Five bus companies in southern Taiwan recently announced that they will soon stop services in rural areas. This situation has highlighted problems with the government's highway transportation policy and the commuting rights of rural passengers, operators' profitability requirements and insufficient government subsidies and the difficulties experienced by authorities and operators. More routes in remote areas nationwide could now be at risk.
The main problem with transportation in remote areas lies in the long-standing practice of exchanging votes for bus routes. These mixed routes have become a heavy burden for operators who have to rely on government subsidies to continue services.
In the vicious cycle of limited budgets and opaque operational costs, rural residents' transportation rights are often sacrificed to route integration.
Under the "single-member-district system" that is being introduced with next month's legislative elections, it is clear that candidates tend more toward local issues. Route operation in remote areas may become even more difficult in the future.
Rural transportation problems are the result of politics, social welfare concerns, financial issues, regional development and traffic engineering. The proposed solutions -- including reviews of route integration, reduction or cancelation of daily runs and increases in local government subsidies -- cannot fundamentally and effectively resolve the conflict between transportation needs, profit requirements and the government's financial burden.
How should we deal with this complex issue?
Perhaps the Brazilian city of Curitiba, praised as "the most innovative city in the world" by the UN, could stimulate the imagination of the public and private sectors.
Curitiba's low-chassis "Bus Rapid System" is as efficient as New York's subway system during rush hour, at only one-fortieth of the cost. Through the flat rate policy, passengers can take buses between urban and rural areas an unlimited number of times. Even rural residents can go anywhere in urban areas at a low cost.
In addition to traffic rights in rural areas and transportation efficiency in urban areas, the design of the system has also balanced the distribution of more popular and less popular routes.
Instead of distributing profits according to the number of passengers, the Brazilians distribute them according to mileage. This assures that both popular and less popular routes can coexist without operators having to subsidize the less popular routes.
The bus operators will also be weaned off government subsidies by calculating reasonable rates and costs, reversing the economic and social value of operating routes in remote areas.
Curitiba's system shows that subsidies are not the best solution to public transportation in remote areas.
The problem can hardly be resolved by a single traffic policy, so it may be necessary to return to square one and consider the possibility of various integration plans.
The central and local governments, as well as politicians, that want to seize this opportunity for reform should get rid of the pattern of interest distribution and construct a complete plan, so residents in remote areas can also enjoy convenient and rapid transportation.
Chang Wei-hsiu is a doctoral candidate in the Graduate Institute of Building and Planning at National Taiwan University. Chen Hung-ying is also a student in the graduate institute.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Taiwan has lost Trump. Or so a former State Department official and lobbyist would have us believe. Writing for online outlet Domino Theory in an article titled “How Taiwan lost Trump,” Christian Whiton provides a litany of reasons that the William Lai (賴清德) and Donald Trump administrations have supposedly fallen out — and it’s all Lai’s fault. Although many of Whiton’s claims are misleading or ill-informed, the article is helpfully, if unintentionally, revealing of a key aspect of the MAGA worldview. Whiton complains of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party’s “inability to understand and relate to the New Right in America.” Many
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) earlier this month raised its travel alert for China’s Guangdong Province to Level 2 “Alert,” advising travelers to take enhanced precautions amid a chikungunya outbreak in the region. More than 8,000 cases have been reported in the province since June. Chikungunya is caused by the chikungunya virus and transmitted to humans through bites from infected mosquitoes, most commonly Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. These species thrive in warm, humid climates and are also major vectors for dengue, Zika and yellow fever. The disease is characterized by high fever and severe, often incapacitating joint pain.
In nature, there is a group of insects known as parasitoid wasps. Their reproductive process differs entirely from that of ordinary wasps — the female lays her eggs inside or on the bodies of other insects, and, once hatched, the larvae feed on the host’s body. The larvae do not kill the host insect immediately; instead, they carefully avoid vital organs, allowing the host to stay alive until the larvae are fully mature. That living reservoir strategy ensures a stable and fresh source of nutrients for the larvae as they grow. However, the host’s death becomes only a matter of time. The resemblance
Most countries are commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II with condemnations of militarism and imperialism, and commemoration of the global catastrophe wrought by the war. On the other hand, China is to hold a military parade. According to China’s state-run Xinhua news agency, Beijing is conducting the military parade in Tiananmen Square on Sept. 3 to “mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II and the victory of the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression.” However, during World War II, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) had not yet been established. It
RSS