Taiwan is in a quandary. China is watching like a hawk to prevent it from flapping its wings internationally by, for instance, seeking membership of the UN. And the US is not helping as it doesn't want to offend China. The US is not keen on Taiwan even holding a referendum to elicit the views of its people about UN membership.
China, on the other hand, is steadfast in regarding Taiwan as its territory.
Therefore, any forward movement in the Beijing-Taipei relationship has to be within this parameter. This was made clear by Chinese President Hu Jintao (
He offered to hold peace talks with Taiwan but on the basis of the "one China" principle.
The sharpest reaction to Hu's offer came from President Chen Shui-bian (
Unlike Chen, whose position on Taiwan's independent status is blunt, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), agrees in principle with the "one China" principle, but would like more leeway to interpret it, with some input about its future by the people of Taiwan.
Democratic Progressive Party presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (謝長廷), is more circumspect. He is not against a peace agreement with China -- but peace cannot be on Beijing's terms. His circumspection reflects divisions in the ruling party with an eye to presidential election.
It would appear that both Ma and Frank (in their different ways) want to maintain some creative ambiguity in any future talks with Beijing.
But China is not for ambiguity. For the present, though, Beijing is keen for Chen to go.
In any case, Beijing seems to believe that time is on its side as far as Taiwan is concerned. And there are reasons for this, as they see it.
First, Taiwan's fractious politics gives Beijing space to subvert its political processes to its advantage. Beijing has worked hard on this by cultivating the KMT leadership.
Second, Taiwan's businesses and its executives are lured by China's large market. This is not only diverting capital and expertise to China but also creating a powerful constituency sympathetic to the China connection. It is reported that Taiwanese investments in China may be as high as US$280 billion.
China is encouraged by its success in isolating Taiwan. Beijing increasingly believes that with through its growing international clout, Taiwan would be even more isolated. This increases internal and external pressure on Taiwan for accommodation with China.
Fourth, with the US over-stretched in the Middle East and its internal politics in an election mode, China has come to acquire important leverage over Washington in international politics.
The US has depended on Beijing to facilitate a deal with North Korea on Pyongyang's nuclear program and is keen to enlist its help against Iran.
Under these circumstances, the US is not keen on complicating its relations with Beijing on the Taiwan question. Hence, Taipei is being pressured into not "annoying" or "provoking" China by promoting initiatives like a referendum on UN membership.
The US pressure on Taiwan would seem to reinforce China's confidence that time is on its side.
At the same time, Beijing continues to threaten Taiwan. Taiwan is in a sense beleaguered, though US commitment against a Chinese attack still holds.
No one can blame Taiwan if it is taking some measures to defend itself against China. Recent press reports show that Taiwan is developing missiles to hit important industrial and military targets in China. It has already done a test run of such a cruise missile.
These reports of Taiwan's countermeasures have certainly rattled Beijing. A Chinese official spokesman warned Taiwanese authorities not to play with fire, because "Whoever plays with fire will get burned."
If Taiwan creates a strong deterrent military force, China's sense that time is on its side might turn out to be a gross miscalculation -- especially when it must also contend with a US commitment to help Taiwan defend itself.
Sushil Seth is a writer based in Australia.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS