After reading the report "Fake shark fins may be infiltrating the Taiwan market" (Nov. 24, page 2) I felt terrible.
I do believe that I have eaten fake shark fin in open-air banquets, but I don't think that I could eat the real thing.
About a year ago, one of my classmates gave a touching report in class.
She showed many pictures of people who were hurting sharks.
What I saw were bleeding animals whose fins had been cut.
They hadn't been killed, but they were seriously injured and would die in the end. At the end of the presentation, I decided to refuse to eat shark fin.
I suggest that the government and activist groups publicize the cruel behavior of the people who mutilate sharks.
A great number of sharks have died because of the "delicious" fins that humans enjoy.
People can live without eating fins, but sharks can't live without them.
Perhaps the government could give food manufacturers incentives to make alternative foods -- products that have a shark fin flavor but which pose no threat to human health.
Those who take pity on de-finned sharks must be willing to choose alternatives and discourage the market for the real thing.
Chen Mei-ling
Hsinchu
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS