With ASEAN Plus One (China) and ASEAN Plus Three (China, Japan and South Korea) coming into effect next year and in 2015 respectively, highly competitive Japanese and South Korean products such as semiconductors, liquid-crystal displays, petrochemicals and machinery will be given tax-exempt access to the ASEAN market, which accounts for 15 percent of Taiwan’s exports.
With the exception of some products that enjoy tax exemption within the WTO framework, Taiwanese exports will be subject to a tax rate of approximately 6 percent, which happens to equal the net profit margin of the nation’s industries. This will put Taiwan in an unfavorable position.
Furthermore, these industries account for nearly 20 percent of the nation’s production value and 15 percent of the nation’s GDP. If the government lets them wither, it would make the unemployment situation worse. However, an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) is aimed at promoting economic and trade liberalization across the Taiwan Strait rather than between Taiwan and ASEAN or between Taiwan and Japan or South Korea.
In other words, even if Taiwan were to ink an economic pact with China, Taiwanese products would not enjoy preferential treatment from ASEAN members, let alone free trade with Japan and Korea.
In economics, tariff-jumping means that when faced with high export tariffs, companies may choose to move to a location that allows them to escape tariffs. For example, Japanese car companies set up manufacturing plants in the US to deal with US import tariffs. By the same logic, when ASEAN Plus Three takes effect, Taiwan’s exports will face higher tariffs, possibly leading companies to relocate their factories to places that impose lower tariffs.
Given this situation, the Taiwanese manufacturing industry would wither away, but this is just the beginning of the story.
Over the past 20 years of globalization, Taiwanese companies have set up factories throughout the ASEAN area and in China. Thus, after ASEAN Plus Three comes into effect, Taiwanese companies will not lose their competitiveness, but they will become less competitive by setting up factories in Taiwan.
The root cause of the problem lies in Taiwan’s industrial structure. If the government protects the industries that are in keen competition with South Korea, they are likely to move overseas following the launch of ASEAN Plus Three to evade increased costs from tariffs. An economic agreement with China would still lead to closures of Taiwanese companies unless Taiwan can transform and provide these industries with more advanced raw materials and technological licensing. In addition, to comply with regulations for a certificate of origin, it is likely that more Taiwanese companies will move their factories to China.
On the other hand, if Taiwan can extricate itself from the predicament arising out of intense competition with South Korea and heavy dependence on Japanese technology, and instead emulate northern European countries by developing new and innovative industries, ASEAN Plus Three would have little effect on Taiwan. Then, signing an economic pact with China would only normalize cross-strait economic and trade exchanges rather than relieve any pressure caused by the launch of ASEAN Plus Three.
The importance of upgrading the nation’s industrial structure has been overshadowed by the dispute over whether cross-strait trade should be normalized. This has also diverted the focus from the very important issue of the future development of Taiwanese industry.
Lian Ke-shaw is a doctoral candidate in international trade at National Chengchi University.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
The arrest in France of Telegram founder and CEO Pavel Durov has brought into sharp focus one of the major conflicts of our age. On one hand, we want privacy in our digital lives, which is why we like the kind of end-to-end encryption Telegram promises. On the other, we want the government to be able to stamp out repugnant online activities — such as child pornography or terrorist plotting. The reality is that we cannot have our cake and eat it, too. Durov last month was charged with complicity in crimes taking place on the app, including distributing child pornography,
RSS