucially, his relatives, who are being targeted by Chinese authorities.
Or perhaps they agreed with him when he said the future of cross-strait development should be decided by the people and based on human rights.
Chen said he was revitalized by meeting Taiwanese democracy advocates who had sacrificed their freedom in the nation’s democratization process and he was impressed by the passion of the Taiwanese.
Hopefully, these activists have been equally revitalized to show that the KMT administration does not represent their true interests.
Both Chen and the Taiwanese will need energy and passion to continue their battle against Beijing’s repression of human rights, be it in China, in Taiwan or elsewhere.
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
Last month, two major diplomatic events unfolded in Southeast Asia that suggested subtle shifts in the region’s strategic landscape. The 46th ASEAN Summit and the inaugural ASEAN-Gulf-Cooperation Council (GCC)-China Trilateral Summit in Kuala Lumpur coincided with French President Emmanuel Macron’s high-profile visits to Vietnam, Indonesia and Singapore. Together, they highlighted ASEAN’s maturing global posture, deepening regional integration and China’s intensifying efforts to recalibrate its economic diplomacy amid uncertainties posed by the US. The ASEAN summit took place amid rising protectionist policies from the US, notably sweeping tariffs on goods from Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, with duties as high as 49 percent.
RSS