Last year, Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) made six Taiwan policy proposals, generally known as “Hu’s Six Points,” in a speech to commemorate the 30th anniversary of China’s “Message to Compatriots in Taiwan.” The practical implementation of these proposals in Taiwan over the past year has been the basis for development of cross-strait relations.
These are the main principles of Hu’s six points.
First, “China and Taiwan should scrupulously abide by the ‘one China’ principle to improve mutual political trust.” In response to this proposal, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has time and again reiterated the so-called “1992 consensus,” which says both sides of the Taiwan Strait belong to one country. In the eyes of Beijing, this has provided the essential prerequisite for cross-strait negotiations.
Second, “the two sides should sign a comprehensive agreement on economic cooperation to establish a mechanism with cross-strait characteristics.” Ma’s insistence on signing an economic cooperative framework agreement with China is compatible with the spirit of this proposal.
Third, “China is willing to engage in dialogue with Taiwan on cross-strait cultural and educational exchanges to promote Chinese culture.” Taiwan used to claim to represent orthodox Chinese culture, but now the Ma administration has brought up “reading standard characters while writing with simplified characters” — the first positive Taiwanese reaction in 60 years to the simplified character set used in China.
Fourth, “if the Democratic Progressive Party changes its Taiwan independence separatist position, China will make a positive response.” This is the only proposal on which the Ma government has yet to produce any desirable results.
Fifth, “under the condition that it would not lead to ‘two Chinas’ or ‘one China, one Taiwan,’ the two sides could work out fair and reasonable arrangements through pragmatic talks for Taiwan’s participation in international organizations.” In 2007, Beijing sent a letter to the WHO, requesting the inclusion of “Taiwan Province” under China in the implementation of International Health Regulations. Last year, the government attended the World Health Assembly under the name “Chinese Taipei” — a move considered by the Chinese government as participation under the “one China” framework. Apart from that, the Ma administration has suspended Taiwan’s campaign to gain membership in the UN and the WHO, to which former presidents Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) had dedicated a dozen years. The suspension sought to prevent the creation of “two Chinas” or a sovereign and independent Taiwan.
Sixth, “in the special circumstance in which China and Taiwan have yet to be reunited, the two sides could engage in pragmatic negotiations on the development of their political relations and establish a mutual military security mechanism. In addition, the two sides should discuss, under the ‘one-China’ policy, the official ending of the cross-strait state of hostilities and signing a peace accord.” At an international press conference to commemorate his first year in office, Ma said he would not rule out talks with China on political issues if he were to be re-elected in 2012, but a prerequisite would be China removing its missiles aimed at Taiwan. I believe Beijing must have paid close attention to Ma’s call.
Since last year, direct cross-strait transport links have opened and talks between the two sides have been restored. It is clear that nearly every aspect of Hu’s six points is being carried out in practice in Taiwan.
Bill Chang is an advisory committee member at Taiwan Thinktank.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS