Former vice president Lien Chan (連戰) may go down in history as the first — and last — “winner” of the Confucius Peace Prize, after the Chinese Ministry of Culture reportedly ordered that this year’s award ceremony should be scrapped.
Or maybe not.
The news out of Beijing about the prize, and who organizes it, is just as mixed up and farcical as it was last year, when a group of academics and other “Chinese patriots” announced the award and then went on to present it just one day before the Nobel committee in Norway awarded the Nobel Peace Prize to jailed Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波).
The Confucius prize had first been suggested in an opinion piece in the Global Times, owned by Chinese Communist Party mouthpiece the People’s Daily, shortly after the award to Liu had been announced to much gnashing of teeth and howls of protest in Beijing. The apparatchiks condemned the award to Liu as a Western plot against China that had hurt the feelings of the Chinese people. Lo and behold, just three weeks later, a group headed by “Confucius Peace Prize jury chairman” Tan Changliu (譚長流) announced that Lien had won the inaugural Confucius award for his contribution to the development of cross-strait relations and world peace.
At the time, Tan said his organization was a private group with no links to the Chinese government and that they had been preparing for years to create an award to promote world peace from an “Eastern” perspective. Most people had a hard time believing him.
At the award ceremony in Beijing, which was even more chaotic than the initial press conference, Lien was a no-show and a little girl was hauled up before the cameras to accept the stack of cash that was supposed to be the US$15,000 prize. A brochure handed out at the ceremony declared that given its huge population, China should have more of a say about world peace than tiny Norway.
Undeterred by last year’s mess, earlier this month the China Native Art Association’s Culture Protection Bureau announced its list of candidates for this year’s Confucius prize: the Beijing-appointed Panchen Lama (as opposed to the one recognized by the Dalai Lama), Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, South African President Jacob Zuma and 81-year-old Chinese agricultural scientist Yuan Longping (袁龍萍), who first developed hybrid rice species in the 1970s.
The clear winner on that list would appear to be Yuan, whose contribution to crop productivity helped reduce famine in many areas and thereby contributed to world peace as much as Kenya’s environmental campaigner and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Wangari Maathai did with her tree-planting and campaigns to empower rural women. Given the choice of Lien, however, the jury would probably go for Putin.
This week, the art association announced in a message on the culture ministry Web site that the bureau had been disbanded and the second Confucius award was canceled. The ministry said the bureau had not received permission to promote the event and again disavowed any connection to the prize.
Yet that same day the award’s chairman said there would still be an award ceremony in December and that other organizations were competing to sponsor the prize.
Perhaps it was all the embarrassing headlines surrounding last year’s debacle — not good considering Beijing’s push to get its Confucius Institutes into more countries and universities. Or perhaps the Beijing mandarins don’t want another reminder of how far they have strayed from Confucius’ own teachings that stressed the need for moral rulers, leading by example and judicial equality.
Given his belief that an “oppressive government is fiercer and more feared than a tiger,” Confucius might have found himself sharing a jail cell with Liu instead of dining with the elite at Zhongnanhai.
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which