The Council for Economic Planning and Development (CEPD) last week said economic indicators last month flashed a “green light” for the first time in 18 months, showing that Taiwan’s economy is stabilizing.
Also last week, the Cabinet approved the CEPD’s proposals for the “i-Taiwan” 12 construction projects, calling for up to NT$3.99 trillion (US$123.8 billion) in investment between now and 2016, including NT$2.79 trillion in government funds and, the Cabinet hopes, NT$1.2 trillion from the private sector. It is estimated that these construction plans will boost real GDP by 2.95 percent annually and create 247,000 jobs annually.
The “i-Taiwan” projects were a major part of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) campaign platform. They include plans for a convenient, nationwide transportation network; revitalizing Kaohsiung Harbor; creating a central Taiwan high-tech industrial cluster; creating an airport city around Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport; promoting industrial innovation corridors; revitalizing cities, industrial parks, farming villages and coastal areas; reforestation; building sewers and works to combat flooding and improve water management.
In all, the proposal includes 284 construction projects, from which every part of Taiwan could expect to benefit to some extent.
But the opposition has cast doubts on the government’s motivation for highlighting these projects in the run-up to Saturday’s regional elections. In response, Cabinet Spokesman Su Jun-pin (蘇俊賓) made the astonishing claim that elections are never a factor in the government’s policy decisions.
Announcing beneficial policies at an opportune time ingratiates the government to voters. The government is using this to its advantage, as also happened under the Democratic Progressive Party administration.
Campaigning for Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidates on Kinmen a couple of days ago, Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) said construction of a bridge linking Kinmen with Xiamen, China, would start around the end of next year. The bridge proposal has been around so long that local people jokingly call it the “pontoon bridge”: It floats in the run-up to elections, but sinks as soon as they are over.
On the campaign trail in Hualien County, where the KMT faces difficulties at the polls, Ma, who is also KMT chairman, said work to electrify the east coast railway and make it double tracked would start this Friday. That happens to be the day before the elections. Of course, Ma did not forget to mention the proposed Suhua “supplementary road” either. These projects are often mentioned at election time.
The public, hit hard by the economic downturn, wants the government to propose construction projects or other ideas to boost the economy.
Any signs of economic recovery should be reported immediately, but it should come as no surprise if the government postpones such announcements to directly before the elections. It may also put off unpopular moves like raising fuel prices or increasing national health insurance fees until after votes are cast.
But Taiwan has an election almost every year. Voters would be wise to watch out for such electoral maneuvers.
Father’s Day, as celebrated around the world, has its roots in the early 20th century US. In 1910, the state of Washington marked the world’s first official Father’s Day. Later, in 1972, then-US president Richard Nixon signed a proclamation establishing the third Sunday of June as a national holiday honoring fathers. Many countries have since followed suit, adopting the same date. In Taiwan, the celebration takes a different form — both in timing and meaning. Taiwan’s Father’s Day falls on Aug. 8, a date chosen not for historical events, but for the beauty of language. In Mandarin, “eight eight” is pronounced
In a recent essay, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” a former adviser to US President Donald Trump, Christian Whiton, accuses Taiwan of diplomatic incompetence — claiming Taipei failed to reach out to Trump, botched trade negotiations and mishandled its defense posture. Whiton’s narrative overlooks a fundamental truth: Taiwan was never in a position to “win” Trump’s favor in the first place. The playing field was asymmetrical from the outset, dominated by a transactional US president on one side and the looming threat of Chinese coercion on the other. From the outset of his second term, which began in January, Trump reaffirmed his
Despite calls to the contrary from their respective powerful neighbors, Taiwan and Somaliland continue to expand their relationship, endowing it with important new prospects. Fitting into this bigger picture is the historic Coast Guard Cooperation Agreement signed last month. The common goal is to move the already strong bilateral relationship toward operational cooperation, with significant and tangible mutual benefits to be observed. Essentially, the new agreement commits the parties to a course of conduct that is expressed in three fundamental activities: cooperation, intelligence sharing and technology transfer. This reflects the desire — shared by both nations — to achieve strategic results within
It is difficult not to agree with a few points stated by Christian Whiton in his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” and yet the main idea is flawed. I am a Polish journalist who considers Taiwan her second home. I am conservative, and I might disagree with some social changes being promoted in Taiwan right now, especially the push for progressiveness backed by leftists from the West — we need to clean up our mess before blaming the Taiwanese. However, I would never think that those issues should dominate the West’s judgement of Taiwan’s geopolitical importance. The question is not whether