The government’s efforts to boost domestic demand will be meaningless if unemployment continues to rise and wages continue to fall.
According to the latest unemployment and wages data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS), the jobless rate hit a modern-era record of 5.82 percent last month, with the number of unemployed rising by 8,000 from the previous month to 633,000.
The average monthly income, meanwhile, dropped by a record 8.54 percent year-on-year to NT$47,107 during the first four months of the year. That figure is the lowest since 2003 and represents an income reduction of NT$4,399 per month per person.
The average monthly income includes regular wages, overtime and bonuses. Without overtime and bonuses, the average regular wage fell by a record 3.04 percent to NT$35,488 in the first four months, a cut of NT$1,031 per month per employee from a year earlier, according to the DGBAS data.
Taiwan is among the hardest-hit export-oriented nations in the Asia-Pacific region. To revive the economy, the government has budgeted NT$149.16 billion in stimulus spending this year to create between 190,000 and 220,000 jobs. This figure does not include the NT$85.7 billion consumer voucher program that was rolled out earlier this year, though it was hoped that this program could also boost consumer spending and keep the economy humming.
Economists are now predicting that the economy will move into positive territory in the fourth quarter — in short, they are saying the worst is over. However, for wage earners, job security remains the biggest concern as the global economic downturn continues. Tightfistedness has become a priority as households cope with declining incomes.
Taiwan already enjoys a considerably high savings rate of about 30 percent, based on the most recent data compiled by DGBAS.
But since welfare mechanisms for the unemployed are weaker than in most other developed countries, wage earners have developed a tendency to put aside more money in preparation for bad times.
Such caution in discretionary spending is creating an unheralded counter-balance to the government’s stimulus plans, and this phenomenon will drag the economy down further rather than boost demand. John Maynard Keynes’ theory of “paradox of thrift” states that the more money consumers save, the less demand exists and the more damage is inflicted on the economy — especially during a slowdown.
This paradox can partially explain why the nation’s domestic economy — including the retail, wholesale and restaurant sectors — dropped 12.25 percent year-on-year to NT$4.8 trillion in the first five months of the year, despite the government’s fiscal stimulus measures to kick-start spending.
Interestingly, and ironically, the savings paradox frowns on the conventional wisdom that thrift is virtuous. For individuals, there is nothing wrong with frugality during an economic downturn; such people don’t have to change their behavior very much to adjust to hard times. But for the government, this situation only validates public concerns about the inadequacy of social welfare networks, and there are implications flowing from this on the effectiveness of fiscal stimulus efforts.
If the government proceeds with more spending as part of its stimulus programs, policymakers should be mindful of the consequences of neglecting job security and falling wages. Otherwise it could find that its efforts to revive the economy will be futile — together with the attendant political risk.
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) first suggested a mass recall of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, the Taipei Times called the idea “not only absurd, but also deeply undemocratic” (“Lai’s speech and legislative chaos,” Jan. 6, page 8). In a subsequent editorial (“Recall chaos plays into KMT hands,” Jan. 9, page 8), the paper wrote that his suggestion was not a solution, and that if it failed, it would exacerbate the enmity between the parties and lead to a cascade of revenge recalls. The danger came from having the DPP orchestrate a mass recall. As it transpired,
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at