There have been cross-strait news exchanges for 20 years -- from significant to insignificant, from rarely to frequently. Recently, exchanges seem to have gone smoothly, but there are problems that we should take into consideration.
Looking back to 1987, Hsu Lu (
Although China sees the media as a propaganda tool, it is still willing to promote cross-strait news exchanges since the Chinese government still has absolute control over the media and can distort the final product. Even though Taiwanese media outlets and reporters can apply to gather news in China, they still have to comply with official arrangements.
A minority of Taiwanese media outlets that want to expand into the Chinese market cooperate with the local authorities and thus directly or indirectly, deliberately or inadvertently, dance to China's tune. For this privilege they abandon any media autonomy they might have.
Even if there are a few Taiwanese reporters brave enough to report on issues like government corruption, the reports can only be published in Taiwan. Chinese reporters who come to Taiwan also must follow the Chinese government's directives and arrangements, making it almost impossible for them to produce independent news coverage.
There have been cases where Chinese journalists have produced false or distorted reporting. Chinese reporters who can travel to Taiwan mainly come from media outlets belonging to the central government.
However, China is constantly accusing Taiwan of hindering news exchanges, including accusations of government-imposed restrictions on Chinese journalists in Taiwan and of pressure put on interviewees through intelligence agencies.
To mark the 20th anniversary of cross-strait news exchanges, China has put forward a proposal to establish a system for permanent reporting. It would appear that the Chinese government intends to deepen the exchange, but given the current situation this proposal will only increase bias and intensify China's unification propaganda. But if Taiwan doesn't agree, it will inevitably fall into the trap set by China's accusation of obstructing cross-strait news exchanges.
In order to correct the defects of cross-strait news exchanges, Taiwan should push for an equal expansion of exchanges to increase the frequency of Chinese local media outlets participating in the news exchange. Local media outlets in China will therefore have a higher level of autonomy.
Second, the government should suggest prioritizing which Chinese media outlets can base their reporters in Taiwan based on the outlet's circulations and viewer ratings.
Lastly, Taiwan should propose test exchanges between media outlets on each side of the Taiwan Strait. For example, media can conduct reciprocal sales of their publications at exhibitions and selected sales points. These suggestions are legitimate and sufficient ways of correcting the defects in current cross-strait news exchanges. They also represent democratic values and free market operations.
Weber Lai is an associate professor in the Graduate School of Applied Media Arts at National Taiwan University of Arts.
Translated by Ted Yang
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
As the highest elected official in the nation’s capital, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) is the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate-in-waiting for a presidential bid. With the exception of Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕), Chiang is the most likely KMT figure to take over the mantle of the party leadership. All the other usual suspects, from Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) to KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) have already been rejected at the ballot box. Given such high expectations, Chiang should be demonstrating resolve, calm-headedness and political wisdom in how he faces tough
RSS