J. on Joe
Dear Johnny,
Normally I quite enjoy reading your column, since you try to be more or less neutral and are not afraid to attack stupidity in both camps (green and blue). So I was slightly disappointed to read your column about the appointment of Joe Hung (洪健昭) as chief of the Central News Agency (“Cuff him, Danno ... oh ... use mine,” Dec. 12, page 8).
I do not like the deep blue thinking in some of Mr Hung’s articles, but your criticism of the political dimension of this appointment amounts to a double standard. Mr Hung’s predecessor was Mr Su Tseng-ping (蘇正平), well known for his affilation to the green camp and even Government Information Office chief under former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) before that.
I don’t remember you criticizing Su’s appointment. So come on, Johnny — you can do better and your readers are not that stupid.
J. Mueller
Taipei
Johnny replies: Thanks for writing, J. My concern with Hung is his personal reactionary politics, not the reactionary politics that got him the job. Political appointments are par for the course, but despite this, media standards and freedoms should be defended. I fear CNA will regress even further.
A Nobel sense of humor
Dear Johnny,
I was reading an Oct. 12 article called “Nobel: Ma Overlooked” by Raoul Heinrichs in The Interpreter, the blog for the Lowy Institute for International Policy.
It says: “Like many people, I tend to think that the decision to pre-emptively award [US] President [Barack] Obama the Nobel Peace prize was a very poor one. ...
“But if not Obama, then whom? To my mind, perhaps the most worthy candidate would have been Ma Ying-jeou [馬英九], president of Taiwan. Since his election in March 2008, Ma has provided the impetus for the most rapid and wide-ranging rapprochement in cross-Strait relations in sixty years.
“Even as Taiwan’s economic growth came to a grinding halt — it grew at 0.1% for most of 2008 — Ma has sustained broad public support for his approach to relations with the mainland, securing Beijing’s tentative cooperation by deferring questions of independence and reunification, and facilitating agreements on, among other things, the establishment of direct charter flights, a diplomatic truce, and new bilateral investment guidelines — all the while conducting his diplomacy in a manner generally conducive to further improvement in relations.”
The bit that I find a bit dodgy is when the article states “Ma has sustained broad public support for his relations with the mainland.” Uggh ... excuse me ... “broad public support”?
So, Johnny, what are your impressions?
Michael Scanlon
East Hartford, Connecticut
Johnny replies: The opinion that Ma deserves a Nobel is not new, but this is the first time I’ve seen it come from a reputable think tank. My humble advice to Mr Heinrichs:
1. Come to Taiwan.
2. Count how many Taiwanese hear this suggestion before someone laughs in your face.
Father’s Day, as celebrated around the world, has its roots in the early 20th century US. In 1910, the state of Washington marked the world’s first official Father’s Day. Later, in 1972, then-US president Richard Nixon signed a proclamation establishing the third Sunday of June as a national holiday honoring fathers. Many countries have since followed suit, adopting the same date. In Taiwan, the celebration takes a different form — both in timing and meaning. Taiwan’s Father’s Day falls on Aug. 8, a date chosen not for historical events, but for the beauty of language. In Mandarin, “eight eight” is pronounced
In a recent essay, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” a former adviser to US President Donald Trump, Christian Whiton, accuses Taiwan of diplomatic incompetence — claiming Taipei failed to reach out to Trump, botched trade negotiations and mishandled its defense posture. Whiton’s narrative overlooks a fundamental truth: Taiwan was never in a position to “win” Trump’s favor in the first place. The playing field was asymmetrical from the outset, dominated by a transactional US president on one side and the looming threat of Chinese coercion on the other. From the outset of his second term, which began in January, Trump reaffirmed his
Despite calls to the contrary from their respective powerful neighbors, Taiwan and Somaliland continue to expand their relationship, endowing it with important new prospects. Fitting into this bigger picture is the historic Coast Guard Cooperation Agreement signed last month. The common goal is to move the already strong bilateral relationship toward operational cooperation, with significant and tangible mutual benefits to be observed. Essentially, the new agreement commits the parties to a course of conduct that is expressed in three fundamental activities: cooperation, intelligence sharing and technology transfer. This reflects the desire — shared by both nations — to achieve strategic results within
It is difficult not to agree with a few points stated by Christian Whiton in his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” and yet the main idea is flawed. I am a Polish journalist who considers Taiwan her second home. I am conservative, and I might disagree with some social changes being promoted in Taiwan right now, especially the push for progressiveness backed by leftists from the West — we need to clean up our mess before blaming the Taiwanese. However, I would never think that those issues should dominate the West’s judgement of Taiwan’s geopolitical importance. The question is not whether