Reports that the government is considering using the nation’s foreign exchange reserves to revive the economy have recently become a topic of much discussion.
As of late last month, Taiwan’s foreign reserves amounted to US$294.1 billion. Reserves sufficient to cover imports for three to six months are usually thought to be quite enough for any country. However, considering Taiwan’s unique international position, our vulnerability to unexpected financial crises and our lack of access to assistance from the IMF, accumulating greater reserves is reasonable. Beyond that, however, although massive reserves may look good for national prestige, they do not have much substantial benefit. A country that accumulates excessive reserves is like a miser who is too stingy to shop, leaving his valuable assets idle.
Now that a global financial crisis has struck, the government’s proposal to use the country’s foreign reserves to boost the economy is both legitimate and timely. However, the special features of foreign currency reserves must be considered. Generally, these reserves should not be released within the domestic economy, as doing so may cause inflation. Also, since national reserves are the public’s shared wealth, the government should obtain the legislature’s endorsement before using them. How and where they should be spent is open to discussion, but the parameters should be clearly defined, so that those mandated with implementing policy can do so with a clear basis in law and will not be overcautious.
Foreign reserves can be spent abroad to the benefit of both sides. Many examples can be found in the practice of foreign aid. Simply put, a donor country can use its reserves through donations or loans to support specific construction projects in a recipient country, on condition that the recipient purchases items necessary for the projects from the donor. Thus, both sides can benefit.
Applied to Taiwan’s current situation, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs could, for example, inquire among our diplomatic allies and other friendly countries as to whether any of them needs loans to purchase computers. If, say, a particular country wants to purchase 1 million computers for its schoolchildren, we can provide it with a loan, either directly or indirectly through the Asian Development Bank or other international organizations, on condition that the recipient country buy the computers from Taiwan. The loan can be paid back in interest-free installments over a number of years. Such a measure would enable Taiwan’s ailing computer manufacturers to quickly re-employ their redundant workers and get their production lines moving again.
Another feasible plan would be for diplomats to survey how many people in neighboring countries are interested in visiting Taiwan. Let us say 1 million people want to visit Taiwan each year. After checking the potential visitors’ credit status, the government could turn part of its foreign reserves into travel loans through international banks. If each traveler is given a loan of US$2,000 and stays in Taiwan for one week, they could boost Taiwan’s domestic demand by NT$70 billion each year. Tourism-related businesses would reap the benefits directly, and the multiplier effect would be at least as great as that generated by the recent issue of consumer vouchers. As with foreign aid, the interest-free loans to visitors can be paid back when the global economy picks up.
If the government can apply our precious foreign reserves in effective ways, it can help bring about an early recovery from the recession and ensure its the public’s welfare.
Eric Wang is an economics professor at the Graduate Institute of International Economics at National Chung Cheng University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS