What’s behind PRC aid?
The human and economic toll of the Jan. 12 earthquake off the coast of Haiti highlights the institutional weakness of many poor countries when faced with natural disasters.
With difficulty providing basic services before the earthquake and the destruction of many aid centers (including the UN mission headquarters), the need for immediate foreign assistance is undeniable. While the international response has been remarkable — mirroring that of the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake — another factor may have gone largely unnoticed: China’s offer of assistance.
Chinese offers of post-disaster assistance have become more commonplace in the past decade; however the Haitian case is anomalous in that the Caribbean country is one of the 23 countries with diplomatic relations with Taipei rather than Beijing. Although Chinese assistance has on occasion been granted to non-recognizing countries (such as sending peacekeepers to Haiti in 2004), this usually has been part of “dollar diplomacy” to encourage a switch of diplomatic recognition.
Haiti has been one of Taiwan’s strongest allies since it established relations in 1956, in no small part because Taiwan has been the island’s largest single donor in recent years. Current conditions, however, present an opportunity to tie much needed aid to cutting relations with Taiwan. While one should applaud China rising as a responsible global power, the potential political incentives behind these actions should not be ignored.
TIMOTHY RICH
Bloomington, Indiana
Look in the mirror, Mr Ma
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said recently that “former Democratic Progressive Party legislator [and candidate] Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) is not a Hualien person, only a passerby, and does not have feelings for Hualien.”
Ma was not very careful in choosing his words to criticize the candidate of the opposition party. He should have realized that the manner in which he criticized Hsiao essentially represented a criticism of himself and his party.
Ma’s criticism could easily be substituted with “President Ma is not a Taiwanese, only a passerby, and does not have feelings for Taiwan,” and “the Chinese Nationalist Party is not a local party, only a Chinese party, and does not have feelings for Taiwan.”
Taiwanese are the best judges as to whether these statements are true or false.
CHARLES HONG
Columbus, Ohio
Father’s Day, as celebrated around the world, has its roots in the early 20th century US. In 1910, the state of Washington marked the world’s first official Father’s Day. Later, in 1972, then-US president Richard Nixon signed a proclamation establishing the third Sunday of June as a national holiday honoring fathers. Many countries have since followed suit, adopting the same date. In Taiwan, the celebration takes a different form — both in timing and meaning. Taiwan’s Father’s Day falls on Aug. 8, a date chosen not for historical events, but for the beauty of language. In Mandarin, “eight eight” is pronounced
In a recent essay, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” a former adviser to US President Donald Trump, Christian Whiton, accuses Taiwan of diplomatic incompetence — claiming Taipei failed to reach out to Trump, botched trade negotiations and mishandled its defense posture. Whiton’s narrative overlooks a fundamental truth: Taiwan was never in a position to “win” Trump’s favor in the first place. The playing field was asymmetrical from the outset, dominated by a transactional US president on one side and the looming threat of Chinese coercion on the other. From the outset of his second term, which began in January, Trump reaffirmed his
Despite calls to the contrary from their respective powerful neighbors, Taiwan and Somaliland continue to expand their relationship, endowing it with important new prospects. Fitting into this bigger picture is the historic Coast Guard Cooperation Agreement signed last month. The common goal is to move the already strong bilateral relationship toward operational cooperation, with significant and tangible mutual benefits to be observed. Essentially, the new agreement commits the parties to a course of conduct that is expressed in three fundamental activities: cooperation, intelligence sharing and technology transfer. This reflects the desire — shared by both nations — to achieve strategic results within
It is difficult not to agree with a few points stated by Christian Whiton in his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” and yet the main idea is flawed. I am a Polish journalist who considers Taiwan her second home. I am conservative, and I might disagree with some social changes being promoted in Taiwan right now, especially the push for progressiveness backed by leftists from the West — we need to clean up our mess before blaming the Taiwanese. However, I would never think that those issues should dominate the West’s judgement of Taiwan’s geopolitical importance. The question is not whether
RSS