President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has challenged Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) to a debate, but is there really any need to debate whether the government’s policies are pro-Chinese? The way the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) forced through the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) without paying any attention to public opinion is clear proof of the party’s pro-China stance.
Beijing made it clear long ago that using economic means to spur unification and using business to force political talks is a core component of the Chinese Communist Party’s Taiwan policy. The Ma government rushed to sign the agreement and has kept on insisting that it has nothing to do with politics or sovereignty. However, the ECFA does have political premises and poses a huge threat to Taiwan’s existence.
To make matters worse, Taiwan’s economy has been deeply affected by the ECFA. Here are a few random examples.
First is the stock market crisis. On Sept. 27, the TAIEX -plummeted 169 points, falling below the psychological 7,000 mark to its lowest level in two years. The government blamed the crisis on international factors, but does not explain why the TAIEX has dropped more than markets in other nations. Since the ECFA was signed more than a year ago, the TAIEX has dropped more than other Asian stock markets, making it clear that the ECFA was mostly to blame for the recent crisis.
Second is the salary crisis. Taiwan employs 6.64 million people and 60 percent of these are blue-collar workers. The month the ECFA was signed, the average monthly salary was NT$33,957 (US$1,115), but a year later this had dropped to NT$33,772. Compared with the average salary of NT$35,049 in 2000, it has dropped NT$1, 277, or 3.6 percent. This is exactly what happened in Hong Kong after it signed the Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement with China, which sent the average salary from HK$27,708 (US$3,559) down to HK$24,244. There are now 114,000 Taiwanese households living below the poverty line, and it seems salaries in the ECFA age will continue to plummet.
Third is the housing crisis. Housing is a basic human right, but it has become very hard to find suitable housing in Taipei because of worsening speculation. Last quarter, the average price per ping (3.3m2) was NT$570,000, an increase of 13 percent for the quarter, with the total cost for an apartment averaging NT$27.87 million, which means that people would have stop eating and drinking for 16 years before they could buy a home. The average person would never have a chance to own their own home.
Fourth is the large drop in the export growth rate. As of August, exports to China grew by 7.9 percent, 1.96 percentage points lower than the growth rate of 9.86 percent that was experienced from January to June. However, for the same month, South Korea experienced a growth rate of 21.2 percent. In terms of export growth to the rest of the world, from January to August, Taiwan’s exports grew by 15.7 percent, well behind South Korea’s 24.6 percent and Singapore’s 21.1 percent growth rates.
Fifth is the outflow of business and industry. As more companies move to China in search of the first opportunities of the ECFA, instances of investments of NT$480 billion and NT$180 billion have gone to China. Such numbers are astonishing. This has caused a serious shortage of domestic Taiwanese investment and foreign investment has also stopped as a result. Economic momentum is dropping off day by day.
There may be little for Taiwanese to like about the ECFA, but the government is still in love with it. If it didn’t lean toward China, it would have never thought the ECFA was a good idea.
Huang Tien-lin is a former national policy adviser to the president.
Translated By Drew Cameron
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then