The bill proposed by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to investigate crimes committed during the 228 Incident and the White Terror era has once again led to conflict between the pan-blue and pan-green camps. Issues like this always follow the same line: the DPP attacks while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends itself.
For instance, both the referendum on reclaiming the KMT's stolen assets and the referendum on seeking UN membership are DPP electoral tactics.
Although the KMT retaliated by proposing an anti-corruption referendum and a referendum on re-entering the UN, it can been seen from the confrontation between the two parties over voting procedures that the intent of the KMT is only to boycott the referendums. This indicates that its proposed referendum is merely a smokescreen.
Looking at the conflict between the two parties, the DPP doesn't act as if it is in power, but rather in opposition, while the opposition party doesn't act like the opposition, but behaves as if it is still in power.
A distinguishing feature of an opposition party is its lack of governmental resources, making the deployment of organizational strategies more difficult. But it has the advantage of bearing no political burdens, so it's easier for the opposition to attack the weaknesses of the ruling party.
As the opposition party does not shoulder the responsibility of governing, it doesn't have to spend time on governing strategies. Instead, the opposition should focus on the employment of electoral tactics and determining which issues concern voters the most.
On the other hand, as the ruling party controls governmental resources, it can easily develop connections with the public; yet, because of the burden of being in power, it also has to place importance on its long-term political strategies.
After becoming the opposition party, the KMT lost governmental resources, but it did not undergo transformation and still uses connections as its major campaign strategy.
Connections can be useful in local elections, but they are not as influential on a national scale. The KMT should have found some issues that can relate to the public, but unfortunately, it acts as if it were still in power, failing not only to raise issues of public concern, but still tarred with the legacy of the old KMT regime.
The 228 Incident and cases from the White Terror era still serve as "ballot-attracting machines" for the DPP. The DDP only has to bring these issues up ahead of an election and the ballots will automatically rush in.
If the KMT could eliminate the vestiges of the old KMT era, it would have a wide range of possibilities. Unfortunately, the KMT appears to prefer to hold onto the past, leaving it a walking target for criticism. The presidential election is going to be very difficult for that party.
The DPP has been in power for almost eight years and controls governmental resources. It should be easy for it to develop its human resources and make plans for long-term governance. This means it should have some ideas for a long-term strategy -- but the DPP looks no further than the next election. It is not making an effort for the country, the pan-green camp, nor the party as a whole.
Some people have criticized it, saying that for the DPP every day is an election day, and it has yet to enter the ruling stage.
The DPP's development of its human resources has been very limited. In the political world, such a party usually quickly returns to opposition. But the DPP was lucky enough to run into a stupid opponent -- a KMT that clings to its past, making it a perfect target for DPP potshots. Come election time, the DPP will just continue to rely on ideology and win a lot of votes.
In the time of the dangwai(outside the party) movement, a dangwai politician had only to hold a lecture and people would flock to listen. Audience members would then pass the information they had learned to others, and this had a strong influence on election campaigns.
After the government was democratized, much more information became easily available. Because of this, the people could get their information directly from the media and weren't interested in lectures anymore.
Yet every election, the DPP still follows its dangwai era habits, with a focus on lectures, even though few show up to listen. So they the party has to mobilize its members to drum up an audience -- which doesn't help with election campaigns.
The DPP seems to be as equally trapped by its opposition party past as the KMT is with its history.
Chen Mao-hsiung is an electrical engineering professor at National Sun Yat-sen University and head of the Association for the Promotion of Taiwan's Security.
Translated by Ted Yang and Anna Stiggelbout
On Tuesday, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) issued a statement criticizing Song Siyao (宋思瑤), a student from Shanghai’s Fudan University, saying she had offended the sensibilities of Taiwanese. It also called for the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation — established by former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) — which had organized the tour group, to remind group members to be careful with their statements. Song, during a visit to a baseball stadium in Taichung, said that the tour group “would like to congratulate China, Taipei team (中國台北隊) ... we wish mainland China and Taiwan compatriots can be like the team Chinatrust Brothers and
“Integrated Diplomacy” (總和外交) is the guiding principle of Taiwan’s current foreign policy. It seeks to mobilize technology, capital and talent for global outreach, strengthening Taiwan’s international connections. However, without a robust information security mechanism, such efforts risk being reduced to superficial courtesy calls. Security clearance serves as the “entrance examination results” for government agency personnel in sensitive positions, qualifying them to access sensitive information. Senior aides in the US Congress must also possess security clearance to assist lawmakers in handling classified budgets. However, security clearance is not an automatic right or a blanket necessity for accessing sensitive information. Access is granted only
Late on Tuesday evening, South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol declared martial law. A BBC analysis cited as reasons the opposition parties’ majority in the National Assembly, their continued boycott of the national budget and the impeachment of key officials and prosecutors, leading to frequent government gridlock. During the years that Taiwan and South Korea traveled the road to democratization, our countries hit many potholes. Taiwan cannot return to the Martial Law era. Despite the similarities in our authoritarian past, Yoon’s political travails are far removed from the issues Taiwan faces. Yoon’s actions are a wake-up call to the world about
Imagine that you are fully conscious, but your family, friends and healthcare workers all believe you are vegetative. You hear people discussing euthanasia, cessation of medical treatment, or moving you to a long-term care facility, none of which are able to monitor for signs of recovery. Illness is intrinsically terrifying, but nothing terrifies more than to be fully aware while those you love and those who decide your medical fate regard you as nothing more than an insentient collection of water, calcium and organic molecules. Fifteen years ago, it was discovered that more than 40 percent of patients diagnosed as
RSS