Senior advisers and national policy advisers to the president are products of past authoritarian rule, a way for a despotic leadership to create a class of nobility.
When the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government withdrew to Taiwan, it meant that all party and government leaders gathered here. The government’s efforts to recover the mainland relied heavily on them, which made it necessary to create these positions.
Taiwan no longer hopes to recover the Chinese mainland, and, in addition, is now a democracy. It is only natural to abolish this remnant of the authoritarian era.
Although the KMT used this system of senior and national policy advisers, it limited the appointments to those who had served as president of the Cabinet, the legislature, the Control Yuan, the Examination Yuan or the Judicial Yuan.
Only those who had served as vice presidents of one of the five yuan, minister, or minister without portfolio could serve as a national policy advisor.
By 2000, Taiwan had democratized, and when the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) came to power for the first time in that year, it lacked any former yuan presidents or vice presidents and ministers.
The party mainly appointed hired hands, financial supporters and grassroots political leaders to these positions, in practice using the state apparatus to further its own interests.
The same phenomenon occurred with the Presidential Office’s award of medals of honor, as many recipients included the same people.
Since the DPP lacked members who had served as yuan president or ministers, it should have used this as an opportunity to abolish the system but instead it perpetuated the KMT’s authoritarian system by appointing unqualified supporters as advisers, thus turning the positions into a resource for reward sharing.
In addition, the posts existed in form only and advisers had nothing to advise on, simply wasting substantial government resources.
In the past, the main function of these advisers was to serve as chairman or members on some senior politician’s funeral committee and standing in the front row to show off their titles at public funeral ceremonies.
Fortunately, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) realized that there was no value in having these advisers, and so he made the wise decision to stop appointing senior and national policy advisers in June 2006
This not only saved national budget resources but also ended a relic of past authoritarian rule. This may have been a case of “delayed justice” but it was highly praised by the general public.
There have been reports that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is planning to resume the appointment of senior and national policy advisers, and the Presidential Office has allocated NT$90 million (US$2.7 million) to this purpose for next year.
It is disappointing to see that the Presidential Office is busy doling out spoils, and it shows that Ma stacks up badly compared to Chen in this regard.
It would be progress if Ma fully abolished the system Chen stopped using, but if he instead reinstates the system, he will be turning back the clock, and this will become part of his legacy.
Ma’s only political achievements after five months in power are to have proposed construction projects and appointing members to the Control Yuan and Examination Yuan to reward supporters.
Now, he is wasting public funds by turning the Presidential Office into a retirement home for advisers.
If he doesn’t understand that he must review his inability to start dealing with national policy, save the economy, alleviate the suffering of the poor, relieve disaster victims, prevent disasters from happening and try to understand why his approval ratings stand at 23 percent — even lower than Chen after eight years of rule tainted by money laundering accusations — and instead do what is right, he will be cast off.
An outstanding leader must put party and personal interests aside. He or she must have great vision, wisdom and the ability to rule. Approval ratings will shoot up if he or she runs the nation in accordance with the law and the system, and there is no need to make any ridiculous appointment outside the system.
Ma should pull back before it is too late, stop flirting with authoritarianism and abolish the positions of senior and national policy advisers that were created by an authoritarian regime 60 years ago.
Otherwise, this self-proclaimed thrifty president, who likes to eat lunchbox food and only spent NT$870,000 on decorating the presidential residence, is simply acting.
Legislators with a conscience from both the pan-blue and the pan-green camps should refuse to review the proposed budget for appointing advisers, and should abolish the authoritarian design stipulated in the Organic Law of the Presidential Office (總統府組織法) immediately, in order to meet democratic standards.
There is no room for political compensation in a democracy.
George Huang is a former chairman of the Central Election Commission.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
RSS