There have been cross-strait news exchanges for 20 years -- from significant to insignificant, from rarely to frequently. Recently, exchanges seem to have gone smoothly, but there are problems that we should take into consideration.
Looking back to 1987, Hsu Lu (
Although China sees the media as a propaganda tool, it is still willing to promote cross-strait news exchanges since the Chinese government still has absolute control over the media and can distort the final product. Even though Taiwanese media outlets and reporters can apply to gather news in China, they still have to comply with official arrangements.
A minority of Taiwanese media outlets that want to expand into the Chinese market cooperate with the local authorities and thus directly or indirectly, deliberately or inadvertently, dance to China's tune. For this privilege they abandon any media autonomy they might have.
Even if there are a few Taiwanese reporters brave enough to report on issues like government corruption, the reports can only be published in Taiwan. Chinese reporters who come to Taiwan also must follow the Chinese government's directives and arrangements, making it almost impossible for them to produce independent news coverage.
There have been cases where Chinese journalists have produced false or distorted reporting. Chinese reporters who can travel to Taiwan mainly come from media outlets belonging to the central government.
However, China is constantly accusing Taiwan of hindering news exchanges, including accusations of government-imposed restrictions on Chinese journalists in Taiwan and of pressure put on interviewees through intelligence agencies.
To mark the 20th anniversary of cross-strait news exchanges, China has put forward a proposal to establish a system for permanent reporting. It would appear that the Chinese government intends to deepen the exchange, but given the current situation this proposal will only increase bias and intensify China's unification propaganda. But if Taiwan doesn't agree, it will inevitably fall into the trap set by China's accusation of obstructing cross-strait news exchanges.
In order to correct the defects of cross-strait news exchanges, Taiwan should push for an equal expansion of exchanges to increase the frequency of Chinese local media outlets participating in the news exchange. Local media outlets in China will therefore have a higher level of autonomy.
Second, the government should suggest prioritizing which Chinese media outlets can base their reporters in Taiwan based on the outlet's circulations and viewer ratings.
Lastly, Taiwan should propose test exchanges between media outlets on each side of the Taiwan Strait. For example, media can conduct reciprocal sales of their publications at exhibitions and selected sales points. These suggestions are legitimate and sufficient ways of correcting the defects in current cross-strait news exchanges. They also represent democratic values and free market operations.
Weber Lai is an associate professor in the Graduate School of Applied Media Arts at National Taiwan University of Arts.
Translated by Ted Yang
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
Heavy rains over the past week have overwhelmed southern and central Taiwan, with flooding, landslides, road closures, damage to property and the evacuations of thousands of people. Schools and offices were closed in some areas due to the deluge throughout the week. The heavy downpours brought by the southwest monsoon are a second blow to a region still recovering from last month’s Typhoon Danas. Strong winds and significant rain from the storm inflicted more than NT$2.6 billion (US$86.6 million) in agricultural losses, and damaged more than 23,000 roofs and a record high of nearly 2,500 utility poles, causing power outages. As
The greatest pressure Taiwan has faced in negotiations stems from its continuously growing trade surplus with the US. Taiwan’s trade surplus with the US reached an unprecedented high last year, surging by 54.6 percent from the previous year and placing it among the top six countries with which the US has a trade deficit. The figures became Washington’s primary reason for adopting its firm stance and demanding substantial concessions from Taipei, which put Taiwan at somewhat of a disadvantage at the negotiating table. Taiwan’s most crucial bargaining chip is undoubtedly its key position in the global semiconductor supply chain, which led
RSS