Two sides of a coin
Michael Fagan (Letters, July 27 and Aug. 3, page 8) said that Taiwan would make the World Games world famous, but denied that the World Games would raise the international profile of Taiwan. These two things are like two sides of the same coin.
If one side is genuine, it is impossible that the other side is counterfeit or a “lie.”
Fagan’s argument was based solely on the lack of coverage of the Games in Taiwan by the international media. If the international media were lacking, how could Taiwan make the Games world famous, as indicated by Fagan?
The athletes and the audience used cellphones, Twitter and the Internet to transmit information about the Games in Taiwan to their relatives and friends throughout the world. After the athletes went back to their home countries, they also talked and wrote about Taiwan. These grass-roots communications are powerful and undeniable.
Taiwan is a country that has been isolated diplomatically and politically for decades. Taiwan, under the twisted name of “Chinese Taipei,” is treated by the World Health Assembly like a second-class country by granting it an observer status subject to annual review.
The UN is nothing but a mirage for Taiwan, with the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) having given up applying for the UN membership. In this oppressive environment, Taiwanese feel proud of having an opportunity to host the World Games and to implement them successfully. Fagan, who lives in Taiwan, should at least share some of the inner feelings of the Taiwanese.
CHARLES HONG
Columbus, Ohio
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then