In 1980, conservationists in Taiwan launched a movement to save the mangrove swamp at Zhuwei (竹圍) on the bank of the Tamsui River in Taipei County. The campaign was sparked by Taiwan Provincial Land Development Corp’s plan to drain about 60 hectares of mangrove swamp to build 8,000 units of public housing.
This project threw botanists and environmentalists into a panic. The three national TV stations took up the issue with daily reports. Many academics, myself included, wrote articles denouncing the plan. Thanks to the efforts of many people, the project was called off and the mangroves were saved.
When the Tamsui Line of Taipei’s Mass Rapid Transport system was built, Hongshulin Station was included to allow people of all ages to visit what is now a mangrove nature reserve, a rich ecosystem that provides shelter for egrets and many migratory and protected bird species. This oasis has become one of Taiwan’s top spots for environmental and ecological education and research, and a major attraction for ecotourism. How could 8,000 apartments compare to such a priceless treasure?
The wetlands on the west coast of Changhua County are much larger than Zhuwei, measuring several thousand hectares. They provide an ideal habitat for the Chinese white dolphin (Sousa chinensis), also called the Indo-Pacific humpback dolphin. They are also a paradise for seafood production and are Taiwan’s main source of clams and oysters.
If, as now proposed, this wetland is developed into a heavy industrial zone, farmers and fishermen will be driven out, and Taiwanese will find it hard to get unpolluted seafood. If the proposed eighth naphtha cracker is built, it will emit pollution and cause water shortages, harming agricultural production in Yunlin and Changhua counties. Another naphtha cracker would bring benefits only to big business, not the general public.
Additionally, the cracker complex, once completed, would generate a quarter of all the nation’s carbon-dioxide emissions. How does this fit with President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) policy of cutting energy consumption and carbon dioxide output?
Wetlands have provided a habitat and livelihood for mankind since ancient times. Among all terrestrial and marine ecosystems, wetlands have the highest net primary productivity — the conversion of carbon dioxide into organic compounds — at about 9,000 kilocalories per square meter per year, more than three times the figure for farmland and forest.
Wetlands have a dozen or more useful functions. They regulate water currents, absorb and store carbon dioxide, protect the coastline, store nutrients washed down from upstream, conserve alluvial soil, filter water and remove pollutants, nurture aquatic resources, preserve a diverse gene pool and provide a protective environment for wild animals. They also enrich natural scenery, foster leisure and tourism and regulate surrounding ecosystems.
For all these reasons, wetlands are protected internationally by the 1971 Convention on Wetlands, more commonly know as the Ramsar Convention.
When wetlands are lost, so is biodiversity and aquaculture will decline and perish. Our leaders should not just mouth slogans about cutting energy consumption and carbon-dioxide emissions while giving the green light to industries that pump out greenhouse gasses.
How can the public accept such perversity? I call on policymakers to think carefully about this issue and step back from the brink. It is their duty to choose the path of sustainable development for Taiwan and all mankind.
Chou Chang-hung is an academician at Academia Sinica.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
RSS