There have been cross-strait news exchanges for 20 years -- from significant to insignificant, from rarely to frequently. Recently, exchanges seem to have gone smoothly, but there are problems that we should take into consideration.
Looking back to 1987, Hsu Lu (
Although China sees the media as a propaganda tool, it is still willing to promote cross-strait news exchanges since the Chinese government still has absolute control over the media and can distort the final product. Even though Taiwanese media outlets and reporters can apply to gather news in China, they still have to comply with official arrangements.
A minority of Taiwanese media outlets that want to expand into the Chinese market cooperate with the local authorities and thus directly or indirectly, deliberately or inadvertently, dance to China's tune. For this privilege they abandon any media autonomy they might have.
Even if there are a few Taiwanese reporters brave enough to report on issues like government corruption, the reports can only be published in Taiwan. Chinese reporters who come to Taiwan also must follow the Chinese government's directives and arrangements, making it almost impossible for them to produce independent news coverage.
There have been cases where Chinese journalists have produced false or distorted reporting. Chinese reporters who can travel to Taiwan mainly come from media outlets belonging to the central government.
However, China is constantly accusing Taiwan of hindering news exchanges, including accusations of government-imposed restrictions on Chinese journalists in Taiwan and of pressure put on interviewees through intelligence agencies.
To mark the 20th anniversary of cross-strait news exchanges, China has put forward a proposal to establish a system for permanent reporting. It would appear that the Chinese government intends to deepen the exchange, but given the current situation this proposal will only increase bias and intensify China's unification propaganda. But if Taiwan doesn't agree, it will inevitably fall into the trap set by China's accusation of obstructing cross-strait news exchanges.
In order to correct the defects of cross-strait news exchanges, Taiwan should push for an equal expansion of exchanges to increase the frequency of Chinese local media outlets participating in the news exchange. Local media outlets in China will therefore have a higher level of autonomy.
Second, the government should suggest prioritizing which Chinese media outlets can base their reporters in Taiwan based on the outlet's circulations and viewer ratings.
Lastly, Taiwan should propose test exchanges between media outlets on each side of the Taiwan Strait. For example, media can conduct reciprocal sales of their publications at exhibitions and selected sales points. These suggestions are legitimate and sufficient ways of correcting the defects in current cross-strait news exchanges. They also represent democratic values and free market operations.
Weber Lai is an associate professor in the Graduate School of Applied Media Arts at National Taiwan University of Arts.
Translated by Ted Yang
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS