Down to basics
Simplicity and a strong focus on the fundamental issues are keys to greater insights. Focusing on the simple truth in the current debate regarding an economic agreement between China and Taiwan will help us all to grasp the consequences of an accord.
The simple truth is that China has set the “one China” principle as a precondition for an agreement. China has been consistent about this simple truth. The truth is that China wants Taiwan to be a part of the People’s Republic of China.
This simple truth is valid no matter the name of the agreement. In addition, it is valid even if Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄) recently apparently tried to change the name of the “one China” principle to a “one China political framework,” which no one has heard of.
It does not help the heated debate in Taiwan to change titles and talk about a “one China political framework” that does not exist. It will only add confusion.
The simple truth is that Taiwanese have to answer one simple question about an economic agreement with China: Does Taiwan want to be a part of the People’s Republic of China? If yes, then accept China’s “one China” condition. But if the answer is negative, Taiwan has to avoid the “one China” condition. If the debate is focused on this fundamental question first, it is much easier to understand the consequences and discuss the remaining economic topics.
MICHAEL DANIELSEN
Chairman, Taiwan Corner
Copenhagen
More English reading
It is interesting that some educators are eager to provide explanations for a phenomenon that may not exist. The Taipei Times reported that there was a sharp increase in the number of students who scored zero in English composition in their college entrance exams, although the writing exam contained “a more complicated and difficult writing topic” (“Teachers lament poor scores in English,” March 15, page 2).
Whether or not writing ability in English really is deteriorating, those interested in improving students’ written English might consult the research, which says consistently that writers acquire the conventions of the written language largely by reading. This is true in first and second-language development, and much of the research has been done in Taiwan.
Improvement in student writing therefore requires access to a large amount of interesting and comprehensible reading material in English, which is sadly not available to many students.
STEPHEN KRASHEN
Los Angeles, California
I believe that the article on poor English scores misses an important point: Reading significant amounts of understandable English throughout the learning process is more important than writing classes.
I work with ESL/EFL students from all continents. The best writers are the readers — always. When I complimented a recent TOEFL tutoring student from Spain on his superb writing, I asked him how he learned to write so well. Without hesitation he replied: “Reading essays from the New York Times.”
Virtually all English instruction focuses on memorizing rules and vocabulary, while most fluency comes from understandable input — reading and listening to high-interest English that the student can understand. Time to read and listen, accompanied by more reading and listening resources, is the key.
WARREN EDIGER
La Habra, California
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
RSS