President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has challenged Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) to a debate, but is there really any need to debate whether the government’s policies are pro-Chinese? The way the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) forced through the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) without paying any attention to public opinion is clear proof of the party’s pro-China stance.
Beijing made it clear long ago that using economic means to spur unification and using business to force political talks is a core component of the Chinese Communist Party’s Taiwan policy. The Ma government rushed to sign the agreement and has kept on insisting that it has nothing to do with politics or sovereignty. However, the ECFA does have political premises and poses a huge threat to Taiwan’s existence.
To make matters worse, Taiwan’s economy has been deeply affected by the ECFA. Here are a few random examples.
First is the stock market crisis. On Sept. 27, the TAIEX -plummeted 169 points, falling below the psychological 7,000 mark to its lowest level in two years. The government blamed the crisis on international factors, but does not explain why the TAIEX has dropped more than markets in other nations. Since the ECFA was signed more than a year ago, the TAIEX has dropped more than other Asian stock markets, making it clear that the ECFA was mostly to blame for the recent crisis.
Second is the salary crisis. Taiwan employs 6.64 million people and 60 percent of these are blue-collar workers. The month the ECFA was signed, the average monthly salary was NT$33,957 (US$1,115), but a year later this had dropped to NT$33,772. Compared with the average salary of NT$35,049 in 2000, it has dropped NT$1, 277, or 3.6 percent. This is exactly what happened in Hong Kong after it signed the Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement with China, which sent the average salary from HK$27,708 (US$3,559) down to HK$24,244. There are now 114,000 Taiwanese households living below the poverty line, and it seems salaries in the ECFA age will continue to plummet.
Third is the housing crisis. Housing is a basic human right, but it has become very hard to find suitable housing in Taipei because of worsening speculation. Last quarter, the average price per ping (3.3m2) was NT$570,000, an increase of 13 percent for the quarter, with the total cost for an apartment averaging NT$27.87 million, which means that people would have stop eating and drinking for 16 years before they could buy a home. The average person would never have a chance to own their own home.
Fourth is the large drop in the export growth rate. As of August, exports to China grew by 7.9 percent, 1.96 percentage points lower than the growth rate of 9.86 percent that was experienced from January to June. However, for the same month, South Korea experienced a growth rate of 21.2 percent. In terms of export growth to the rest of the world, from January to August, Taiwan’s exports grew by 15.7 percent, well behind South Korea’s 24.6 percent and Singapore’s 21.1 percent growth rates.
Fifth is the outflow of business and industry. As more companies move to China in search of the first opportunities of the ECFA, instances of investments of NT$480 billion and NT$180 billion have gone to China. Such numbers are astonishing. This has caused a serious shortage of domestic Taiwanese investment and foreign investment has also stopped as a result. Economic momentum is dropping off day by day.
There may be little for Taiwanese to like about the ECFA, but the government is still in love with it. If it didn’t lean toward China, it would have never thought the ECFA was a good idea.
Huang Tien-lin is a former national policy adviser to the president.
Translated By Drew Cameron
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS