Life after Kyoto
As the expiration date for the Kyoto Protocol looms ever closer, environmentalists like George Monbiot will predictably pin much of the blame for the failure of Kyoto on the Chinese government.
They will find themselves in the position of arguing for more regulatory oversight to be imposed on businesses by one of the world’s most desperate, least trustworthy and most abusive governments.
Moreover, in the event of further natural disasters over the next decade, it is quite likely that the government in Beijing and its subordinate parochial departments may struggle to cope, and the resulting human and environmental costs will be staggering.
Perhaps, however, an alternative frame of mind may afford an opportunity for environmentalists along with human rights advocates and entrepreneurs.
The commercial development of clean, efficient and independent energy and water technologies is a relatively high-tech affair, but one which entrepreneurs in Taiwan, with their wealth of high-end research, development and engineering expertise, could be well placed to successfully exploit and eventually introduce to Chinese consumers and businesses located in China.
Worthy of particular attention are nanoscale water filters which eradicate all known viruses and bacteria by filtering water at the molecular level, and radioisotope batteries, which generate electricity from the temperature differential across a magnetic field caused by radiation from small and easily shielded quantities of plutonium 238.
Both of these technologies offer the possibility of sustainable, portable, cheap and network-independent supply and re-supply of both clean water and electricity.
There are, however, several institutional barriers to entry into this potential market.
The domestic market demand for both water and energy in Taiwan is distorted by a combination of monopoly supply, farming and manufacturing subsidies and, most notably, the inclusion of private externalities on the list of public liabilities.
Were a courageous set of politicians to attempt to reform this list so that manufacturers, farmers and domestic consumers had to deal with real prices, then the demand for clean, efficient and independent water and energy technologies would improve significantly.
Even without such political retreat, it is likely that market demand for these technologies will improve over time as more money is wasted on environmentally destructive dams and centrally networked renewable energy sources that deliver energy on only the slightest of margins.
The commercial development of such technologies in Taiwan and their appropriately scaled introduction in China would not only be a boon for Taiwanese business, Taiwanese consumers and the environment in Taiwan, but also for Chinese businesses, Chinese consumers and China’s environment.
Not only that, but flourishing Taiwanese enterprises in this field would enable people in both Taiwan and China to recover more easily from natural disasters when demand for energy and clean water hit instant peaks.
These technologies would also undermine a not-insignificant arm of serial human-rights abuser, the People’s Republic of China
MICHAEL FAGAN
Tainan
Father’s Day, as celebrated around the world, has its roots in the early 20th century US. In 1910, the state of Washington marked the world’s first official Father’s Day. Later, in 1972, then-US president Richard Nixon signed a proclamation establishing the third Sunday of June as a national holiday honoring fathers. Many countries have since followed suit, adopting the same date. In Taiwan, the celebration takes a different form — both in timing and meaning. Taiwan’s Father’s Day falls on Aug. 8, a date chosen not for historical events, but for the beauty of language. In Mandarin, “eight eight” is pronounced
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
In a recent essay, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” a former adviser to US President Donald Trump, Christian Whiton, accuses Taiwan of diplomatic incompetence — claiming Taipei failed to reach out to Trump, botched trade negotiations and mishandled its defense posture. Whiton’s narrative overlooks a fundamental truth: Taiwan was never in a position to “win” Trump’s favor in the first place. The playing field was asymmetrical from the outset, dominated by a transactional US president on one side and the looming threat of Chinese coercion on the other. From the outset of his second term, which began in January, Trump reaffirmed his
Despite calls to the contrary from their respective powerful neighbors, Taiwan and Somaliland continue to expand their relationship, endowing it with important new prospects. Fitting into this bigger picture is the historic Coast Guard Cooperation Agreement signed last month. The common goal is to move the already strong bilateral relationship toward operational cooperation, with significant and tangible mutual benefits to be observed. Essentially, the new agreement commits the parties to a course of conduct that is expressed in three fundamental activities: cooperation, intelligence sharing and technology transfer. This reflects the desire — shared by both nations — to achieve strategic results within
RSS