As a young girl growing up in Wenzhou, southern China’s “capital of capitalism,” Sui He (何穗) had a dream: to become a self-made businesswoman.
At 21, she is approaching the top, living in New York and flying around the world. However, instead of becoming a hard-nosed entrepreneur, she is rising through the ranks of an equally cut-throat industry — as one of a new breed of Chinese models strolling the catwalks of London, Milan and New York.
“Editorial look and natural poise all the way,” gushed one fashion blogger; “a delicate air that shifts to hard edge in a blink,” raved another.
Designers are equally enthusiastic: He became the first Asian model ever to open for Ralph Lauren, the high priest of WASP style, at New York fashion week.
However, He points out that she is not alone
“They had six Chinese models in the show — it was just by accident that I was the one who opened it,” she said.
December’s US Vogue featured eight east Asian models — Chinese, South Korean and Japanese — in an “Asia Major” shoot. Liu Wen (劉雯) was the first Asian model to appear in a Victoria’s Secret show and became Estee Lauder’s first Asian “spokesmodel” last year; Maybelline has hired another Chinese model, Shu Pei (秦舒裴). Feifei Sun (孫菲菲), Emma Pei (裴蓓) and Ming Xi (奚夢瑤) have all walked for top designers. Lest the boys feel left out, Louis Vuitton recently hired Taiwanese-Canadian Godfrey Gao (高以翔) for a moody advertising campaign.
“In the last couple of seasons you have seen a sudden increase,” said Angelica Cheung (張宇), editor of Vogue China. “Even in the last two or three years it was pretty much about Du Juan (杜鵑): She was the only one going big. Now they have all appeared.”
Sui confesses that when she was growing up she thought of models as “flower vases” — a Chinese idiom indicating beauty but emptiness. Yet these days others are making bold claims for the significance of these new faces; the US Vogue spread announced that the models were “redefining traditional concepts of beauty” (traditional, that is, in the West).
Liu has declared of her compatriots: “We are making history every day.”
A handful of models of Asian origin have been celebrated in the West before, such as Tina Chow. More recently, Du became the first Asian model on the cover of French Vogue and has walked for Valentino and Yves Saint Laurent.
Yet New York magazine described Sui He’s Ralph Lauren appearance as “the most surprising casting of the season,” saying more about the persistent whiteness of the fashion industry than about its new-found diversity.
Cheung is proud to say that Vogue China played a part in the rise of Chinese models by flying in big-name international photographers for fashion spreads.
“We pretty much launched [Du Juan’s] career by having Patrick Demarchelier shoot her,” she said.
She concedes there is another reason why Chinese models are in fashion: money.
“Because of the economic problems elsewhere, China became the only shining spot. As a consumer market it has grown and grown,” she said.
Consultancy firm Bain & Co reported recently that China would this year become the world’s second-largest luxury-goods market, with 25 percent growth taking it to US$17 billion in sales. McKinsey predicts that by 2015 it will be worth US$27 billion.
Louis Vuitton’s decision to hire Gao was not only testament to his razor-like cheekbones, but to the increasing clout of Chinese luxury consumers, more than half of whom are male. Similarly, Estee Lauder’s decision to hire Liu is less surprising given China’s multibillion-dollar skincare and cosmetics industry. This gives some encouragement to those who hope east Asian models will continue to be used, despite the industry’s history of showing a fleeting interest in, say, larger models or black women.
In 2008, Vogue Italia ran an issue using only black models, amid a bout of fashion industry introspection about its woeful lack of diversity. Yet this February, jezebel.com — which has tallied the model count at shows for several years — reported the whitest New York fashion week since 2008.
Blogger Jenny Zhang, who has written about fashion’s representations of east Asian women, said: “I don’t think this is just a fad because Asia is such a big luxury market. It doesn’t seem to be a cultural shift, but a market shift — and maybe a cultural shift will come from that.”
Dodai Stewart of jezebel.com, who has written about the lack of diversity among models, does not expect to see an Asian model on the cover of Vogue’s all-powerful US edition any time soon.
“I would love to and I think people would buy it — but I have low expectations,” she said.
“It’s not that the increasing visibility of Asian models doesn’t matter; it’s just that it doesn’t matter enough,” added Minh-Ha T Pham, associate professor at Illinois University, Urbana-Champaign, and one of the self-proclaimed “clotheshorse academics” behind the Threadbared blog exploring the politics of fashion.
The lion’s share of jobs still go to white models, she said.
“In celebrating a few exceptional editorials, I think we can become complacent to the racial and economic asymmetries that organize the fashion industry at large,” she said.
Many wonder if Asian models are really being celebrated for their individuality — or used to represent an Orientalized “other.” The much-hyped Vogue shoot styled all the models in matching Mohawk-type hairstyles — not, in itself, a stereotypically Asian look, but one which made it harder to distinguish between their very different looks.
Whether or not Sui He and her compatriots appear in catwalk shows and glossy magazines is one question. How they appear, it seems, is quite another.
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India