Notes from Bilingual School
Nowadays there are two types of government schools in Taiwan: Chinese and bilingual. A government Chinese school offers basic classes (math, science and history) in a Chinese-language setting.
A government bilingual school — a school that allows students with expat parents to study in English and Chinese — offers the same classes as the Chinese-language schools but are taught in an English-language setting.
Having a father who works at the Hsinchu Science Park has allowed me to attend the Hsinchu Science Park Bilingual School. I want to share some of my experiences and observations after four years there.
In Grade 4, my second year at the Bilingual School, my friends and I would see lots of kids from the Chinese Department — students not taking English studies — walking around the running tracks. We were really curious about them because we didn’t know them.
One day, when our class was playing soccer during Physical Education class, we heard someone shouting. We stopped playing and tried to find out the source of the noise. It was the “Chinese kids.” When we listened closer, we found out that they were complaining about how bad we were playing. Some boys in our class insulted them back in English.
The kids in the Chinese Department were confused by this and started asking each other what we meant.
This incident made me think about how lucky I am to speak Chinese and English.
During Grade 6, I started to sometimes wonder why some students were in the Bilingual School at all.
An example of this was one of my classmates. He was pretty good in most subjects, such as Chinese, math and science, but when it came to English class, he usually said: “It’s so boring.”
He would complain during English class because he wasn’t good at English.
Actually, he was not the only one in my class who did this. A few others are also good at Chinese but bad at English. Do these students really want to be in a bilingual setting?
The Bilingual School’s emphasis is allowing students to learn and understand more about the English language. Some students don’t want to be in the Bilingual Department since they don’t understand or enjoy the language; these students belong in a Chinese-language setting.
Throughout Grade 3 to Grade 6, I was very surprised at the extent to which my classmates enjoyed the “latest trends” that come from the West.
One example of this was the number of girls in my class who read the popular American novel Twilight. The boys — including me — in my class also enjoyed new American music artists and video games. Most of the boys in the class were crazy about a video game series called Halo (again, from the West). It was always on our “must-play list.”
The point I am making is that even though they are living in Taiwan, students at my school have developed these Western trends. Maybe it’s because of the Internet, classmates who “study” these trends or quite possibly just from learning in a foreign, English-language school environment. Overall, these trends are great for entertainment but bad for concentrating on studies and tests.
Do I enjoy being at the school? Yes. The Bilingual School environment provides friends, entertainment and English courses that you cannot find in other schools. It might be a little hard to get used to this environment if it is your first year in Taiwan, and the compulsory Chinese courses can be difficult. Still, I’m glad that the Bilingual School provides other courses of interest such as computers, art and music.
The best part is that you can learn to understand both Chinese and English — not something you can find everywhere.
SAMUEL HSIA
Jhubei, Hsinchu County
Remarkable resemblance
Your front-page story “No surprises as Ma elected next KMT chairman” (July 27) reads: “Ma [Ying-jeou, 馬英九], the sole candidate, received 285,354 of 303,987 votes, or 93.87 percent,” while the page 5 story “Macau chooses new chief executive” reads: “[Fernando] Chui’s [崔世安] election was a formality because he was the only candidate. He won the support of 282, or 94 percent, of [the city’s] chief executive electoral committee, formed mostly by people with ties to Beijing.”
Remarkably similar.
EDMUND RYDEN
Sinjhuang, Taipei County
Games fame
Michael Fagan (Letters, July 27, page 8) was partly right in saying that Taiwan would make the World Games world-famous. Those who could not distinguish between the World Games and the Olympics or the Paralympics now understand the differences between them.
But Fagan should accept the fact that the World Games raised Taiwan’s international profile. Taiwan is a well-known name, but often replaced by confusing titles like “Chinese Taipei” and “Republic of China” by politicians who consider “Taiwan” to be taboo.
Even in Kaohsiung, the Taiwanese team was called “Chinese Taipei.” Fortunately, the Games were held in Taiwan; had they been held in Kaohsiung, Chinese Taipei, some athletes might have gone to Taipei or even China.
Fagan is correct in calling Taiwan a “country.” But some, including President Ma Ying-jeou, see Taiwan as a region of “one China” as if it were a special administrative region or a province. Many license plates carry the name “Taiwan Province” even though the provincial government was abolished more than a decade ago.
Taiwan is a democratic country, but its government still worships deceased tyrants. Some people like to call Taiwan “the orphan of Asia” because it does not enjoy recognition by major countries nor enjoy participation in the UN or other international organizations. Taiwan’s international profile is vital to its identity.
CHARLES HONG
Columbus, Ohio
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS